PDF – T2020-88 – Daniel J Lavigne vs Minister of National Revenue (International Humanity House)

Tout les documents de la Cour Fédérale et de la Cour Canadienne de l’impôt et rapport avec la cause T2020-88. Compte-rendu des deux décisions de la cour fédérale et cour fédérale d’appel en vertu de la demande de Daniel Lavigne pour l’exemption d’impôt. Le rejet pour cause signifie qu’il n’y a pas matière à procès puisque la preuve est déjà faite et ne nécessite pas de dépenser du temps et des efforts pour quelque chose qui est déjà valide.

T2020-88-DocumentsComplets.pdf

[wpfilebase tag=file path=’Documents/Jugements/T2020-88-DocumentsComplets.pdf’ /]

Mr, Danie1 J. lavishe r
International
HumanitY
2253 Bcdard Roadl
Prince Georfl€ r B. C.
vzr< 1L4
t.
Co-ordinator t
House,

REGISTRAR OF THE TAX
CEi’TTENi’ITAL TCIfERS
2OO hT}TT STREET
OTTAWA, CANADA (
KlA OMl
COURT CF CANADA

86-1901(rr)
TAX COURT OF CANADA
RE the fncome Tax Act

BETWEEN:
DANTEL J, LAVIGNE
-andTHE MTNTSTER OT’ NATIONAL REVENUE
REPLY TO NOTICE OF APPEAL
l.
AppeI Iant

In reply to the Notice of
Tax Court of Canada on December L I
Appellant
I
s 1 985 taxation ye ày
r
the
Revenue, the Respondeilt, says :
A. STATE},IENT OF FACTS
Appeal rece ived by the
1986, with respect to the
Minister of National
admitted, he does
of fact contained
assessed the
pursuant to
Act because
1. Except, as hereinaf ter expressly
not admit any of the statements
in the Notice of Appeal.
2. On September 3, 1985, the Respondent
Appellant for his 1985 taxation year
Subsection L52 (7′) of the Ineome Tax
,l^,
the Appellant had failed to file his fneome Tax
Return for that year as required by Section 150 of
the Act.
.a
fn so assessing
rel ied upon Lhe
inter al ia:
(a)
during his 1985 taxation year, the Appellant
worked as a real estate agent for Prinee
Realty (1976) Ltd., and had commission income
of $32r2I9.00i
(b) the Appellantrs taxable income for 1985 was
calculated on the following basis:
3. the Appellant, the Respondent
following assumptions of fact,
. . /2
î. 2 -‘
I
r”-Commission Income
LeSS:
Estimated Auto and Salesman Expenses
Tolal fneome
Less:
Deductions for C. P. P. and U. I .
Net Income
LesS:
Basic Personal Exemption
Taxable Income
$32,2L9.00
8,9L3.qq
$2: ,27
6.00
94r.00
$22r 335. 00
_,_{,
14
9_.
o o
$re rL95.00
(c) the amount of tax payable by the APpellant
for his 1985 taxation year was properly
determined by the R.espondent in aceordanee
w i th the prov i s ions of the I ncome Tax Ac t .
l
B. THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS UPON WHICH THE RESPONDENT
RELIES AND THE REASONS WHICH HE TNTENDS TO SUBMIT.
4. The Respondent relies, inter alia, upon Section 3l
and Subsections 5(1), 150(I) and 152(7) of the
Incorne Tax Act, and upon the
Çq4edi.ên Charter of
Lights
and
.
Freedomqr being Part I of the
Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule Br Ca4ada Act
I9B2 1982, c. 11 (U. K. )
5.
day of
TO:
AND TO:
The Respondent
properly been
in accordance
Tax Act.
submits
assessed
wi th the
that the Appellant has
for his 1985 taxation year
provi s ions of the I n come
l,
6. He further submits that the provisions of the
Income Tax Act by which the Appellant was assessed
for his 1985 taxation year do not violate any of
his rights or freedoms as guaranteed by the
WHEREFORE the Respondent submits this appeal be
dismissed.
Ç e.l, vvw,
1
DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, this
(
T\^
| 1987.
Solicitor
The Registrar
Tax Court of Canada
20A Kent S tree t,
OTTAWA, Ontario
K1A OM1
lvlr. Daniel J. Lavigne
2433 Buttonbush Crescent
It’liss issaugâ
r
Ontar io
L5L 1T4
for the Respondent
li
i.:–I
t
‘fl
TAX
TN RE
86_1901(rT)
COURT OF CANADA
the I neome-Tax
Act
BETWEEN:
THE MINTSTER
J. TAVIGNE
APPe I I ant
-andF
OF NATTONAL REVENUE
DANI Et
Respondent
REPTY TO NOTICE OF APPEAL
Department of Justice
Vancouver Regional Of f ice
2800 – 1 055 West Georg ia street
Vancouv€f r
B. C.
V6E 3P9
vr-80 523 ( BP )
Disk No. El
666-3385
TAX COURT OË CANADA
coun CANADTENNE DE L’!MPô’r
MTNUTE – PtocÈs- vERBAL
THE HONOURABI-,E AS SOC IATE CHIEF JUDGE D
”
I{ . CHRI ST I E
PLACË – ENDROIT
TOITONTO
,
ONTAIT IO
APPELLANT
_
APPELANT:

IJUDGË
_
JUGE:
f6*/7ot
DATE:
COUNSE L – PROCUR ËU RS
I’
APPËLLANT – APPELANT:
R ESPONDENT
_
INTIME:
STENO:
Mrs. Sa.rah
( Net hercut &
DËCrSrON:
Nicholson
Company Limited)

REGISTRAR OF TI-IE COUNT
REGISTRAIRE DE LA COUR

B6-1901 (rr)
DANI Et J . LAVIGNE ,
DAN I EL
B6-1901(rr)
IAVTGNE,
appel aDt,
]HE MTNISTER OF
Appellant,
V.
NATTONAL REVENUE,
Respondent.
C.
LE MTNISTRE DU REVENU NATTONAL,
intimé.
Appel entendu le 3
juin 19BB en la
ville de Toronto ( Ontario )
par
Christie J.C.A.C.f o
Proeureurs à 1′ audience
Pour I’appelant :
L’appelant Iui-même
Pour I’int,imé :
P, Lee
JUGEMENT
Par les présentes, il est
ordonné gue I
i
appet à 1’égard de
1’année d’imposition 1985 soit
rejeLé,
Signé à Ottawa, Canada I
ce
ge jour de juin
1988.
?peal
heard June 3, 1988′
i ty of Toronto , Ontar io ,
Christie A.C.J.T.C.
runs.el., al hearing,
or the appellant:
The appe I I ant h imse 1f
or the respondent:
P. Lee
at the
by
JUDGI'{ENT
ft is ordered and adj udged
:hat the appeal wi th respeet to the
l9B5 taxation year be and the same
,,
! hereby dismissed.
3 igned at Ottawa, Canada,
this Bth day of JUDê r
1 9BB.
D. H. CHRISTIE

BETWEEN:
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Daniel J. Lavigne
1’1s. S. Patricia Lee
DÀNIETJ J. IÀVTGNE,
Appellant
and -THE I{INISTER OF NATTONAL REVENUE I
Respondent
********
Held before His Honour, the Àssociat,e Chief Judge D.H.
Christie of the Tax Court of Canada, in the Tax Court
of Canada Courtroom No. 1, 9th Floor, Sun Life Centre,
West Tower, Toronto, Ontario on Friday, June 3, I9gg.
REASONS FOB JUDGMENT
(Delivered orally from the Bench at
Toronto, Ontario on June 3 | l98g.
)
86;1901(rT)
on his or^rn behal f .
for the Respondent
Mr. L. Hiscoke – Registrar
*******
Nethercut & Co. Ltd.
I
Official Reporters,
L85 Richmond Street West,
Toronto, Ontario,
MsV 1V3.
Per: Sarah Nicholson, CVR.

Toronto, ontario
June 3 ,
1988.
HIs HONOIIR: I wiII, now deliver
judgment
in the appeal of Danie1 ,f . Lavigne v. The Minister of
National Revenue.
1985 taxation
November, 19 8 6
This appeal related to the Àppellantfs
year. The Notice of AppeaL is d,ated 2I
and reads:
rtAs
required. of me to appeal the
confirmation of the above noted
assessment by the minister I submit the
following information.
Your government, your society, is
guilty of a willful involvement in the
gross irnmoral ity
/
insanity of the nuclear
arms race. The end of which shall, in
all probability, be heralded by tens of
thousands of loud and deadly explos ions
of atomic, biological
,
chemical and
hydrogen bombs.
No government or society can claim the
t
right
I
to so vile1y risk the very
extinction of mankind i to so wantonly
and contenptuously degrade and, destroy
the very
t
humanity
I
of our pr:esent l ives .
No such
t
right
I
exists.
My humanity, the fact and reason of my

existence as a human beingr prevents me
and absolutely forblds me from aiding
and ass isting those who so wiIIfuIIy ,
vilely and contemptuously’risk the very
extinction of mankind
To meet the requirements of ny
congcience, I have refused, since 1980,
to file tax returns or pay taxes to a
society that wiJ.Iing1y participates in
plans and preparations that entail the
will and capacity to murder hundreds of
mill-ions of peaceful members of mankind
within hours and risk the possible
extinction of civil i zation a f ew months
thereafter
i a society that trains tens
of thousands of young men and women to
launch, when orderedr wêapons that will
not only then end civilization, but
weapons that,, by the very f act of their
existence cause the fibre of society to
unravel at an ever accelerating pace
i
\^/€)apons of such clevaStp’-uing force
and such vast
numbers that they now cause the super
powers and other nuclear: powers to build
and test even more of these same weapons

in a f ool ish and insane quest, f or
rsecurityt
from their own kindo
I cannot and refuse to accept your
governmentfs edict that the fact of my
birth, the fact of my existence, places
me within its powers and, that f must, by
virtue of their enactments, support
their vile participation in the nuclear
I
arms race.
Yetr tâther than declare an
alternat e/paraIIel government as is my
right, guaranteed me by your
governmentts acceptance of the United
Nations resolution
#f S14 ()ff) Paragraph
2t
|AII
peoples have the right to selfdetermination; by virtue of that right
they freely determine their politieal
status and freely pursue their economic,
social and cultural development.
I
i I am
prepared to ganble that your society is
not yet so consumed by its deadly
determination to protect various
lifestyLes as to refuse to recognize
that some individuals are committed to
the utili zation of reason before

In keeping hrith my conmitment to reason
r
htith my firm belief that humanity is noT,^,I
reduced to a sirnple choice of ( a
)
reason, involving honest compromise or
(b) the extinction of civili zalion as we
know it,
I
r ask that this court recognize
the need for and the right of
indiviauils to opt out of the arms race
by recogn lzLng the validity of canada’s
I
Charter of Rights
I
and use its
provisions guaranteeing
tFreedom
of
Conscience
I
to order the Canadian
government to cease and desist from
attenpting to force me, through its
agent, Revenue Canada, to support its
involvement in the nuclear arms race and
:
the export of Canadian produced
conventional military lreapons to Third
World nations.
To this end r ask that the Tax court of
canada vacate the attached asse=’=*”nt
/
and that it order the Canadian
government to pay back to me ail taxes
ever collected by them from me in all

and whatever forms they employed.
I further ask that it order the income
tax act amended to conform with the
Charter of Rights thereby giving
conscientious -obj
ectors to hrar and,
preparations for hrar the right to
redirect that portion of their taxes now
used to perpetuate the madness of
nilitary spending towards more peaceful
pursuits such as alleviating the hunger
and suffering of the maj ority of the
citizens of Third World nations.
I further ask that it, order the income
tax act amended to conform with the
Charter of Rights thereby restraining
Revenue Canada from securing ex-parte
garnishee orders and ex-parte orders to
pay which utili ze the force of threats
against third parties ( i. e, employerS,
secretaries, paymasters
,
company
accountants, etc.
)
to force
conscientious obj ectors to war and.
preparations for war to support the
Canadian government
I
s participation in
the nuclear arms race.

r further ask that the court ahrard me
costs in the amount of $r00, 000. oo per
year of ny refusal to partially
recompense me for the efforts and costs
of conmunicating the morar imperative of
our era to citizens, governments,
mil itary and. por iticar read,ers
,
peace
activists and, peace giroups worldwide and
to partially recompense me for the loss
of incone caused me by the canadian
government as the demands of my
conscience mad,e me r irnit, ny income so
to limit the amount of money the
government could then
t
lega1J-y
I
sei ze
from me to perpetuate its involvernent
the insanity of the nuclear arms
as
I
1n
race.
r further ask that the court declare
that the present canadian governmentrs
actions depicting canada as a su zerainty
of the united states of America and, its
actions condemming canada to thè
insanity of the arms race to be illegal
if not treasonous and that it ord.er the
canadian government to cease and, desist
I
t
in those actions.
ï am determined to entrench my right
(and thereby everyone
I
s right) to refuse
to participate in the insanity of the
arms race and ask that the Canadian
government be adequately represented. at
this appeal. I shall be calling on
several arms experts, ambassadors,
;
senior rnilitary leaders and disarmament,
negrotiators of the Nato Alliance and
Warsaw Pact nat,ions and ottrers to
present their views on the possibility
and probability of a nuclear war in the
foreseeable future utilizing the greater
number of all nuclear and other hreapons
of mass murder then available. f shall
also seek to have the President Of The
United States Of America and. the General
Secretary of The Union of Sbviet
Socialist Republics justify
to the
peaceful majority of mankind their
governments moral and prudential
arguments for contining the arms race.
fn the event that the Canadian
government, âpprized of ny determination

.
in this matter, should wish to have the
matter held in abeyance while a review
of a possible peace tax fund is
undertakêDr r shall agrree to such a wish
with the proviso that a judge of the
Supreme Court of Canada agree and that
ny agreement will not prejudice my plea
at law and that my plea shall be heard
before the supreme court of canada and
that r shall be offered the assistanee
of the canada court challenge Program to
present my plea.
rt
At the hearing this mornirg, the
AppeJ-Iant reaffirned what is set out in thls Notice of
Apoeal
The Reply to the Notice of Appeal is
dated 6 February, Lg87. ft reads:
‘ISTATEMENT
OF FACTS
1, Except as hereinafter expressly
admitted, he does not admit any
statements of fact contained in the
Notice of Appeal.
On September 3t L986t the 2.
Respondent
“”:essed
the Appellant for
his 1985 taxation year pursuant to

subsection 152(7).of the rncome Tax Act
because the App”llant had failed to’ file
his rncome Tax F.eturn for that year as
required by Section ISO of the Act.
fn so assessing the Appel1ant, the

Respondent relied upon the following
assumpt,ions of f act, in-ter aI ia :
(a) during his I9BS taxation yeârr
the Appellant worked as a real
estate agent for
prince
Realty
(L976) Ltd., and had commission
income of $32,2L9,00t
(b) the Àppellant
I
s taxabre income
for 1985 was calculated on the
. following basis:
3.
Commission Income
Less: Estimated Auto and
,
,
Salesman Expenses
Total_ fngome
Less : Deductions for C.
p. p.
and IJ. f .
Net fncome
Less: Basic Personal
Exemption
Taxable Income

Respondent in accordance with the
provisions of the Ingome Tax Act.
THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS UPON WHICH THE
RESPONDENT RELIES AND THE REASONS WHICH
H.E INTENDS TO SUBMIT.
4. The Respondent relies, inter a1ia,

upon Section 3t and Subsections 5(1),
L50(L) and L52(7) of the Income Tax Act,
and upon the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms, belng Part I of the
5. The Respondent subrnits tn’ât tn.
Àppellant has properly been assessed for
his 1985 t,axation year in accordance
with the provisions of the fncome Tax
ÀcÈ.
6. He further submits that the
provisions of the fncome Tax Act by
which the Appellant was assessed for his
1985 taxation year do not violate any of
his rights or freedoms as guaranteed by
the Canadian Charter of Rights and
.
Freedons.
rl
The onus is on the Àppellant to
est,ablish on a balance of probabilities that the
(
\*
fr
\ûtlrntut & &, lt,l,
læoilo,ùaor;o
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
I
9
10
1t
L2
1,3
L4
15
16
L7
18
19
20
2L
22
23
24
25
L2
assessment of tax by the Respondent is in error. fhis
has been laid down Ln numerous
Judicial
decisions
binding on this Court, including
Judgments
of the
Supreme Court of Canada.
Ithe Court was
-Lnformed
by the Appellant
this mornlng that he is hot challenging the method by
which he was assessed or the amount, of the assessment.
There is sirnply nothing before me that can be regarded
as discharging the burden of proof resting on the
Appellant.
To the ext,ent that, this appeal can be
regarded as being founded. on opposition to the use of
tax revenue for rnilitary purposes,
for reasons of
conscience and involving reliance on the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedons, it is dlsposed. of by
what was recently said by I’Ir. Justice Àddy of the
Federal Court, Trial Divislon in
prior
v. The eueen,
gg
DTC at 6207
In the J.ight of what I have said, this
appeal cannoË succeed and it must be and is dismlssed.
CERTTFÏED CORRECT:

COUT CANADIÊNN8 DE L’IMPÔT
o For use by Individuals or corporations to serve a formal objection to an assessment, reâ
of a loss under the provisions of the lnconre Tax Act,
o A separate Notice of Objection rrrust bc tiled in respect of EACH ASSESSMENT, REASSESSMË,NT, DETERMINATION or
REDETERMINATION OF A LOSS, against which an objection is taken. If the facts and reasons set out in one Notice are identical
to the facts and reasons in another, this may be indicated and one statement ot tf$)
{F lnrlp lU\\F 1gfffit.
‘:,r,’
, ‘
oTwO
completed copies of this Notice (signed by the taxpayer, if an individual,ffibfinYrtfbri9edtf#ærl[f] corporation) are to
be sent by REGISTERED MAIL to the Deputy Minister of National Revenue for Taxation, 875 Heron RoaÇOttawa, Ontario, KIA
0L8. The envelope containing the Notices must be postmarked within 90 days after tlp{ffi*ryV4″ theNoticeof Assessment,
Reassessment, Determination or Redetermination of a Loss, against which an objection is taken.
olt is suggested that taxpayers initially attempt to resolve any disagreernent with tSl’tRREtlfrAnFEA[.Sconcerned before filing
a forrnal Notice of Objection. In the event that the disagreement is not resolved please ensr11ryffl the required Notice of Objection
is properly filed within the 90-day period mentioned above.
I
RËCEIVEn
–
ptm
N REGISTRAR t REGIsTRAIRT

Please check
V
the appropriate
box and provide details hereunder.
NOTICII OF ASSI]SSMDNT
NOTICIi OF RIIASSESSMTiNT
I
NOTICTI OF DnTnRMTNATTON Otr A LOSS
f] xorrcri olr RI,DIirt:RMINATTON orî A Loss
E
D
DATII O IT MAI LING OT (RIJ) ASSI’SSM I’NT
oR (Rri) DrirtiRMrNATroN
,SllPTnl”iBnR O’; t
1986
NOTICIi SIIRIAL No. (lf printed on Notice) TAXATION YIiAR
re 85
T)IS1′ RIC]T TAXATION OITIIICN
SUI?l?-trlY. :ll .C. V:ill 5″ti:6)
SOCTAL INSURANCI.,I No., lDl.lN’I’IFICATION No. C)R ACCOUN’I Nrr.
1.1/lç*’)’t6*21t.1
DETAILS OF NOTICE AGAINST WHICH OBJECTION IS TAKEN
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND REASONS
Provide a complete statemenl o.f’the l;’ac’ts upon whic’lt tlte ctbiec’tion is ltased and set out the Reasorts/br the objectiun:
(If space is irtsulficient, attach a separate slrcet)
:
(including srea code)
Notice of Objection is hereby given
OF A LOSS as detailed above.
OBJECTION
frorn the ASSESSMENT, REASSESS ERMINATION or RE,l) RMINATION
Na
S igna tu re
Date
,SnJlllnLil]IqR- 0{3 . 19 8(t Position or ôlfice
Canadian Human Rights Act – Federal Infornration Bank Nurnber 15605
FORM AUTHORIZI:,D AND PRESCRIBI’D BY ORDNR OF THII MINISTER OF NATIONAL RNVIJNUI]
..-…-“…
(Print)
H Tr îàxation lmprt
7
I
DANTËL LAV IGNTE
2263 8€ûARD t*D
PRItICE Gc’OtiGË
AVIS DE COTISATION
27
V2K 1L4

ASSESSMSNTI YCTJ
ICe AT f:B{J-54i1 Cfi
l-BrJd-6ei3-9,)J3 AND
t -AOù-6f)3-ù451o
I’AY
FOR
IN
I
. H.G, ROGERS
DEPUTY MINISTER, OÊPABTMENT OF NATIONAL HEVENUE, TAXATION
.
SOUS.MINISIRE.MINISTÈRE DU REVENU ITINNONIT.MNT
TAXATION CENTRE
.
CENTRE FISCAL
5 UR Ë EY
V 3T 5E 6
TAXA’IION YE/.tR – DATE
SEP 03) 1q86
LINE OII
FE TURN
UGNE DE LA
D€CL,IRATlCtltt
DESCRIPÏION DESCRIPTION
AIVIOUNT ASSESSED
MONTANT ÉTABLI
150 Tcltal hcome Revenu total ç?3t 27(t
223 – Total DerJuctions
–
Total das déductions sç41
224
–
Net lncome
=
Revatu net fi22t335
* Forward Averaging Withdrawaf Amount
+ Retrait du montant d’étalement
aceumulé
?35 – Total Personal Exernotions – Tôtal des exemptions personnelles
$4 r l4C
– Other Deductions
–
Autres déductions
260
=
Taxable Incoma
=
Fîevanu imposabla $13r tç5
420 Net Federal Tax lnrpôt fédéral net $3r l2f rOO
4?7 + Net Provincial Tax + lmp6t provincial net tl r 5J.3.4O
+ CPP Pavable + RPC à payer
+ Ul Repayrnent * Remboursement d’A.-C.
435
–
Trrtal payahle *
Tatal à paver $4r 6ô0.4O
44C Totirl Titx Der:luc tecl Totnl cle l’irnpôt retera Slr6ll.t)0
+
pr6vincill Ti,x Cr eLl i t,/ fi eif r rr rr.!altkt
Oue[;ec,r\batslllertt
-r
Crécli t cl’ i ntp6t provtncial /Abattenient
clu Qu ébec rernboursable
+ Clrild Tax Credit + Crédit d’impôt pour enfants
i CPP Overpayrnrint + Paiement en trcp zu RPC
J- LJI Overpayrnont + Paiement en trop d’A,-C.
r’ Instairnents orrd,/or Pr.ryrnent rrn filing
+ Acomptes prot,isionnels et,/ou
paiement sur prctr.luctt’on
+ Other Crr:ciits * Autres crédits
–
Total Credits
=
Total des crédits $[r 611.0,)
Balarrce (Total Payable-To tal Credits)
Solde (total à payer-Total des
créditsl
$3r 0 4rJ r4O
-‘:Penaltigs +
Pénalités .’s2 13.45DR
t Insralment lnter(lst *, lnté râts $ur acomptes pravisionnels
+ Arrears lntorest t,lntérât sur arriérés slû,0.csDR
+ Credit Intsrest + lntérêt créditeur
=
[J;rlarrce (lncludes Interest
and/or Penllties)
7
Solde (comprend les rntérëts
at,/ou les pénalités)
$3r36?.90DR
‘t Prr,:vi’,rus Rirlarlcr+ { lr tclucJes
fnt6rest r-snd / or Perralties)
tSolde anténeur (comprend les
intérêts et/ou les pénalités)
:034.€lDR
=
Enlance Due
=
fulda d0 $3,397.71
f,r
“r;
:,,,,;,1$t
Revenue Canada
Taxaiion
To: Dnnlel J. lavlgnê
225I Bedard Road
Prlncc Gaorge
Brtt,loh Colunbla
vzK trô
And to:
Revenu Canada
lmpot
T2008A
REV. 85
Minister of National Revenue
Per É2;{/’4,
Chief of Appeals
R. L. HcGutre
Apprals Dlvtal.on
VancouvËr Dlstrl”ct 0f flce
Dapartmont of Natl,onal Revenuê r
TaxatLon
NOTIFICATION OF CONFIRMATION BY THE MINISTER
The formal objèction(s) which you have made to the notice(s) of
assessment for income tax in respect of taxation year(s)
lgSS
has (have) been carefully considered in
accordance with paragraph 165(3)(a) of the Income Tax Act.
The Minister of National Revenue has considered the facts and reasons
set forth in your Notice(s) of Objection and hereby confirms that the
assessment(s) has (have) been made in accordance with the provisions of the
Income Tax Act for the following reasons:
eubroctlon 1t2(7) of, the Act provldcs thet thr llLniatcr ie
not bound by e return or infonaatlon euppll.ed try or on your
bshalf and notrd.thstandr.ng ouch roturn or lnforration the
ulnLôtor nry ârùGre the ânourt of tax payab!”e by yout
thât
ln the abrence of proper proof end rccountlng recorde and
upon Lnvctttgatlon of all tho factsr thâ HlnLstor har undcr
aubacctlon 152(7) of tho Act aoaoased thc tax
payablo by
you for tho tâxrtLon yalrr,
Dated at
Vancouver this 7th day of
llovsmbar, l 9B6
Registered
T- 7ô Lo -trK
:
IT{ THB F’ED]I}IAL OOURT OF CANADA
BET\ÂTBBN:
TRIAT DIVISTON
IN RE THE
IIî COi\iB TAX A CT
DANTEL J. LAVIGNE
AND
HBR MAJESTY THE QIIEBN
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
PLAINT IFF
DEFENDANT
Ilglnrrl
counr ôFiiiliii
coum rÉs,Éna!.r pu
cnruTbi
OCI aû rens
_G-.-^p.
wArsoN.
REcrstny oru,èrf
‘_
;; ^
r.rvrl
*
_
.-NCftONr.lArRE
O,t
ToRoNro,
orur.
P
n
ô
D
u
t
r
(
rrrnn rH rs
Àoot\l,.v oF ocroBER . 1 9BB )
NOTICB 0F APPBAL, ïN RESPECT 0F THE PIAINTIFF’S 1gB5
TAXATTOIV YBAR TS HEREBY GIVBN FROM THE DECTS ION OF THtr TAX COURT
OF CANADA DATED JUNE Bth ,
1 9BB AND MAILED ON JUIVE 23rd,, 1 9BB.
A. STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. SINCE 1980, THE P],ATNTTF4 PURSUANT TO HTS RECOGN]TTON OF.
HIS EXISTENCE AS A ME}{BER 01 MANKTND HAS CHOSEN TO L]VE TN A MANNER
RECO}TCILABI,E WITH THE HIGHESÎ ASPIRATTONS OF MANKIND AS OPPOSED TO
LÏVING ]N SÏLENT ACQUIESCENCE TO THE DAILY DtrtsASEMENT OF T,IFE AS
PRACTICED AND CAUSED BY THOSE WHO ACCEPT, CONDONE. IEGALIZE AND
PROMOTE THE
!!RIGHT||
OF DIFFERING
||GOVERNMENTST, fiNATIOI\IS
,
fiPEOpLES
,
IISOCJETITiISII
. AND
IISOVEREIGN
STATESII TO PARTIC]PATE IN AND FORCE THE]R
C]TIZENS PARTIC]PATTONS T]\T PLAIIS AND PREPARATIONS THAT II{VOLVE,TIIE W]].],
AI’ID THE CAPACÏTY TO }4IIRDBR HUNDREDS OF MIL],IONS OF DEFENCELESS FELLOW
HUMA}I BEIIIGS BY USE OF TTUCLEAR AI.ID OTHER WEAPONS OF MASS MURDER.
2. S.TNCE 1980, PURSUANT TO THE PIATNTTFF’S DECIARATION SHAT HE
TS A FREE MAN ÏII]TH AN UNASSATI,ABI,E RIGHT AND CONC1IRRENT ÀND UNAVOIDABLE DUTY TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT THOSE FEARFIJL AND COIJIARDT,Y SOCTSTTBS
WHO ALLOW THE GREED OF VIIE AND VIOI,ENT MEN TO
IILAMTULLY’I
RJSK
HUMANTTYIS VERY EXISTENCE BY THE THREATENED USE OF NUCI,EAR AND OTHER
WEAPONS OF MASS MIIRDER, THE PLATNTIFF HAS REFUSED TO EITHER FII,E lAX
REÎIIRNS OI’ PAY TA]GS TO TT]E DEFENDANT AS DEMANDED BY THE DEFEND.ANT
A}ID HAS CEASEI,ESSLY CHALLENGED TITE DEFENDANT TO DEVELOP COURAGE
SUFFTCIENT TO CJTARGE THE PI,AÏNTIFF FOR IJ|/ILI,FULLY EVADING THE PAYMENT
OF TAXES AND HAVE THE I’IATTER PUT OVER FOR TRIAI BEFORE A JUDGE AND
JIIRY.
3. STITCE 1980, PIIRSUÀNT TO TI{E PTATNTIFFIS BELTEFS AND MORE SO
SI}ICE 1984 PURSUAI.:IT TO THE PIATNTTFFIS DELTVERY OF THE FOLLOWÏNG
STATEMENT TO T]IE DIFINDA}IT:
conr,-…./Z
‘rl\h
| +
la
v\ill t/aaO a/a
1. SIRS AND MADAMES,
ATTACHED FïND A PHOTO-COPY OF A DEMAND T0
pAy
By YOUR AGEITTS,
REVENIIE CA}IADA.
T REJECT THAT DEMAND. T AM A FREE HI]MAN BEII\TG . 1 DO NOT BELONG TO
YOUR KÏND.
T AM A FREE MA}T A}ID HAVE BUT ONE ],TFE. TO LTVE. I AM FORCED TO LIVE TT
SÏDE BY SÏDE iryÏTH FOOLS IÀ’HO
HAVE NO CONCEPT OF FUfIIRE OR SENSE OF DUTY
TO HIJI.{ANÏTY.
ANNIHTLATION OF ALL LTFE FORMS BY STUPTD, PO!|ER HUltGRy rOOLS SUCH AS
YOURSEÏ,VES ÏS AGONIZÏNGLY POSSÏBLE.
T SXE NO PROSPECTS THAT YOU AND YOIIR KTND WTLL EVER ADDRESS YOIIRSE],VES
TO THE PRESE}IT GRÏM REALITY.
I ASK YOU: TO MIERE SHOULD A CONCERNED HUMAN BETNG TIIRN … WITHOUT
BET}IG TURNED UPON? TO II]TIICH COURÎ SHOI]LD HE ADDRESS HTS FEARS OF A
POLLUTED,/CO]’ITAMINATED FUTIIRB? ….THAT WTLL LTSTEN? … AND DO
SOMETH]}IG? ….TO WHTCH ESTABLISHI{ET..1T JUDGB SI{OULD HE LOOK IIPON FOR
FA]R DEALTNGS? … YOURS? .. HAH ! !
SI{OULD ] CONTT}TUE? ……WOULD IT BE OF ANY USE?
] AI4 FREE. I DO NOT BELOI’]G TO YOI’R KTND.
YOU MAY OUESTTO}’I MY STANCE. YOU SHOIILD NOT DOUBT MY DETERMT].TATION.
SÏG}.IED . .. DANTEL J. LAV]GNE
T]I-E PI,AITITIFF HAS OPENLY COU]’ISEIED OTHERS ON THE]R R]GHT AND
DUTY TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT AIiiY GO\TERI.IME}IT,/SOCIETY THÀT IS SO LOST TO
colvARDIcxr GREED AND LUST I’OR POIIER AS T0 WïLLFULLY AND l4rILLTNcLy
PARTTCIPATE ÏN A CO}]SPIRACY THAT RISKS HUMANTTYIS VERY EXISTENCE. THE
DEFENDATTT, Ar4rARE OF THE PIAïNTïFF’S CONTïNUI}rG ACTIONS IN THIS REGARD
HAS ALLOWED THE P].,AIITTIFF TO CO]’ITI]fI]E THOSE ACTTO}IS WÏTHOUT HINDRANCE
OR TI{TERRUPTIOIT IT{ ORDER TO AVOID FIIRTHER PUBIIC CHALLENGES TI{AT THE
P],A]IITTFF Btr] CHARGED BY THE DEFENDAI.TT FOR Ï|/T],LFUL EVASÏON OF PAYMENT
OF TAXES AND THAT TT{E MATTER BE DECIDED ÏN A PI]B],ÏC TRÏAL BEFORE A
JUDGÏI AND A JIIRY.
4. II’TTH lHE EXCEPTTON PURSUANT TO THE PIATNTIFFIS 1986 CHA]-,I,ENGE
TO MR. ROBERT ROY, D]RECTOR, TAXAIION, VAIVCOIryER AND MR. H.R. ROGERS,’
DEPUTY MÏNTSTER, ]’IATIONAT, REVDNi’E, BOTH HIREi,INGS OF THE DEFENDANT,
WHERETN THE PLAINTIFF WAS ÏNT’OR}4ED BY THE ÏNDIVIDUAL HTRELINGS THAT
THE
git
PI,.A,TNTIFF IÀIOULD
BE CIIARGED UJ]TH WILLFULLY EVADTNG PAYIMNT OF
TNCOME TAXES AIVD THAT THE DEFENDANT IIVOUI,D MOST CERTATNLY RTSK PIÂCING
THE MATTER BEFORE A JURY AND SIIBSEQUEI,III THEREAFTER TO THE LOUD RHETORTC
OF BOTH HÏRILÏNGS SPEAKING FOR THE DEFENDANT WHEI.I THE DEFENDANT COIIIED
FROM CHARGÏNG THE Pi,AÏNTTFF; THE DEFENDANT HAS MADE IT ADEQUAÎELY C],EAR
TO THB PIATNTIFF THÀT THE DEFE}IDANT WTLL RELY ON THE INDTVIDIJAL
EXERCTSE OF PO1,1IER BY
,ITS
LTGAL ESTABLISHMENT TO SA}TCTTON THE
IILEGAL
RIGT]T” OF ]TS AGENT TN T}IIS NIATIER, REVENUE CANADÀ, TO USE WITATEVER
METHODS II’ICLUDT],IG TfiE USE OF LETHAL FORCE TO COLI,ECT THs II.INCOME TAXESII ,
THE AMOUI\TT AS’SESED’ THAT lHE DEFENDANT DEMANDS BE PAID TO IT BY THE
conr t.
‘
../3
contt…./3
4. …PÏÀTNTIFF
A}ID THEREBY DETER OTI1ERS FRO},I BETIEVTNG AND PUBI,]CIY
STATING AS THE PIAI}IT]FF BEL]EVNS ÀND PUBLICLY STATES THAT TI{EY ALSO
HAVE AN UNASSAILABLE RTGHT AND IJNAVOIDABi,E DUTY TO RET’USE TO SUPPORÎ
THE DEFENDANT OR OTHNRS OT’ H]S KTND SIMIIAR],Y INVO],VED TN PREPARATIONS
TO WAGE MASS MURDER.
5. TI{E PLAI}iITÏFF RECOGNIZES THE POTENTIAL FOR ANARCHY IJIJITHIN
HÏS DECISIO}IS AND ACTTO}IS AI\ID HOLDS THAT POTEIITIAL RESULT A MORE
ACCEPTABIÂ R]SK TIIAI{ THAT POSED BY THE ACTIONS OF THE DEFENDAIYT ANI)
TIIS KTND IN PREPARTNG TO WAGE ALL OUT NUCLEAR I{AR OR THE GREATER
POTËI\TTIAL FOR THE UTTER DISSOLUTION OF SOCIETY WOR],DIIJTDE POSED BY THE
DEVELOPMENT OF NEIIJ TECHTIOLOGY AILOWING THE MOST AVERAGE OF ADUITS TO
BU]].,D A WEAPON THE USE OF UITTCH WOU].D KILL HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS.
6. THE PIATI\TTTFFI S REFUSAL’IO SUPPORT THE DEFENDANÎ
OR ANY OT}IER IMTO LTÏçE îHE DEFENDANT TS ÏNVOLVED IN AN AGREEMENT WITH
OTHER NATIOI{S THAT INVOLVE lHE WILL AND CAPACITY OF fHE DEFENDANT AND
HIS KIIiD TO MURDER HUNIDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DEFENCEI.ESS HUMAN BETNGS
rs NoT oNT,Y SIJPPoRTABIE IN LAl,tr, ïT IS CENTRAL T0 ALL LAWS AND IT IS OF
THE UTI”IOST NECESSTTY FOR HUMAN]TY’S CONTTNIIED SI’RVIVAL THAT ALL OTHER
HUMAN BEINGS STMTLARLY REFLTSE TO SUPPORT THE DEFENDA}IT OR HÏS KTND.
7. JITSTïCE J.A. TWÀDDIE IS COBRECT WHE]\T, ifN EXPRESSING lHE JUDGEMITNT’TOR THE MAJORITY OF THE COURT OF APPAAI OF MANTTOBA ]N THE CASE OF
RE MCKAY ET AL A}ID THE GO\ruRIIMENT OF MANTTOBA 2] C.R.R. B AT PAGE
TïVrLVg
“TTIE
CITIZEN PAYS A TAX: TIIE STATE USES I1 N01 AS THE CITIZEI,IS
MOIIEYTBUT AS PART OF A GtrNERAL PIIBLIC FUNDT. IROM THIS IT FOLT,oWS
THAT HONOURÀBI,E JUSTTCE HADDY ERRED TN JERILYNN PRIOR VERSUS HER MAJESTY
THE QIIEE}I –
COURT FII,E NO. T-1858-87 TRJAT DIVTSION. FEDERAI COURT IN
STATING THAT THERE TS NO I.IEXUS OF ANY KTND BETTEE}T THE AMOUNT OF TAMS
PAYABI,E BY fHE PLAINTIFF AND THE EXPENDITURES MADE BY ${E DEFENDANTIS
FEDERAL AITTHORTTY, IN THAT WTTHOUT RECEIVING THE FUNDS SOUGHT FROM THE
PLATNT]FF A}ID OTHERS POSSESSING SIMI],AR BELTEFS, THI FEDERAL AUTHORITY
IS FORCND TO REDUGE SPE}.{DING BY VIRTUE OF NOT HÀVING THAT AMOUNT SOUGIT
AVAIJ,ABI,E TO SPEND LEAVING THE DEFENDANT’S FEDERAI, AUTHORITY ÏIIITI{
SEVERE CHOICES i.e. COIIITII’II-IE T0 ïNFIÀME THE PASSIONS OF THOSE UPON
WHOSX TAX DOLLARS THEY RELY WI]EN SPENDING TAX DOIT,A,RS TO TRATN IMPRESSTO}IABLE YOUNG MEN AI{D UIOMEI'{ TO I\’URDER OT,HER III]MAN BEÏNGS I{IHEN ORDERED
TO DO SO TI\T TTTE },IAI”IE OF THE DEFENDANT OR SPEND TIIOSE .A,VATLABLE DOLT,ARS
FOR THX MoRAL, I{oRMAL AI’TD ORDERLY PROCESSES 0F SOCïETY.
B. THE PLAINTTFF DID NOT DEPEND OR RELY UPON EITHER THE
DEFE}trDANT’S CO}.ISTITUTION OR CHARTER OF RIGHTS .IN ËÏS.APPEAL BEFORE TTIE
TAX CPi]RT OF CAT{ADA (B6.190
1
–
IT) TW THAT HE ACKNOIÀII,EDCED BET’ORE HAND
ÎHAT WHILT THOSE DOCUI'{E}TTS ARE SATD TO PROTECT TIIE RÎGHTS OF CITIZENS,
ÎIIEY COT’ITAI}I VERY L]TTI,E IN THEIR RESPECTIVE PASES THAT TENDS TO
GUARAI{TEE THE R]GHT OF AN TND]V]DUAL TO ACT AS A HUMAN BE]NG TÏTAT CAN
NOT BE SUBSESIIEI\ITLY DENIED BY THE DEFENDANTI S RELIANCE O}T CLAUSES SUC1T
AS
”A
DEMONSTRABLY LIMTTED FRÉEDOM ÏN A FREE AND DEMOCRATIC SOCÏETYII .
contt…./4
conf t…./4
9.
(a)PURSUANT T0 THE RUl,Es 0F THE INCOME TAX COIIRT 0F CANADA,
TI{E REGTSTRAR OF THAT CO1IRT Sr{ALt, 0}t DEMAND, SUppLy THE PIA.INTTFF
II/]TH BLANK SUBPO]INAS FOR THE P1IRPOSES OF TIIE APPEAL. (b)
THE PLAINTIFF
BY REGISTERAD LETTER DATED JANUARY 18, 1987 REQUTSTED THAT lHE REGISTRAR
fORWARD
SUPOENA^S SUFFICIENT TO COMPE], THE ATTENDAI{CE AT COT]RT OF EACH
A].TD EVERY I”IEIUBER OF THE ITOUSE OF COI”{IIONS. (C)
THN REGISTRAR OF THE
COURT IN A SUBSEOUE}]TCOIVVERSATION I,VITH THE PIÂINTIFF STATED THAT HE
VfOULD TIOT SUPPLY THE PNAÏ}ITIFF WITH lHE RESUTRED SIIBPOENAS AS IN HIS
OP]lrIolr THE
pLLTr’,tTIFIl’
S qUESTrOIrIltc
OF THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF
COMMOI{S WOU],D EI”IBARASS THE GOVERIV}4ENÎ OF CANADA.
I \_/o THE I{ATTBR
Is OF SUCH OVER-RTDING PIIBLIC INTERBST THAT THE
COURT SHOULD SUMMARTI,Y REJECÎ ANY APPLTCATION BY T]IE DEFENDANT FOR ÀN
ORDER STRIKING OUT THE PLA]}.ITIFFI S STATEME}IT OF CLAIM AS HAVING NO
REASONABI,E CAUSE OÎ ACTION AS SUGT AN ORDER WOULD ACT TO HAVE THE
DEFENDANT AND ITS ].,EGAL ESTABLISHMENT AVOID DEALING WITH THE FACT OF
THETR PERSONAL A}ID COM},ION IIITEREST AND INVOLVEI”IENT IN THE PERPETUATTON
OF THE ARI’IS.RACE. THEIR SEEKTNG SUCH AN ORDER VJOULD BE TITE D]RECT
RESULTOF THEIR Ij1IANTTNG
NO FURTHER PIELICTTY IN TTTE MATTER. THIS TS
VERIF]ED BY THEIR ABSOI,UTN DISREGARD OF THE PLATNTIFFIS CHT.LLENGE
PUBLISHED PROI.,ITNEIIILY ON THT] EDITORIAL PAGE OF THE TORONTO STAR ON
JUNE 16, 1987.
‘HEREIN
REPRODUCED:
PERRIN BEATTY’S EXPOSIIRE TO AND DEALINGS I/IJïTH T1{E SMILING
MANTPULATORS OF IVATOI S VARIOUS MILTTARY-INDUSTR]AL COMPI,EXES COI’IFIRMS
THE CREDO,
ilPOWER
CoRRUPTS …ABSOLUTE POvirER CoRRI]PTS ABSOt,UTELyrr.
U/IÎH }IEITHER BEATTY AS REVENT’E MINISTER, NOR HTS SUCCESSOR,
ELMER MacKAY HAVII.IG THE COURAGE TO USE THEIR IAWS, COIIRTS AND JUDGES TO
CHAT,LEIIGE MY ABSOLUTE REFUSAL TO PÀY TAXES OR I’IIE TAX RETIIRNS TO A
SOCÏETY RACTI{G TO DISASTER, HOIII CAN BEATÎY NOW JÛSTTFY ASKING FOR $2OO
BILLIOI\ T0 FURTHER ACCELERATE THAT RACE? HOIIJ CAN MacKAY JUSTIFY
ATTEMPTS TO HAVE CONSCTENTTOUS OBJECTORS TO MASS MIIRDER PAY FOR
BEATTYTS ENRICHMEI’IT Otr, THE rÀrORl,DtS
ARMS MERCHANTS?
tryHrr,E THE MAJOR]TY,AS LOST AND COWARDLY FOOLS MAy CHOOSE TO
EI’IBRACE THE MADNESS Op GREED, THAÎ DOES TERMTNATE THE RIGHT AND DUly
OF THN MTNOR]TY TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT PO],TCIES OR SOCTETIES THAT
ENDANGER HUMANITY’ S EXISTENCE.
IF BEATTY, MacKAY, MULRONEY ET À1, ARE AS COURAGEOUS AS THEY
V”OULD HAVE ALL BELTEVE, THEY SHOUT.D RTSK PLACING MY RIFUSAI, BEFORE A
JURY AND ],ET A COMPLETE AND FAIR JUDIC]AT, PROCESS RUI,T ON TT]E
I’RTGI{T
A}TD DUTYIT OF ]IYDTVIDUALS TO REFUSE TO FUND PREPARATTONS TTIAT INVOLVE
lHE DENIAL OT’ OIIR HUMANITY, RÏSI$ OF OIIR EXTINCT]ON AS A SPECIES AND
rI{E CONTIIIIUIIVG DESTRIICTTOI’T OF OUR ENVIRONMENT.
,
OTI{ER ACTÏVISTS SHOULD BAI,A,NCE THEIR STRTVING lOR PUBT,TC
ACCEPTANCE AGAINST THE IMIIIEDIACY OF THE DANGER AND CONSTDER TT THEIR
SPECIAL DUTY TO PARTTCIPATE IN A STMI],AR REFUSAL.
S ] GNED : DANIEL J . LAVTG}IE, FOUJqDER/CO-ORDTI\TATOR,
]I\TTER}TAT]ONAL FIU}{ANITY HOUStr
conf t.. ../5
cont t.. ../5
11.
1985 TAX
12,
APPBALED
BY NOTICII OF ASSESSMETIT DATED SEPTBI\’IBER 3, 198() FCR TIIE
yEAR
THE DBFENDA]’IT ASSESSED THE PLAINTIFF THB SUM 0F {13,397.71.
BY NOTICE OF APPEAL DATED SBPTEMBER B, 1986 THE PLATNTIF’F
TIIE ASSESSMBIVT.
PNOFBSSI}IG S IYIILAR BELIEFS CAl{ SUPPORT THE IR
EXISTET.ICE
,
THtr TR BIRTI{ AS THB RESULT OF THE
JO II{II\IG OF Tt/l/O I{UI”IAI\T BE INGS GRA CE S THEI’I ITITH
DUTY TO I(TLL
NO
OTUUR HUI'{A}I BBI]’TG OR RISK THE
}I UI\,14I{ BE T}{G.
13. BY NOTICE OF COI\FIRI,IATIO}I DATBD }IOVEMBBR
7, 1986 THB
DEFBNDA}TT COI’IF IRI\TED THB ASSBSSIUIB}JT .
1 4. TI]E TAX COURT CF CANADA DISMISSBD fHE PLATI’iTIFF
‘
S APPBAL
T}I A JUDGBIqENT DATBD JU}IE B, 1 9BB.
15, THE PLA,INT IF’F IN H IS APPEAL BEFORE THE TAX COURT OF CANADA
86-1901(IT) D]D, II\’I THAÎ COIIRT,STATE THAT THE COURT THROUGH TTS
REIAT]ONSH]P WITH TI]E DEFENDANT WAS ]N A VISIBIIT, COGNÏZABLE,CRIT]CAL
AND CRUCTAL CO}IFLICT OF IT{TEREST WITH THE HI]MBLE SIJGGESTION THAT THE
cotrRT coul,D Nol HEAR TIIE MATTDR WïTHOUI GTVTNG RrSE TO Tr]E qUESTION
OF BIAS.
Its.
I Lra NO VtrR ITTE]'{ LAW EXTSTS BY WT{ I CH THE PLAI}IT]FF A}ID OTHERS
]}IS ISTBNCE THAT THB IR
CONSTRUCTIVE AND LOVTNG
AIV BTERI’TAL RIGHT AND
LIFB OF A]\IY OTHER
17. TI{B DETEI’IDAI{T PUBLICLY STATES THAT ÏT RE],ÏES ON THE BTBI,E;
THAT TT TS A PEOP],E I14IO VJ]LIFU],I,Y CHOOSE AND EMBRACE THE GUIDANCE OF
TI’IEIR CHRISTIA]’T HERTÎAGE AND TI{E UNI\TERSAL BELÏEF IN THE BROTHERHOOD
OF I”IAIY TOUND II{ ALL RELIGÏONS.
TI{E TIF’TI{ COIVII\iA}’TDMANT- OF THB DEFENDA}TTI S CHRIST.IAN GOD STATES;
il
Tllou SHALL NOT KrLLrf
B. STATUTORY PROVIS TONS A]’ID RtrA,SONS lWI TCH THE PLATNT TFF
I}TTBNDS TO SUBMTT.
19′, THE PTATNTTFF HUI’IBLY BRT}IGS TO THB COURTTS NOTÏCB THAT THE
DEFETTDATJÎ AND OTHtrRS OF TTS KI}ID HAVE FAIÏ,ED SI}ICE THE DA\J|JN OF ÎTME
1O PTACE INTO lrrEIR CONSTTTUTIONS, STATUTES 0R OTHER LEGAL MECHANICISMS
AND II{ THE CASE OF THE DEFENDANT, ÎITE DEFENDANT’S CONST]TUTION AND
cHARTER OF RïGHTSj Aliry RrcHTs, ttl|’is 0R OTHER
pRovIsÏoNs
By tfiIIct{ rHE
PLAINTIFF AND OTHTRS POSSESSTTIG STMIIAR BEIIEFS WOULD HAVE A LEGA],
R]GHT TO REFUSE TO PAY TAXIS TO OR OTHERIIÙISE SUPPORT SUCII AS THE
DEFENDA]’]T.
18.
20′, THE PIJ,’INTIFF RBLIBS, INTER ALIA, 0I,T…….
conrt…./6
conrt.o../6
20. (a
) THB COURT’ S RECOG]ITTTIO}I AI\TD ACCEPTAI\TCE OF I-IIS OB.]ECTIVBS
AND THE HOPE T]JAT THE COURT VIIÏL], RECOGNTZE THE DISERVICE THAT A],L
COIIRTS DO TO TH]TÏRSELVES AI\TD AL], OTI{îRS IIIHEN THEY CONTINI]E, ON BETIALF
OF SUCH AS THE DEFEI\TDA}IT AND HTS KIND THROUGII THEIR DEPENDE}JCE OI,I A
COIIPLEX AI’ID t’lIXTIrnE 0F I,AWS AND l'{I@lTrT0 DENY THE RIG}IT CF HUMAEI BEIIYGS
TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT PREPARATÏONS TO COMMIT MASS MIIRDER.
20. ( b )
TH]I COURT
I
S R]TCOG}IIT TON A}ID ACCEPTANCE OF H TS MOST
SOI,EMN BELINF THAT ASSOCIATE CHIET’ JUSTICE CHRTSTIE ERRED II{ THAT HE
FAïIJD TO FTRST DEAL PROPERLY I/IJITH
fl{E
QUESTTON
OF HTS COIIRT BEING IN
.
A POSSTBI,E CONFLICT OF INTEREST BEFORE GIVING HIS DECISION. THE RESULT
OF WI]]CH TS NOIV SEEN BY SO},IE AS ACCEDTNG TO THE DEFENDANT’S DEIERMTNATTON THAT NO C.A,NADtrAI{ CITIZEN EVER BE GRANTED THE LÀI]IEUL RIGI{T TO
.
REFUSE To sUPPORT THE DEFENDANT THROUGH THB WTTHoLDING oF TAlrEs EVEII
THOUGH TI{E DEFE]’IDA}Iî’S ACTIONS MAY WEI,L DEMA}ID AND REQU1RE SUCH ABSOLUTE
CESSATlON.
20. (
c ) TI-IE COURT’,S RECOG]iIITTO}J AND ACCEPTANCE OF HIS MOST
Cir, tl:L
SOLEMN BELIEF THAT ASSOCIATE CHTEF JUSTICETERRED TN COI’ITIIIUING TO HIAR
THE MATTER RAT]]]IR TI{ATI DIRECTTNG ÎHAT IT BE IIEARD BEFORE A JUDGE AND
JIJRY OR SOI'{E SUCH OTIJER ARRA}IGEMENT lllTlEN THE Q.IIESTION 0F WIIO PAYS HIS
SALARY AND THE ASSOCTATED COSTS OF THE COURT AROSE,ÀS A DECTSTOTI IN
FAVOR OF THE PLAI].ITITF V/OULD SOOI.I PUT TIIE DEFE}IDANT’S ABÏLITY TO PAY
JUSTTCE CHR]STIE AI{D T}IDEND ALL OF THE DEFENDAI{TIS ],EGA], ESTAB],ISHMENT
AT RÏSK; TI{AT ASSOCIATE CHIEF JUSTICE CHRISTIE AND llIS COIIRT l,rERX I}t A
CO}.TFL]CT OF I}ITERTST.
20. ( d ) TIIB COUNTI S RIICOGI{TTION A}ID ACCEPTANCE OF HTS MOST SOI,E}.{N
BELIEF THAT ASSOC]ATE CH]EF JUSTTCE CHR]STTE ERRED TN RELYTNG ON THE
FACT THAT TTIE PIAINTTFF HAD NOT RAISED ÀNY POÏNTS OI’ IÂW BY VIIIICH HE
COUT,D CONS]DER VACATT}TG THE ASSESSI”IEI’:IT TN PASSING JUDGTT’4ENT I 1JIIHEN
JUSTICE CHRISÎIE KI{EW IN FACT THAT THERE ARE NO PROVISÏONS OR LAWS
V/ÏTHIN THE DEFENDAIYTIS CONSIITUTÏO}I OR CHARTER OT’RÏGTITS BY WT{TCH THE
PLA]I\TT]FF COULD HAVE RAISED AI’I ARGI]MENI BASED ON T,AIiI ÏN FAVOÏIR OF HIS
APPEAL; AND THAT JUSTTCT CHRTSTIE KNEW, OR SHOULD HAVE KNOIIIN, THAT A
MATTER SUCH AS TTITS IiJOULD OBLTGATE HIM TO ],OOK BEYOND THE ABSXNCE OF
WR]TTEN LAW FAVORING THD PIAINTIFFIS APPEAL AND CONS]DER THE COMMON IAI][
AI{D THE ESSEI{CT OF LAW I4I{ICH THE PLAÏNTÏFF BEÏ,ÏEVES WOULD HOLD AS MOST
FOOLISH, UNLA\|,ry’ULL AI.ID REPREHENSIBLE THE DEFENDANTTS DEI’IAIID THAT THE
PIAIITTIFF PAY HII,{ IIONIES
l/liHE]tr’ ,AFTER THE PAYMENT Or’ SUCH MoNIE-S^.INToôA
COI’IMOIV FUND THE P].’AÏ}ITÏFF HAS NO SAY IN HOW IT ]S SPEI’IT WHEN^BOTH TI{E
DEFEIVDANT Ai\iD THE PLAINTÏFF KI\TOIII THAT THE DEFENDANT WTLL CONTII\TIIE TO
SPEI’ID A PORTION OF THOSE PUBLIC MO}IIES,”THROUGTT HIS FEDERAL AUTHORITY
ON PREPARATIONS II\TVOLVIIIG TIJE DEFEITDANTTS WILI, AND CAPACIÎY TO ORDIR
lHB DEATHS OF HU].{DRtrDS OF MIT,LIO}IS OF THE PIAINTTFFIS FELI,OW DEFENCELESS HUMA}I BETI.IGS ÀliD RISK THEREBY THE PLATNT]FFIS I,IFE BY RETA],TATOHY
DESTRUCTION FROI'{ THE DEFE}IDAI’IT’ SIIENEI4Y|I WHO, TItr A MANNER STMTLAR TO
Ti]E DEFENDANT, ALSO FORCES HÏS CÏTTZENS TO SUPPORT PREPAMTIONS TO
WAGE MASS MIIRDER.
contt…r/7
. con
I
t…./7
.
20. (e)
TUU COIIRTIS RECoGN]TTON AND AccEPTANcE oF HIs MOST soIJI}4N
BELTEF THAÎ ASSOC]ATT CHIEF JUST.ICE CHRTSTTE. ERRED TN HIS APPROACH TO
HIS DECISION BY DEPEI$DI}IG UPON THE VARIOUS PROVISTONS OF THE DEFENDA}IT’S
C]IARTER OT’ RIGHTS I,’/I]ICH DENi,’A CTTIZEN THE RIGHT TO RET’USE TO PARTICIPATE rN HIS Al$D OTHERS DE.STRûCTIOIVTAS THE PTAINT]FF DID NOT BASE HIS
APPEAI OI’I ANY PROVÏSION OF THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS. TO CI,ARÏFY THIS POTIIT,
JUSTIC]I CHR]STTE ASKED THE PI.ATNTIFF IF HE II/OULD SAY UI{DER OATH THAT HE
Ii/AS RESPOTISTBI,E FOR THE CONTE}ITS OF A I,ETTER DATED NOVEMBER 21
,
1986
TO THE REGISTRAR OF fl-IE TAX COURT. HOI,ÏEVER,THIS LETTER WHICI] DID CONTAII’T
A REFEREIICE TO THE CIIART]IR OT’ RTG{TS WAS SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF
FILI}\IG THE APPEAL AND WAS }iOT TO BE PRESENTED TO THE COURT FOR REV]EIIJ.
THE RU]-.ES FOR THE FIT,II\IG OF AN APPEAI REQUTRED TI{E G]VING OT’ A REASON.
THAT I,ETTER FUI,I’TL],ED THAT T’UNCTION T’OR THE PLATNTIFF AND NO OTHER. THE
PLA]NTTFF, TN ACCEPTI}iG RESPONSIBTLTTY FOR THAT ],ETTER DTD NOT DRAW
T}IAT I,ETTER BBFORE JUSTTCE CHRT^STTE FOR THE PIIRPOSES OT’ HIS APPEAI,.
THE P],ATTIIIFF RELIED SO],ELY ON THE TRUÎH OF THE FACTS CONTATNED ÏN
THE NOTICE OF OBJECTION DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 HERETN REPRODUCED:
III
OBJECÎ TO THE ATTACHED ÂSSESSMENT FOR THE FOLLOWING AND
OTHER REASONS OF M-ITCT{ YOU SI{ALL BE MADE AWARE.
YOUR cOVJlRt{l'{tr1’iT, YOLIR SOCIETV, IS GUILTY 0F A WILIFUL I}WOLVEMûNT IN THE
GROSS TI”1MORAL]TY,/INSA}1T1Y OF THE NUCI,OAR ARI4S RACE; THE EIYD OF WITTCH
SHALL, IN
iALL
PROBABTLITY, BE HERALDED BY TEI,IS OF TIIOUSANDS OF LOUD
AND DEADLY EXPLOSTONS OF ATOMIC, BIOLOG]CAL, CHEI’,IÏCAL AND HYDROGEN BOMBS.
NO GOVERIiII,{BNT OR SOCIETY CAN CIAIM THE
IIRJGHTII
TO SO V]LELY RISK THE
VERY EXT]NCTTO}I OF I’,IANI(TND; TO SO IVAJ.ITON],Y AIVD CONTEI’IPTUOUSLY DEGRADE
AI{D DDSTROY THE VERY
I’HUI’iIANITYII
OF OUR PRESENT LIVES. NO SUCH”RTGI{T”
EXISTS.
MY HIJl’lAlrITY, THE FACT AlrD REASON 0F MY EXISTENCE ÀS A IIUI.{ÀN BEING
PREVT]}]TS ME AÎ{D ABSOLUTIILY FORBTDS ME FROM ATDING OR ASSISTI}IG îHO,SE
I,VHO
SO IVTLLFULLY, VTI,ELY A}ID CONTEMPTI]OUSLY. RISI{ Tlili VERY EXTINCTION
OF MAI{KIND.
T ASK AND DEI’,ÎATTD THAT THTS ASSES.SMENTBEVACATED; THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT
PAY BACI( TO }4E AL], TA)TES E\æR COL],ECTED BY THEM FROM ME IN AL]-, AND
WHATEVER FORMS THEY EMPLOYED.
I AsK AI,ID I{OPE THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT DEVELOPS-;BACKBONE SUFFICïEIflI TO
SAY
IINOIII
TO TOSE WTTO \IVOUI,D HAVE CANADA BE PARTY TO A MÏIRDEROUS MADNESS.
T ASK A}ID HOPE THAT YOU RECOGNIZE YOUR DUTY TN THTS MATTER.
sïcNED DANIEL J. LAVTGIïE, MEMBER, MANKIND
…..THE CONTEIVTS OF \’JI]ICH NOTICE OF OBJECTION ASSOCIATE CHIEF JUSTICE
CHRISTIE FAITEI) T0 ADDRESS AND SPEAK æE*K TO BECAUSE, IN THE PLATNTIFITS
MOST SOLT}jI]Y BE],]EF, OF THE VERY POSSIBIE CONSEQIIENTIAI DAMAGE TO THE
DEFE}IDANT AI\,ID THROUGH THN NEXUS BETII/EE}I THE DEFEI{DANT AND THE DEFENDANTI S
LEGAL ESTAB],ISIIMENT, TIiE VERY STRONG POSSIBILITY OF lHE COIIRTS BSING
HEI,D IN COI.ITEMPT À}ID DISREPIJTE UPON THE TRUTHS CONTAINED THERETN
BECOMING PUBLICLY Kliloïriljl Ill VmU/ OF THE HISTORICAL AND TRADITIONAI
RUL]IIGS BY COLTRTS TH]I 1IJORLD OVER DENYING ]NDTVIDUAI,S FRIE CHOTCE IN
THE },{ATTER OF A PUBLÏC IqIL], TO MIIRDER.
contil…./8
contt…./B
20. (
f ) THB COURT
‘
S RECOGNTTTOT{ AIYD ACCBPTANCE OTT THE FA CT THAT
TI]E REGÏSTRAR OF THE TAX COIIRT OF CAI{ADA HAD A DUTY, OUTL]NED I1’I THE
COITSOL]DATED REGUL.A,TIONS OF CÀNADA (1978)
CHAPTER 1513, TAX REVIFV/
BOARD ACT, TAX REVTEW BOARD RUI,ES, RU]E TI,IIELVE, TO SUPPLY TI{E PLAINTIFF
W]TH SIJBPOENAS FOR TIIE PURPOSE OF THE APPEAL; A}ID THIS COURTI S FURTHER
RECOGNITION AND ACCEPTATICE THAT TIIE REGTSTRAR’S REFUSAL TO SUPPLY
TI{OSÎ SUBPOE}IAS IIITERFERND YJIT]I THE PLAT}ITIFFIS RIGHT TO HAVE EACItr AI\TD
E\ERY }4E}lBBR OF TI]E I{OUSE OF COI,,I}IOIiIS PNESENT IN THE COURT TO ASK
THEM, O}]E BY O}’IE AND TO ANSU/ER NÏTHER YES OR NO TO THE QUESTTON,
IIIVOIJ],D
YOU PARTTCIPATE TlT LAU]’TCHTNG THE IVORLD IIITO OBT,ÏVÏON GÏVEN THAT AN
ÏMPEI’IDING STATE OF V/AR-HAD CREATED TN SOME .OF YOU AN ANXIETY TO BE THE .
FTRST TO USE }IUC],NAR IVEAPONS TN THT HOPE OF LÏMÏTING THE DESTRUCTTON
1]IAT YOU FEARED WOULD SIESEQIIEIYTLY FA],L UPON YOU?; AND ÎHIS COIIRT’S
FURTHER RECOGNITION A}’ID ACCEPTA}ICE TI{AT THE REGISTRAR, BY ITIS REFUSAL,
BY H]S TAKTNG A POSTTIO}I TO PRECLUDE THE POSSIBI,E EI’IBARASSMENT OT
HTS EI’IPLOYER, THE DEFENDAIIT; THE REGïSTRAR 0F THE TAX COURT 01 CANADA
DETRACTED FRO},{ THE PIAINTIFFIS ABILTTY TO PROPERLY PRESTNT I]IS APPEAL
AI{D THAT TIIE REGISTRAR OF THE TAX OOURT OF CANADA HAS CAUSED THN PROPNR
ADI'{TI,TISTRATION 0I’ JUSTICB TO BE HXLD I}l CO}ITEMPT AND DISREPIITE.
20. (
s )
TFIE CCTIRT’ S RECOG}ÏITIO}{ A}ID ACCEPTAI\TCE 0F THB Pl,A,I}lTfFIr’rS
I'{OST SOI,E},I]’] RELTAIICN OI.I THTS COURTIS AWAREI\TSS THAT HUMAITTTYIS CONTINUED
EXISTETiCE ]S AT GREAT RTSK; THAT THE EXTSTENCE OF AND THE V/ILL TO USE
}IUC],EAR AND OTHER I/NAPO}.IS OF I'{ASS MIIRDER HAS }IOT COI’18 ABOUT BECAUSE OF
TIIE GEI1ERAL ITIIILL 0F HUI/rAI’TTTY THAT \|/lB SHOULD LIVE UNDER SUCH A THREAT
BUT RATHER BECAUSE OF T]IE FEAR, COV/ARDÏCE, GREED A}]D LUST FOR POWNR
BXERCTSITD BY TiIN DEFEI\TDA}IT AT.iD IIIS KIND THROUGHOUT THE V’/ORLD; THAT IT.
TS TI-IE’Y, TtlE DUFEITDAIIT AI{D fiIS KI}TU V/oRLDWIDE lllHo HAVE CAUSED 1O BE
PROTECTED BY
I’I:.,II]TTTI]J..I
LA\I/” lHE DESIRE OF THE VIT,ESI AND MOST VTOLENT
l”{Ei\i TO HAVE TIIOSE IVEAPONS lTïTH ïIçIICH TO CONDUCT THEïR POLICIES 0F
Al.{ASSI}lc I’iASSIVE lj’l[ÀLTH A]TD POUIER REGARDLISS OF THE COST AïriD CONSEQIIENCE
TO OTHIIRS; TlIl-T I’IU]’4AI{ BEI]’IGS SIIOIJLD HAVE THE PRoTIICTIoN 0I’LAI’J IIII{EN
ASSERTII{G THEIR ABSOLUTE AND IJ}IASSAIIABI.E RIGHÎ TO REFiISE TO SUPPORT
THOSE II/J{O CONDEM}I AT,L OF HTN4ANITY TO A VERY PROBABI,E TOTAL DESÎRUCTION
AITD A DEFTNTTE, COI{TTI{UTNG AIVD DEBI],TTATTNG DESPAIR; THAT A VERY
POSSIBI,E CAUSE OF OIIR ENVÏRONMDNTAL DRIFÎ TO DÏSASTER ÏS CAUSED BY
PNOPI,E WOR].DI’ITDE HAVTNG G]VEN UP AL], HOPE AND DEA],ING RECKLE.SSLY WITII
}IEVJ TECH NOLOGICAL DEVELOPI'{ENTS.
20. (h)
TIIE COURT’S RECOG}IITION THAT TIIE DUTY OF AT{ INDÏVTDUAL
TO RETUSE TO COI.4},{IT I'{URDER, ESPECTALLY TI{E DI]TY TO REFUSE TO COI4M]T
I’,1ASS MURDER O].I BEHAI,F OF A THIRD PARTY TS CENTRAL TO THN RULE OF I,AIII;
TTIAT PRNPAFATIO}Ts TO IVAGE NUCLEAR WA&TVEN THE DEFEIVCELESS STATE OF MOST
C]TIES I{OW TARGNTND FOR DESTRUCTIOIY BY ATOMTC AT\TD HYDROGEIU BoMBs IN TT{E
EVENT OF’
ALL OUT V/AR’ ARE I’lO L,ESS TiIAN PREPARATIONS T0 COMI’IIT MASS MIIRDER
conr t.. .. /9
, COI’I
1t…./9
20. (h)
:IIXHIBIT]NG THE WILL AND lHE CAPACTTY TO COI”II'{TT MASS MURDER;
THAT TT]E PTÂTI’ITITF HAS BOÎH AN U}ïASSAILABI,E RIGHT AND A}I UT{AVOTDABLE
DUTY IN ],A’/J TO RI]FUSE TO PARTICTPATE TN PREPARATTONS TO COI.{MIT SUCH A]i
ACT AND THE RIGI]T AND A DUTY TO REFUS TO ASSTST THE DEFEI’IDAI{T OR A}IY
OTI{ER OF HTS KI}ID IN COI'{IITTTIIVG OR PREPAFING TO COMMIT SUCH A}I ACT.
21 . JT]STTCE J.A. T\IIADDT,E IS CORRECT WHEI{ ,
II] EXPRESSING THE
JUDGEI’,18}IT FOR TI.M IqAJORITY OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MAXIÏTOBA IN THN
CASE OF R]I I”lcKAY ET AL AIVD THE GOVERIYMENÎ OF MANTTOBA Z,C.R.R. B AT
PAGE 12 HE STAT]TS
ÎITHE
CITIZENS PAYS A TAX: THE STATE USES IT NOT AS
TIIE CITTZEI:IS },TO}TEY, BUT AS PART OF A GETIERAL PIIBLIC FUNDII . WTIII,E THE.
PLAI}.IT]FF BEI,IEVES TTIAT JUSTICE HADDT ERRED TN THE MATîER OF
IINO
NEXUSTI
TN JERILYIW PRTOR WRSUS liER MAJESTY THE Q1IEEN’COU?T FII,E NO. T-1838-87 FEDERAL COURT-TRIAL DTVISION, IlIS DECISION IN THAT MATTER I1AS BEEN
SUPPORTND BY A SUPER]OR COIIRT. THE DEFENDANTIS AGENT F’OR COLLECTTOI\T ON
INCOIVIE TAXES, REVIIITIIE CANADA, CONCI’RS \J|IITH. THE RUItrNG AND ENJOYS THE
DECISTON RENDERED BY JUSTICE HADDY.
IF ïllDEID THXRE ïs NO ItrBïUS BETI1IEEN THE l”lONIE.s SECURED BY TTIE
DEFENDANT’S AGENT FOR THD COLLECTION OF INCOME TAXES AND lHE DEFENDAM’S
AGE},IT FOR TIIB DTSBIIRSEIUEI’TT OF THOSE I”IONIES FROM A CE}ITRAL FUTTD, THME
SHOUI,D B]T }IO RNLI’CTANCN TIIIÀTSONYER O}T THE PAR? OF THE DEFENDANTI S AGENT
FOR THtr COLLECTION OF INCOI4E TAXES, REVElll.,,E CANADAT TO FULFILL ITS
OBLTGATIONS AI{D CHARGE ANY AiVD ALL lrIT]O V/TLLFULLÏ EVADE PAYI4ENT OF TA]GS
ulr],llss TI]ERE Is I]'{DEED A]IOTHER ItrEXUS, A DISCER}iIïBLE CGJoINI}IG 0F
OT]JER TNTEREST,S BNTIIiEIII{ THOSE Tfi{O CO]IIICT PUBLTC MOI’IIES AI.{D THOSE II]HO
SP]I]ID IT. TIIE FACT îIIAT THE DEFÏ]ND,4,IITIS AGINT FOR THE COI,I,ECTTOI’] OF)
Iltcoi.{l] TAXES, REVEî\tUli CANADA, STANDS ÀGHAST AT SUGGESTïON OR CHALLEI{@
THAT TT CAU,SE TT.IE PLN,II’ITTFF’ S ÏYILI,FU],L EVASTOT{ OF TAXE.S TO BE HEARD
BEFORE A JURY CONF]RI’IS, AT I,EAST TO THE PLATNTITT’, THAT SUCH A }IEXUS,
A DISCERNTBI,E CO-JOINI]ÙG OF OTIIER INTERESTS DOES INDEED EXIST BETUTEEN
THOSE RESPONS]BLE FOR TIIE COI,L]ICTII\G OF INCOME TA)GS AND ALL THE VAR]OUS
OTI.II]R TAXES FOR THE CEi\T!AI, FIII.ID AIVD THOSE IVHO RELY ON THAT FU}ID. TTI]S
TS CO}.IFIR},TED BY T]{E FACT THAT THE DEFENDANT’S PRIME MINISTER AIID AI,L
OTHXR MII\ITSTERS RESPONSÏB],E FOR TI{E SPENDING OF THOSE FUNDS ON THEIR
RD^SPNCTIVE PRTORTTIES ARE DEPENDENT UPON THE MOI\TIXS WITHTN THAT CENTRAL
FUND A}ID IT IS IN THETR CO}ISTANT, MUTUAL AND I}TDIV]DUAL INTERESTS TO
E}:ISIIRE THAT }IOTHI]'{G HAPPENS TO SElrtrRELY DISRUPT THE REQUIRED FLO]ÀT OF
IIION]ES I}TTO THAT FUND. 1O AFFIRM TI{TS ONE NEED ONLY ASK: SHOULD ANYTHT}IG
SUCH AS THÉPIAÏ}.ITTTFIS OBJECTÏVI..IOR SOMATHING STMTLAR SEVEREIY TNTERUPT
THE ].’JOR},l4I, FLOV/ OF TAX }4OI$]ES FROM THEÏR VARÏED SCOIiRCXS ÏIYTO THE
CEIITRAI, FUND, V/OUI,D TI]E DEFE}TDAI{T BE ABI,E, TITROUGH TIID ],ONG TNRI”I, TO
BOLSTER HIS CE}ITRAL FUND T!iROUGI] NATIONAL A.TVD FOREIGN BORROWTNGS? THE
ANSI’,,ER TOR ANYO}TE FÂ]'{ILIAR V/ÏTH INTERI{,ATIONAT, IqONETÀRY RTSK AVOIDA}TCE
Ts A ]?Es.urrDrllc
rrll0lrr
conrt…./1o
conr t. ,../10
21 . con’t…. THE PLATIITIFF STRONGLY SUGGESTS THAT THERB CAN BE I’tO
DOUBT OF A IVEXU.S AS BETYJNEN THOSE RESPONSIBIEFORTHE COLLECTION OF
PUBLÏC MO}IIBS AND THOST RESPONSTBI,E FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF TT]OSE SAME
I’,IOI\IES AND REAFFIRMS JUSTICB J.A. TWADDLE IN SAYING THAT ONCE COLLECTED
AI{D TN A PUBLTC FUIVD A TAXPAYERIS TAX MONTES CAN IVO LONGER BE THOUGIIT
OF AS BELONGI}IG TO HÏM – THEY ARE NOl/r IN THE T{ANDS OF THOSE IJIII{O ii/TLL
SPEND THEI'{ IN II/HATEVIIR FASHïON TIIE DIIFENDANTTS PARLIAMENT I\rILL ALLOW.
SHOULD SOME OF TIIOSE I’IONïES GO TO S0l4D PROJECT OF SOCïETAL SIGITIFICAI’ICE
UT]TCH TH]I TAXPAYER V/OULD }IOT OTITMU/ISE SUPPORT
.
THAÎ SHOULD BE AND IS
Tll FACT ACCEPTABLE T0 SOCTETY; HOlilEVER, lllHEN TIIE PROPOSED SPINDIIIG 0F
PUBLIC I”IONIES INVOLVES lHE FUI{DÏNG OF PREPARATIONS TO MIIRDER M4,SSÏVO
NUI”IBERS OF HUIVIAI{ BETNGS, AND THE ONIY RECOURSE OF A CONSCTENTIOUS
TATPAYER VITIO TS ALSO A CONSCIEIVT]OUS OBJECTOR TO WAR AND PREPARATTOIVS
FOR IVAR IS THE WITHOT,DING OF TIIOSE TAX MONTES, TO WTTHOLD THEREBY H]S
SUPPORT 0F THOSE IqOST HEINOUS PREPARATïONS IEVOLVES AS AII UNAVOIDABLE
DUTY OF SUFFTCTENT MORAL STANDI}IG AS TO WARRANÎ BE]NG ACCEPTED AS AN
U}{ASSATTABLE RIGHT.
TI{E PLATI\TTIFF MOST SOI.EMTILY BXLTEVES AND STATES THAÎ A NEXUS,
SUCH AS DESCR]BED ABOVE, A DISCERIfTBLE CO-JOII{II\TG OF POL]TTCAL,
FINA}ICTAL AND IDEOLOGICAL INTERESTS EXTSTS BETIIII]E}I ALL PARTIES HERBTO
OTHER THAN TTIE PI,AÏ}ITIFF. SHOULD THE PLAÏ\TTIFF SUCCEEDÏNENCOURAGI]’IG
vAsT I{UI'{BERS 0F COI{SC]]r]\TTIOUS TAXPAyERS T0 EMULATE HrS ACTIONS, THAT
IIEXUS, THAT CO-JOlt’ïrlIG OF n.lErR MUTUAL IITÎERESTS VJOULD BB SEEIV TO
EXT]I}ID TO AND ENVNLOP ]’IOT ONLY THE DETEIIDA}JT AND HIS MANY MIN]STERS
SUCI] AS TTIE MIIiIISTIRS OF FITIAI’ICE, REIENIIE, DEFENCE, JUST]CE AND OIHERS,
IT VJOULD BE ,SEEli TO EXTEI{D TO AND EI’]VELOP THE DEFENDANTT S LEGAL
ESTABLISH}4E]]T ÏTICIUDÏ}IG THE COÏIRTS.
(1
va
22.
RELIEF I]OUGI-IT
TI{]1 PLAIIITIFT THEREFOR CLATI.,IS :
(a)
T]1AT TÏrB APPBAL SI{OULD BE ALLOI^ÆD
OR
(
b ) THAT ASSOCTATE CH IEF JUSÎICB CHRISTIE
‘
S DECISIOhT
BE RESCINDBD AND THE APPEAL BB BROUGHT BBFORB A
JUDGE A}ID JIIRY
OR
(
c ) THAT Aj'{ A}4EI\îDED APPBAL, STRUCTURBD THROUGI{ CONSTRUCTIVE
COI’1PI?OI'{ISES CO}ITAI}II}TG THBREïI’T TI-IE SIIVERAL CO}ICBRI\TS OF
AL]., PARTI]TS I.IERETO AND RBFLBCTING TI{BIR COMI”ION AI.TD
Ti IGI{EST ASP IRAT IONS F’OR H UMAIV SOC IETY BB ALLOUMD.
.’
,.-‘”,”—..”,”‘\
{:;4 /-1 I
-*
L./***(rfu”,7^Ê
Ï }T THE FBDERAL COURT OF
TR IAt DIVIS IO]i
DANIEL J. LAVIG}iIE
-âIIdTHT] IUI}.IÏSTER OF NATIO}IAL REVN}IUE
STATEMEI’TT OF C I,A, IM
NOT] CE TO THB DBFEIVDANT
You are required to file in the
Registry of the Federal Court of
Canada at the City of Ottawa or at
a local office, your defence to the
within statement of clai-m or
de claration v.rithin 30 days (
or such
other time as may be fixed by an
order for service ex juris or othe
spe cial- order ) f rom the servi-ce he..
-..
;l
in accordance with the- Rufe of Court.
If you fail to file your defence
vrithin the time above limite d
r
you
will be subject to have such
judgement
given agalnst you as the Court may
think
just upon the Plaintiffrs
ov/n sh owi n g.
ltrote (1)
Copies of the RuJes of Court,
inf ormat
j-on
concerning local of f ice s
of the Court and other necessary
information may be obtained upon
application to the Registry of this
Court at Ottavra –
te loph one 992-4278 -or at any local of f ice there of .
“,i_1,
(2)
This statement of clalm or decLaration is f il-e d by :
Mr. Daniel J. Iavigne
P. O. Box 21 59
Square One Post Office
Mississauga, Ontario
L5B 3C7
Plainti ff
r ‘-r r’.,
q ,r–t.iv
.cAi{AD$
t
I
I
t
t
I
!
l!
t
I
f,
t
r
I
‘-‘
r”!
rrù4rt,Æs’rt:’ëW61’t’*|.i|g”
r$îlf
ç” s.-Uu;
4-_ù1″‘.F
i:t *t- ç,;t’ fr”-‘ 6
q#:
-frk
if
‘Ë’\
iti.\ ti,.l 1000
I
(
*r, * i.t r f rH ,rys.T
I v
gs- Ëifl {}’s.} el
lu
if,
ry
-1,.,..,.:…’:”.:’.^”;”‘
*
SEH”/ICF C’i Â TRt”JË COPY l-f i:ttf;OF
$lçil’iif’:iCr\îltii,Ji:. COPIË CûNt’:Olili,,4iiittt;
p<)rti
..irri’:i ; i”-l
.
‘i
,:,: ,-1’1.’.”j.
i.)Op:,iiy .4i’,il’ i;û.r
i.
; ,lii)iili r.if
$ous-pl’CaUrcUi” gùiirjiiii ciu
t-ilr;1oOo
tianada
i:) i.t iIr
t-..
I Û ,À T” l:1
[‘.t l..f i’t’1., |
,,5
r’.\ T’ ,{
i’,i”3 lF}” # }.{ T $
!n,*,t$,0dÂo
TC: IIER MAJTTSTY TTIE
QUH:IIN
ïtH : ,.
DANTNT J. TAVIG},IN
PtA ÏNT ÏT’F
VF]RS U,S
Irjrr? MAJJTSTY TI{n QUnEN
ù
DE}.B}IDANT
FEDEnÆ, Aomrf Of CAf.LADfl
trf
Hl
rocr ss Hsi
l”Ë
COUR FÊDERAI.”E
DU CA.NADÂ
ToRoNro,
oNTARto
OcToBirR 27, l gBB
PNESBNT PARAGRAPH
CÏ{OOStr TO EMÏ3RACE
AIVD DUTY OF THB
T’TIAT ÏT}IDAN GIIR
NOTIF]CATTON TS HEREBY GTVJIN OF A TYPOGRAPH]CAL ERROR TN
TH]I STATEME}’]T OF CI,AIM OF TI{I] ABOVE NOTED MATTER.
ON PAGE 4, CIIAPTER 10, 4th PARAGRAPTI; TI{tr
RIiADS;
“ui!]I].]l
TH1I MAJORITYTAS LOST AND COWARDLY FOOLS MAY
THA MADIIESS OF GREnD, TIIAT DOES TERMINATI THE RTGIIT
I{]}TORTTY TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT POLTCTES OR SOCTETTNS
HI]MANITYI S EXTSTENCE.II .
THE PARAGRAPH SHOULD BE CORRECTLY READ AS FOILOWS:
“ïlffiILE
TltE MAJORITYT AS IOST AND COWARDI,Y FOOLS MAY CHOOStr TO EMBRACE
Tr{n I{ADNlilSS OF GP.EED, THAT DOES NOT TERMINATE THE RIGI{T AND DUTY 0F THE
MTI\TORTTY TO REFUS,N TO SUPPORT POI]CIES OR SOC]ETIES TI-IAT ENDANGER
TTUMA]’TTTY’ S EXISTE}’TCE.
II
.
PL,IIASE ACCEpT MY APOIOGTES FOR SUGGUSTTNG, EVÏN TN AN ACCTDENTA
rAsl”[O]T, TI”IAT MAJORITY CHOICE CAN EVER DENY OTHERS (a)
THE RIGI’IT T0 IIVE
TN RIIVINRE}TCE OF AT,I, HUMAN LTFE AND AtsTLITY OR (b)
THE COIVCIIRRENT DU’TY TO
RÏI]TUSA TO SI]PPORT PRAPARATTOI\IS THAT RTSK TT{E DESTRUCTTON OT ALL LTFtr AI\TD
WORT}IVÛITII,E VALTruS. HO\II,MVER, I AM SURI] T}IAT CONSI’RUCTIVE THOUGHTS, THN
ïtllSUl,T oF CLltAR, FRËE.AI’TD INDHPHIIDEI\TT THINKTNG lÂIOULD HAVE LEAD YOU T0
I?F]RIIAD TIIE
pARAcRApH
AltD, IÂ/TTH THE INSTGHT OF EMlrl?GENT VALuES TNCLUDE THE
WORD
IINOTII
TMMEDTATELY AFTNR T}IE SECOND WORD AFTE}I THE SECOND COMMA, TIIAT
IS, BnTllnjEN TtlE lÂIORD
qr,DOESrt
AND TllE IIIORD
rrTnRMINATErr.
A$ TI-IE MATTER IS OF SOMA TMPORTANCn, THAT IIïDïVïDUÀT.,S MUST
NSTABT,TSH TIIT]IR
IIRTGHT’I
TO REFUSE TO COMMTT MASS MURDER OR TO SUPPORT
PI?APARA.TTONS TO COI4}.{TT MASS MURDER AND IN VIT]IÂI OF YOUR PARTICIPATTON
III SIJCI{ PRÏ]PARATTONS Ï ASK THAT YOU READ THE PROPER COIYSTRIICTION OF
T}IAT PARAGRAPH I]]ITIL SUCH T]ME AS YOU UNDERSTAND 1MHAT WAS TRULY IqEAITT
IN TIIE F]RST PT,AC]I.
SAFIIR
,
SANITIR V,/ORLD. TO DUTY .
PIA INTTF’F
i
:i
i
TITTERIVATTONAL I-TUMANTTY HOUSE, ! ,.1irrii,”
I,, i ),,:.:
i
P'”;0. BOX 21 59 r :
j
‘i’: ii ,1 “:’
I
SSIJAR]I O}IE POST OFFÏCE, ‘
MlssIssAUGA, ONTARTO
I,5B 3C?
.l
Court File No.i T-2020-88
*
dffi-h
riEf,4Ellr\l-çrrr
.r-‘Ir’e.ll{ Èr
fiffi,ffiç
ffi
‘llth*X$F,iltr*
]{ebertrl
6.surt sf 6.uïrërb}r
W,rtsl
Fttriswn
I
IN RE THE INCOME TAX ACT
BETTVEEN:
DANIELJ. IAVIGNE
Pffi
– andHER MAIESTY THE QTJEEN
DEFENDANT
, f HEREBY CERTIFY that the original and two copies of the
Statement of Claim have been received and filed on the 2fth d”y of
October, 1988, in the TORONTO local office in the Registry of the Court
and the said copies have been transmitted on the 27th day of October,
1988, to the Office of the DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA.
DATED AT Ottawa, Ontario, this 31th day of October, 1988.
TO: Mr. Daniel J. I-^avigne
P.O. Box 2159
Square One Post Office
Mississauga, Ontario
I*58 3C7
CIRTIFY ttrat tl’,e abot,e doer.rment is â
lhe originaf issued out ol the Registry
P
R
ô
t
TJ
I
F
I
L
I
{)
rEË)fitAL
(OURT
0I m${f,$A
(0utf r[r,[nA[Ë DU tJiilAf]A
OtT 3r lgsti
REGISTRY ûrt €RtFf t
{
&
Sec. 48. Federal Court Act
. Scott
Registry Officer
I f{ E i{ [B’r
f rue ccp y oI
of the Federel Cr:url of Canecla ii’,e
_*.,_ â!*
d”y
rr-3(t”
.0. re sK *æ
re b&
1l-/il{‘rr*d fi:i*r:ti
Ëleqistry ûftirur
F+arreltiofln;rirr+
ÉJu
6roffo
tli;l
Sfrhrrirtr Cnrrrf nf {‘arra}u
NOTICE
The Registrar
Ta,x Corîrt of Canada
Centenniat Towers
20A Kent Srreet
Ottaw4 Ontario
KlA OM1
The Administrator
of the court
The Federal Court of Câ”àOu
DA}TIEL}. I-AVIGNE
v.
d”#”
ffi
Ottaw4 Ontario
KlA OH9
(f
nur fÉùi-rulc
%,fuW
ùrr {.anaùir
October 31, 1988
,i
;;:æ
order that sectio.n 176(r) of the Income
ytth,.
^.
I transmit
nerbîittl ïo, your
certificate
of service of
:
a
-lor,i*Ëirt
decision of the Tax court ôr Càrruâu.
Robert Bilian
Administraror
ot tirË ëo’*i
Encl.
HER MATESTY TT{E QUEEN
TO:
FROM:
RE:
In
be complied
copy of the
appeal from the
Ta:r Agt may
informatron,
a
instituting
an
ADDRESS ALL COMMUNICATIONS
TO THE ADMINISTRATOR._ADRESSER
TOU’E
Scott
cl*..,ry*>r?
\r LOrtur giiùirn[*
iVI Eli4ORAldtlUMl / n
/rors
/’1 ‘T,d
/kTo
/A c’erk
Fro m/De Peter St
–
Lou i s ,
Re
/Sujet
DANTEL
Please take
October 28, ]9BB with
aetion.
‘
ilrr ffattlhr
–
November 1, 19BB
of Process , Ottawa
LAVTGNE
Registry Officer, Toronto
VS QUEEN J.
no’te of notification received
respect to the above noted
When tfrJ
^|,’
Statement of CIaim
s ai d–
çopy
.
-T”ndment
has been
please for\Mard to
made to the
our office
{
{*.1
ï
\
(*((
{
i
I
I
3feùersl
(ûsurt
nf
($unuùu
Mr. Daniel J. Lavigne
r
P. O. Box 2159
,
Square One Post Office,
Mississaugâ, Ontario,
L5B 3C7
Dear Sir:
t$sur
fÉùÉrutre ùu
(Ssnaùu
3 3 0 Un ivers ity Avenue ,
Bth Flooy,
Toronto
, Ont ar
j_
o ,
I’i5G tR7.
November 30th, 19BB
Re: Daniel JFIer Majesty
Court No.
Lavigne vs
the
Queen
T-2020-BB
.,f
It-:—.-.
We are in
October 27, l-988.
receipt of youlî ” not i f ie at i- on ” dated
Since it is not clear f rom the d.ocument as to
whether you
-àre
merely advising this office as werr as Her
Majesty the
Queen, of a typographical error in the statement
of claim or whether you are seeking to make an amendment under
the Ru1es, r woul-d draw your attention to Federar court rures
42L and 429 (copies
attached).
Please advise the undersigned as to your intention
with respect to the document entitled “notification”.
l
should you’wish to ef{çct an amendment under Rule
42I(L) and 429, please makB
Vô”-t_
reg.r.rest in writing,
specifically asking for such arfiendmenç”Ë’ô”be made and settiig
out the pagé no., paragraph, 1ine….and-.wôrdÈ” toi ue amended and
the manner in which they are tô Ue .ani?:haaa.,
I
a
Should you requi-re further assistancè on this matter
please contact the undersignea’âî”y73-3:.10.”..,*.*i
\’
AbDFïESS Ai. [. ët.ir*ii4uNlÇ^Tl*Its
Tt Ti.iE
/rirar*!. , ,îgg,triFt*
Af,f çS::;
,’;u
{-t-7’+ é rt/*rk
n,t i+-(e -f”t
/ a €’ n4
-t ‘J’/’*
‘A
/
.-)
. /tW,
Innai
/
,./ri-,
1
/
t?rç*
{te
-?
2/:
u”
-e/
\”
,fr
“t
€ rJ o-,’4
/
fn
(
d” r’ti
I
fry
‘/
f
/
I
,
r {‘- . ./’^
c’l’ i
L /T:”,”Ç€:{rt,
tÊFËRi\’L
ççriiRÏ
*f Çôt’if”tH’
gw
ft
.*
.-*r
li 1″:t
fi 1 rù’1i’ I
;:i+* i;”Ë
Eii F- ii
ti’i’
#dh
,
gCUt F[iË’*’..à’LË
1*’ :t’t
l”’ih
T#ri,*ii
t *i”
‘frlî*;Ï’l”Fii#
/r”-f_Lhl
[-r { I
çu
/’J -P
r
/l/
7r(r trsP trKA L CcuFr or C,q,U(p/t
P^u,^e/f /rrttyrt*,
/
‘*
/J il c/
q—tt ûA
/
/-/ eÊ /r’l
“r
€s {, 7/*
/
,4ff/Drçu/T
cJ<-€ ll ,
p-
{€^r”/n../{
t-8e{*8 erl ,
—T/.ï”),r
/
/
ffip,’c- /
A
t^
t{ ) .
fJoæîrïulr.8w ir W”nlr”‘]t
7″ F*#o/ rflrafr”
1/ / JoË /**/
fl.n
ê-F *, Ée* / r /,
I
h Qr< ,’r-. 4n,
T /,*,<ryner qF #” C,
Ç
ctf)”
,’f,”nr,
‘”V*-f.
+
&F ,M” ÉJf l’hn’
o4l n.uJ t/f
lr
s {*(nJ,
‘,
/
/n;o l, fr ,F
du *^-{u, trc,e;n
,r-“/ *”
‘kn,,u
/*ry’7n * F d.
-,#u,t
/n’*,’n.
/- #- *t(;
I
i.
i
I
Fl
æ.
o
lË
a
o
N,
o
F.
HI
Ë$
et
.., I
Ç,*,1
4Zl
ËÉi
aût
–z
I
FP
i
.ûi
I
.ti I
o1
c
H
H
â”4ÉOcr:l*t*
ll
*’4, I i
ra ii
d4
i;
j,rl
rËral
: I
S liîi
e
c.rr i {)
i.iî|
-*r
i
Uî
‘tt
i
r’d
H
d’
Ë r’;l
i i
.fii ci’ â
.fi}{
Ë
rr
U j
tr ti
:ït it
(t
b,
i,
ii
rl-
–
..f lË
(l
r*
fh
({
!H
*
h,
lft
G’
lttl
H
ffil
s
rtl
r{
Ë
ril
rt
BU
lr
/
/
,{ *,. .”
Furu*/ /” f”/. /^, .u ê,.r, ar1
“n’,-
//;nf
lf
/^/
/^tcêt s;n ee- i
7
æ
^
n-J /n–*
s itrr.e
‘
e.on l;’rnnrr,
,*l*#* ^1
*J /-/ /*ra^A#
{,
u-l ary e rn ë- ,.- ry’/
“-“,
/ ét/ cuÊ<fo,n, */=
y’ay””
‘
s 4n”I or{*r7a //*/
,-;l/
For;/, U. /-/*
J’/,’,roy o/5 //” ,,4o- /*f*n tu yur|*
ftpJ
T*F,/
,
t,
lr
ti
l!
t;
i
I
I
i
I
i
(
t
O-X
-L-^À,
TST
dw
-Â
tqrE
M
ânu,* /
ï LA4;
jn
,,)-//
4
sd.n;”,y.:’-ltru
)
0
L(}
^Xso.^*-P-*tr,
f-*”r.’
ffi
yryL-*T
I
*t–l*.–
IVIÂT,TI{:TT)TD / FIA1’IC]1U]IT, : A C:I{OTO:tll / A DUTY
“l;he
afterrnath of litlorl-rt Vi/ar Three, there shal-l be two clas’ses of strrvi-:
vol:s.,fhe’t’irst in the bunlç.ers that wi-ll strelter the vror’lclrs politlcal, ini-Ïi’bary
and industrial leaclers. The second will be formed of vrounrLed and d.espai-ring sou.Is
r,vho may wel-l then wonder v’rhy they ever allowecl their taxgsr@ efforte; and childrer
to be èo misused., In tire fo-l-lowing days wl:at
-bortures
r,vi”ll the second group vrj.sh tc
exact upon the first? ]ilven now, the f:i-rst group prepareÊ fo:: thar-t eveltua-Llty.
Tlhe
-1,:ll1.I”.
t::eaty, the
trLla”l-l-mar]ç
of Defence Agrecrrnts?rr has fail-ed wlth
Iriato and the War.saw llact usi-ng the monies saved from the discontlnuance of that
miss:i–l-e 6r’oup
to further otirei
rtlli::st
S’brlke/Counter Strj-h”err preparations, Both
acknowJ-eripge the-i.r cleveloprnent of new weapons ancl delivery systenrs; hotir reaf f ,i-r.nt
t.hoir nn’l-iev of
rrTinned.late
and Devastatipg RetaliatOry Responserr .
VIIV +I
–
^11
tr])eace
‘Jlel-l-lçslr
have faiLed and will conti-nue to fail. as the worldf s
arms merchants d.eftly seek and use prrbl:Lc funds to curtai.l. meanlngfuJ- negoti”ati.ons,
assu::ing thereby the cont’inuance of their proh.fj-c p::ofits,
illhe peace novement has fail-erL. fts nev,rest and most vocal aclherents en,ioyj-n6
the ,socj”a,-l. cainaraclle ye’b fearin6 and fail.ing to participate i.n a cc;nfronta’l,ioir
designed to cieny the nuclear por{/ers the funds }:y vrhich they fue1 the arns racer
Why? .l)o tTr.ey irave other agenclâs? T’hat tytrle of invoJ-vement, thaL l-acle of r:esolve,
j.dentifies
and
-Ls
s-lrnj.lar to’bire abject ailrathy that abanclons liumanity to bLlose lvlto
most risk its ex|r:tence. True acti-vists, cornmitted actj.vi-sts, shou-l-d forfle t etnpty
hope and consicler: ac’l,ions ?.:est equated with determina”Lir:n.1 ancl tnro::k l,hereby to
forcethe
j.s,sne.
lilhere:i-s no r:ther ïrâ)r Pararles, protests aird parro’t
“t’-:rei
are :futj-le’
Socj-etal. indj-fjlerence, burnanityts pathe’bj-c and stunrbl.1:r6 st;lnce, ha.s
al-lowed the vi.l-e a.nd vio-l-en’L to rish the rlestructlon of c-i-vi.l.:lzatti-on,’Jltrei..r’cla:r}<
and pr’-Lural
^savaelene$,s,
tlie spreading ma.clness of
Sreed
a”ncithe acceleratinp; decay oJ
vthat
-l-:i.ttle
moral fi-bre remai-ns v,ri-11. cause the total use of al”l- nuc.l.ea:l and o’bh.or’
$/eapon$ of nass murder’, llh.t:ir massive prolifera’1,:Lon as$ures that use-l.ess evern.tr
Such a neËativer s€lf-impor:ed, end to human en’Jcavou.r must be av’erbecl, ÏIo
force of wi-L-Lr ilo clemand of consc:Lence, even a1 risk of anarchy, ca-n Ïre cons:i-dered
beyoird the
-l-j-in-Lts
of cj-vil- d-isobedlence or dissen’b vihen t.he fesuJ.L sough.brthaL
,tru.st
be a’1,’baj.:red, i,s no less than societyf s sa-l”vation, That :resuJ.trrv:Lthor”tt quesLi..ot
ij:ustj-:fi-es the us;e of ttre means herein clescr:Lberl.
The fj-rs’l-: l?efusi”ng to sup’port the inse.nl-ty is of u.ttitos’L ne ces,s:i-t;’. ltire
mo::a..’l-::erqu-ireinc;n’b of a shared exj.stence clemands such action. I’1o soc:Lety parti-ci-patinn i-n prelrara’l,iclnr: to lvag;e a.l-.l–out nuclear v,rar cleserves nor short-l.d.
j-t
recej.ve
ta:res or: sr:ppo.rt of a.ny kj.n.d fr.om those recopçnj-zin6 thei-r h.umetnlty,
iUhe secon.<J.: A cornpr”omise whereln thoc;e rleco$nizi.ng the necessi-ty of
‘the
first lvi-sTr 1s,6v’oid
rfhs
ri-slc of ana::çhy and firmJ.y wi”thhol-d ohl-;r
“bh.e
m:l-J.i.tary
portion r:f t.he:lr taxes. ll’h:’-s ac’bion offers g;reert possibilj-‘L:i.es of ra.j-s:i-r:r-l
humani.tyrs co;rsciousness and conscience J-eadin6 to the $ever€::’e?:uke of ;.,t-.l–L who
coLr.nse-1. a-nd pi:’of:Lt :[r:oin vlar]-:Lke ancl r,rurderous preparati.r:irs.
Tho th:Lr<1: TJ:e d.eveJ-opinen.t of new
‘bechnol”.o6y
a–l-l..or,,rirrg
‘Liro
nost &’ver:i?.fllÊ of
aciu-l-t,r
“t,o
buj-“1.d a:t lvcaT:on- the use of rr,rh.ich r,rl:Lll- murder httnclrecls of thot”t,saircls cor-r-Lci”
wel-L be used t;o force-‘tlie to’bal. use or d:Lsurantli-ng of *rl-“1. othe.r I’reapon$. The
attentive and icleoJ-o61ca”l- :lesponse of some to DyJ-an llhomasrrsrr”Do nr.lt 4o meellil.)r,,.tf
ancl the:Lr persorra.il- sen$e of r,vorth a.nd Ïrumi.rn value vrj-l.”1″.J-earl
‘bh.ern’bo
a-cco$s thab
‘bechnol-ogy
and so r”ttj-lize :i-t hy th:r:eatetri-n6 i-ts: rvor-lcl.lvicle pubJ”i,r:atj.on,
-[nr;ar::Li;y’?
Perhn-ps. Rt”rt al-so il 1:oss:LbJ-e, holever p:racloxl-cal, scol1i:ce of Ïrr.tma-n sal.’vat:Lon
erirploy:Lng the same greecl ancl cowa::dice that curses ollr’ ox-i-sLernce.
Tlte
^s;cenatrj-o
of th.e Lirird option d-s one f or :flools, f o:: all to think of
;
hut
ls i.’b not onJ.;r fools tha’b
have a.llolved ttre acceJ-era’bing d”c;ve1-olrrnenL ofl ever iiloro
lrumeroLlÊ anci dea<:l-Ly v/eapons r:f mass murder anrl
‘bhe
puT:-l.ic r,rij.l-l- to use them?
\rie ltave l.:i.tt-Le t:Lrne or cho-i-ce left. Our: sal-vation, the corrtiiruecl. e;ci.s’l,arnce
of hurua:r:i.ty, rnay l,,re-L-L::ec3-rire that we risk forci-n6the to1,al use of al”I nuc-1.ear elnc
o{,her weapons of na;:;g rnur:cle::. ],lany Llave so ciecj-d”ed ancl nre norrlr p,:Lrt:Lclpating i-trL]re
f:Lrst option d.escrj-becl realiz,ing that the encl resu-l-t :ls tÏ:e sû*rn.e êls op'[,:L<ti:r t]rree
wj-‘l,irout th.e adclerl :::i-sk of personal-ly contributing to the prol-i-fera’b:Lon of another
cl-ass of tveÉrponsr
A peucl:Ltrg a”ctj-on
j-nthe
Feder;lj- Court of Canerc’l”a –
Trial-.Di’vi.sion;il?-02)-88.,
places a cilt’by c;n f{ovel:ïrments and’bheir cou:rts and jud6qes to revj..ev,i ilncl .recl::ess
thej-r cul”pabJ-e
j.irvol.vernent j-n
the prosecution of v,lars and’the present, arills râcor
.A:l-1
Aovel:nlnen.ts, titost of th.e vrorldrs J-a.rger newsj)apers and aJ-1 inemtrer,s of
llarllanrent pl-us cliffer:Lng peace groups have received a copy of tili-s sterton:ent. Ask
hard questionso vraj-“b for construc’t,ive âh.Elversr
The ina.’bter’ls one of couraÊe aàd morali-ty, the qnest:i-on’rrrl)oe,:; r:ry T::i.rth as
a human be-Lng trul.y conclemn me to paylng taxes to ancl supporbi-ng a socieiy
.Lha.L,
supports preparatlons to wa6e nuc]-ear v,iar and the possibl”.e nrrrr:<i-er of Ln.rnclredç of
defence-l.es;s fel-lovr hrlman }:eln6s?tr
defines the
probl.em,
Serj-ous readers may’wish to revielvrtTak Refu.sal-tr, .Tllclj”tor:iaL lla.ge, The
Toronto S’Lar’, J’une 16, 1987,
+,.. È,.,,. n
. this is trÀi[it…”…*1……….. …relerrerlro in rl.r,
INTIIInNATIONAL HUI4ANTTY ITOUSII
allidavit
“/…p..â.ry..1..ç.1-….T”..L,â.
€
)
l3ox 21 59 ,
ri
QliiInlt oNn
p
. c,
,
I’IiÏS,S IIJ S/IU GA, CJTTAII ÏO
OA }.IADA :I”,5R
?)C7
clrty’ çf …,.
II
ii
do–# t I
ls
ll”**,r*f
ty’o’r,”
l,
/*,
(yr^
irJrt i/st
,- Ë ,’r,
{*r; î
‘É ,’,,
q you*CIis E,. il
”
nrr /;
“n-/,r,
Ane {-‘{* nÉ f*,’,/^*
f
\
“F^,
luru
,
{^, F,-ln
‘;
ra*f
/r
fr4
tttTuie’e’u/ .,-;”{!, ,: +l”.
{,:i
i*ilo
l/u^.( l,y
l/t
Ê-l*’sn
rF 7l* t*rf,
,+,,.,,,/
L{* of*fr.,,fa
i f.
;
f
ll( F- I’ Jo’Li^ i n*r{i, *,f-*,u, u, f’,
cuu,
(
r,
Jr,,Jf f,
,rr”rJrl
/rluu,s
ir, ft vrr/11,11-r,* o,f,r,, fu’,io,-:f
*,-1″/’+/*
i’.. ^,/-,.. lrr / . [^l+{I-: L.,Ë-..,'{“”.
,,l
1l”Ut’,’t
/l4LtLJ5
lft f* Vfl|7t11,/,* fër
tlv
/-r4”ç7q,
\l
iv” l*’t
t”
| |
‘,
*(r F-^J*–‘* {*
l
Tt’r
(,
rL, {o *o fi,\t’- ,'{‘
l’lF”t4(tl”ol
i t /t a: I tt /r rxl
“1,,
,- r’! **
(-
,r*-“/
t’ t t1n-tz r r*’/,^.,; o,lu rn t’vc”/
///*#
,o{
I fr,,,*r,r*;-s
Feri4″*# ,-,’#”
^
,”
{*
o
ft
t tvt
cë- ,’l
7h -*r$ /t/l-y fru*,trJ*.t-s
Fëtl
cfo,”X ut’i'{.i ;'” t
l–t
Ê
/,”-,”to:
ca- tt,(”
,f
t+.t-,tr:f
ftt’Y
{
^r*,
l*,- ,a”olt st’ *
(t/n**’
f
& ço,1n7n'{ ‘il*'[
riti t: i
-“ly
r,./, :rl ;
/
t:
/r+,
t*
t r,,
,{t
,’ [r* ft*
‘
*r,rn,, /4*,1/,
‘#,r'(‘
– I
s-r,.,;.n, ty
yr//;,
Ç
lrnÉ
n*,*/o,Jry,et ;'[^ ,,ir,{**.*,,o*.d,on
/u *ou’i ,'”,1’ro ,l!
/or”/
.;/,,|- ;o, {fl:.
/AvsrI*-,{
û
I
y,, *7or’n /
, r.*, , +”{ rrl ,*.; /li:r//y re; ,- /,
‘f/”
),,Ju. o, F
1,1*no/”rq/,
o’F ,n;
//;out
ov F n/, fu-i à
/*
çl^s”’ lu^
ran
âeia7 s
i,ra
irfii’n
/’,
“î)*-,
.,i/**/,’f rtf-t
tl*on
/, /7′
l\g1 W.t tnf, n’\ ,^ç-{,T 5^
-f’/;?ot7l
t’I-“, q’U.&rË
ftr,
7,tr
“t
Ro’fcr,r/
cr,,{
6 f C^**o/n’
-”
t:r”‘næ’n
ét*+ f,
c*’ /’ S”l5 3
t”
“
(ln,rt 7o,’
’74<-
flip, f+//otzut;y €-rueryefln
ori’ CrWtW/f
T-2020-BB
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
IN RE the Income Tax Act
BETI^IE
DANIEL J. LAVIGNE,
Plalntlf f
,
– and
{
HER I.,IAJE STY THE
QUEEN ,
Defendant
NOTI CE OF I.IOTION
TAKE NOTICE that an applicatlon wi11 be made ro rhis
Honourabl-e Court on behalf of the Defendant at 330 Universlty
Avenue, Bth Floor, ToronÈo, Ontario on Monday, the 12th day of
Decemberr lgSB aÈ 10 orclock 1n the forenoon or so soon
thereafter as the appllcatlon can be heard, for an Order:
( a) strlking out the Statement of Clal”m hereLn
‘
and disrnlsslng the aetion on the basls that,
pursuanr Èo Rule 419(l)(a) of the Federal
Court Rules, the Statement of Clalrn discloses
no reasonable cause of action;
(b)
in the alternatlve, that pursuant to Rule 415
of the Federal Court Rules, the
plaintiff
provlde particulars as to the basls for the
appeal from his asses6ment of Ëax;
(c)
in the further alterrrative, for an Order
granting the Defendant, ân extenslon of tlme
withln which to f11e a Defence.’
E N:
P’li,Îô’fo’P
t.”ld
.\
AND
be read the S
TAKB NOTI CE
tatement of
-2-thaË in support
of
Clalm, together
wlth
may advLse and this
the applicarlon
will
such further
and
I{onourable
Court
other materlal as counsel
perrniL. \
19BB
TO:
AND TO :
John
Depu
Solt
P ll
rr-ï t
DATED ar roRoNTo,
onrarlo, rhl tofu u^, .,
i,.],r.rwr^11u’,.;
C. Tait
ty Attorney General of’canada
cltor for the Defendant
The Adrnlnistrator
Federal
Court of Canada
Trial Division
300 Universlty
Avenue
Bth FIoor
TORONTO,
Ontario
I-,15G lR7
I’1r. DanieI J. Lavigne
P.O. Box ZL59
Square 0ne
post
Office
MISSISSAUGA,
0ntarlo
L5B 3C7
*-rr:g*@
I
t
I
I
I
I
T-2020-BB
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
IN RE the ‘Income
Tax Act
BBTWEE N:
DANIEL J. I,AVIGNE,
– and
r
HER MAJE STY THE
QUEEN ,
PlalnËif f
,
Def endant.
,i
”
l ‘-l)ltT:’tl. lÇA t t:
r r.rl'{uiri I’Û
DATEr DtC $ ItltJt
NOTICE OF UOTION
d ,’,
.’
\;.q;1″.
{.’,
l*-J/
J, PauI MaleËte
Department of Justice
Toronto Reglonal Off lce
Sulte 500
I Front Street l{est
TORONTO, Ontarlo
I”15 J I A5
Tele: 973-3105
File: TO. 160431-1
ftlitl()tl tllil) t:,Fl’t’li
y
[\u.
Ilqr Dli l,’tlistltilt”i’lûN
tr#@
Department of Justice
Canada
1 Front Street West,
Suite 500.
Toronto, Ontario,
MsJ 1A5
Ministère de ia Justice
Canada
‘1
, rue Front ouest,
Pièce 500,
Jglonto
(Ontario)
MSJ
.1A5
ULTTVERED BY EAND
The Adrninis trator
Federal Court of Canada
Trial Division
330 University Avenue
Bth Floor
TORONTO,
0ntario
M5G 1R7
Dear Sirs:
Re: Daniel J.
CourË No:
Decennber 6, 1988
Tel.
973-3689
æât æfrf;QI
an Affidavit in
/ùÉi’s&’l’H
Êt
$Ët r lsss
lfi
@ FEATE
DIt c^nAuilq,
:
ruoNTO.
OSTnBKI,
i
Our File:
Enclosed herehrith
is
d.tplicare
for fi-ling with rhe
TAVIGNE v. H.II{ . Q.
T-2020-88
TO. r60431-l
a copy of
Court.
Yours very truly,
I
t1
l^..
J o
Marie-Thêrè
Counsel
,
Ta
Toronto Reg
se Boris
x Litigation
i-onal
0ffice
MTB/ tn
Enclosure
CanadTi
pïrbrral 6.surt sf {tana}a
6.sur fÉù êraiæ bu $.antrba
DA’E:
“iâryRANDUM
/ NorE DE sERVlcE
{iAt?;’
Ee â*w.’
TRobert
Gravelle, Processing Support Clerk
RE:
Comments ,/ Remarqt
-T”a)èra-o
-f E
I transuit herewith the following marerial:
(
i
\
receipt of the material on
memo and return th terial
Processing Support
Clerk
c.c.: D. Wood
Chief of
Receipt of the
acknowledged.
Records
above-noted material is hereby
,/1) Q /^n
\
| J
rl(jv.-ÇÂ ‘1^^
,
‘Ô(
.
Dat.e
W#ru,tJa
SÇ*l?al /r)
f’REÀs
oH
t
M;fu ta-p-Fa
Please acknowledge
the attached copy of this
as soon as possible.
Office
Postal
Date
tJrn,*{4
code .,(.{.6. .’.(,:
à”*=**^**’5f*
.+ftt
REGULAR MAIL
REGISTERED
DOUBLE REGISTERED
BY HAND
n
u
,EJ
COURTNO. ….
STYLE OF CAUSE
As indicated below, the
proceeding is forwarded
t Certified copy
tl Certif icate
tl Certified copy
D Certificate
I Returned herewith:
(1)
of the judgment of
relating to the above-mentioned attached material
herewith:
of th{ ordef of .
tl Reasons for judgment relating
Reasons for
n judgment
of
I order
to the above were not given by the Court.
t a i r i I t a a r r a a r . a a
,a
r
.
! a . a r . a a r . a a t a r
dated
and copy of
reasons of
dated
u
n
f judgment
Certified copy of
U order
Status of Proceedings .
n Acknowledge receipt by sending back green copy
N. B.
*
Pursuant to section 5 of the Official Language
decisions, orders and judgments,
including any reasons
given therefor, issued by the Court are issued in both official
languages. ln the event that such documents are issued in
the first instance in only one of the official languages, a copy
cf the versicn in the othe:’ official language wi!! be fci”warded
on request when it is available.
Conformément à I’afticle 5 de la Loi sur les langues officielles, les décisions, ordonnances et jugements finals, avec
les motifs y afférents, sont émis dans les deux langues officielles. Au cas où ces documents ne seraient émis, êr1 premier lieu, que dans l’une des deux langues officielles, une
copie de la vei’sion dans l’autre langue officielle sei’a ti’ansmise, sur demande, dès qu’elle sera disponible.
COURT FILE COPY
ï
.#?”-/- Off ice
Postaf
Date Jb,*-*”.fr’*. . ./4ft
REGULAR MAIL t]
REGISTERED T
DOUBLE REGISTERED T
BY HAND D
COURTNO. ..t.
STYLE OF CAUSE
As indicated below, the attached material rela
proceeding is forwarded herewith:
t Certified copy ) of thflordef of . . . fr
/K-f
.
I Certificate )
*
tl Certified copy
tl Certif icate
of the judgment of
. . dated I a
.a,
t
a a a a I a a t t a a
‘a
a a r a I
tr Reasons for judgment
relating to the above were not given by the Court,
tl Reasons for
D judgment of . . .
I ordgr .. ………………. datgd a a a
_
a a a a
.a
a a a a a a
{.
tr
T
n
Certified copy of
U
Returned herewith:
(1)
iudgment and copy of
order reasons of
dated
Status of Proceedings . …:.. ….”.’..”:lÏ
! Acknowledge receipt by sending back green copy
N. B.
*
Pursuant to section 5 of the Official Languages Act all final
decisions, orders and
judgments,
including any reasons
given therefor, issued by the Court are issued in both official
languages. In the event that such documents are issued in
the first instance in only one of the official languages, a copy
of the version in the other officiai language will be foi-w’arded
on request when it is available.
‘
– Ë:
–i;;i’–Fl’
”
:”‘ï’-r;I I[ i:
*
Conformément à l’article 5 de la Loi sur les langues officielles, les décisions, ordonnances et jugements finals, avec
les motifs y afférents, sont émis dans les deux langues offi-. cielles. Au cas où ces documents ne seraient émis, êî premier lieu, que dans l’une des deux langues officielles, une
copie de la version
.dans
I’autre langue officielle sera transmise, sur demande, dès qu’elle sera disponible.
tj*lr+
r) rr+
-zil.^rr –
i,-6sur fÉùÉrule ùu 6,anala
NOTE DE SERVICE
\
I
!
\.
I
l
I
t
‘I
.
Comrnents ,/ Rema
TO:
FROM:
the
as
material on
rh terial
Processing
S upporr
Clerk
c.c.: D. ktood
Chi ef of
ReceipÈ of the
acknowledged.
Records
above-noted
material is
I
hereby
StgnaÈure
Date
\
i
I
I
I
i
i
,
MEMORANDUIVI /
DATE: 7/BÛ
RE:
RoberÈ Gravelle, Processing Support Clerk
-T’*â-c&o
-Et53
I transmlt herewith the followJng marerial:
fu&:f
m,4,, o
S6*l?o/{ /r)
tt
RE as olù
tt
ffi;fu r4p-Fô
Please acknorrledge
receipÈ of the
attached copy of Èhis rDemo and return
soon as possible.
TAX T8ËJHT 8F CANAtr&
ADDRESS ALL CCI\4MUN|CAîIONS
ÏO TFIE REGISTRAR
y_of the Court,
Court of Cana â^,
ONTAR J O
Court file no. r-2020-BB
CS[}R CA}$AI}IEN$IE DE L’ffiPûT
ADRESSËZ TOUTE CORRESPONDANCE
AU REGISTRAIRE
November 7, lgBB
CTiAWA, CANADA
K1 A 0h41
Registr
Fede ra 1
OTTAWA,
KlA OHg
Dear Sir:
RE: DANTEL J. LAVTGNE
V. HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
File no. B6-1901(rr)
I have been notified
that
the Tax Court of Canadars decision in the
“uové-rne;;i”;;u-gp;à”i’il”,
been appeared
to the Federal court of canada. if,;;;io;u, I an tiânsnitting
to you in dupricate,_purluant
to sectiÀn 176 (r)
of the rneome
!aæ Aàt, the’r’oiià”ine
aÀ.ùràriiï
1. Notice of Appeal
2. Reply to Notice
to the Tax Court of Canada.
of Appeal.
3′- certified
copy fron the Minute Book of the Tax court of Canada
4
‘
Docurnentr
tiled
with the court, by the lrtinisrer
under
Section 170 (Z)
.
Certified
Exhibits
copy of the Judgment. and the reasons
therefor.
s truly,
5.
6.
Receipt of
this
the above is
d”y of
hereby acknowl edged
,
19 o
l
I
NoveIilber 21
r
1956
Re É{istrar Of Th e Ta x
Centennial Towers
200 Kent ,Strr)e’b
Ct tawa, Canarla
KlÂ 0M1
”
i::
Re : The at tache cl as Éie ssrne nt
Dear Sir,
s confirmation thereofn
As requireci of rne to appeal the confirmation of the above noted
aËsessment by the mlni-ster f submit the foll-owing information.
Your government, youq society, is gullty of a will-ful- involvement in
the
r{ross lmmoral-j-ty/insanity of the nuclear arms race. f’he end of
which shalL, in all probability, be heralded by tens of thousands
of Loud and deadly explosionel of atomic, biologlcal, chemical and
hydrogen bombs.
No fTovernment
or society can claim the
rr
rlÂht
rt
to so vilely risk ,
the very extincti.on of mankind; to $o wantonly and contemptuously
degrade and destroy the very
lrhumanity tr
of our present }lves. hlo
such
tr
rigirt
ti
exists.
My humanity, the fact and reason of my existence as a human beùng,
prevents me and. absolutely forbids me from aidi-ng and. assisting
those who so wi.flfully, vil.ely and conternptuously risk the very
exti-nction of manki-nd.
‘To
meet the requirements of my conscience, f have refused, slnce 198O,
to file tax re’burns or pay taxes to a society that willingly participates in plans and preparatlone that entail- the wj.ll- and capacity
to murder hundreds of mlllions of peaceful members of mankind withj-n
hours ancl risk tire possible extinction of civj”lj-zation a few months
thereafterl a soclety that trains tens of thousands of young men and
women to.l-aunch, when orrlered, weapons that wi-ll. not onJ-y then end
civj.l.iz:atlon, but weapons that, by the very fact of their existence.’
cauae the fibre of society to unravel- at an ever accelerating pace;
weapons of such devastating force and such vast numbers that they now
cause the super powers and other nuclear powers to buil-d and test
even more of these same weapons ln a foolish and insane quest for
rr
secur:Lty
rt
from their own-klnrl.
I cannot and refuse to accept your governmentrs edict’bhat the fact of
my bj.rth, the fact of my existence, places me within j-‘bs powers ancl thal
I must, by virtue of their enactments, support their vil”e participation
1n the nucl.ear arms race.
Yet, rather than declare an alternate/parallel government as is my
ri6ht,
zuaranteed me by your governmentrs acceptance of the United
l{atj-ons resolution t#1514(XV) Paragraph 2,
fr
A1l. peop}es have t}re right
.to se.l-f-cletermination; by virtue of that right they freely determine
tireir politIcal status and freely pursue their economic, social ancl
cul.tural- devel-opmenl,.rf ;
I am prepared to ganble that your socJ-ety is
not yet $o consumed l:y
j-ts
deadly detormlnation to protect various
lifestyles as to refuse to recognize that some individuals are
committed to the ùtilization of reason before passion.
In keepi.ng lvith rny commitment to reason, with my firm belief that
humanlty is norv ràduced to a s:-mple cr,oicà-àf a;)-“ô*uotr, involvingi
honest compromise or (b) the extinction of civllization as we know it,
I aslc that tlris court recognize the need for and the’right of’indivldua-*’r
^^* ^rr* ^f the arm6 race by recognizing the valldity of Canadare vv vI/ u v(a v v
rr
Charte”r Of l?ig;hts
ft
and use lts provisj-ons guaranteelng
rr
Freedom
Of Conscj-ence
tt
to order the Çanadian fiovernrnent
to cease and desist
fron attempting to force frer through its agent, Revenue Canada, to
support its lnvolvement in the nuclear arms race and the export of
Canadian procluced conventional mili-tary weapons to Thj-rd World nations.
To this enci ï aslc tirat the Tax Court Of Canada vacate the attacherl
assessment and that it order the Canadian government to pay back to
ne all taxes ever collected by them from me in all ,and lvha.tever
forms they empJ..oyed.
.,
fr
i ,’-‘\
I
l'”1 r t f i
llr
C ott
‘j”
RËCEtvED .r nEçU
REGI$TRAR r REGTSTRATRÉ
Ip.it CTJUkI ()t
CAHA0A
ËOljit tAIt \t)tËNttË Df [‘tfttPôï
ÛTIAWA, CÂr.{AÛA
r.. I r | /Z
I
..1…/2
T further ask that it order the income tax act amend.ed to conf
jrl
with the Cirarter Of Rlghts thereby
Siving conscientious objectu*’s to
war and preparations for war the right to redlrect that portion of
their taxes noï/ used to perpetuate the madness of mllitary spending
towaîds more peaceful pursult,s such as aïleviating the hungçer and
suffering of the rnaiority of the citizens of Third lll/orldi nations.
I
I furtirer ask that it order the income tax act amend.ed to conforrn
with the Charter 0f Rights thereby restraining Revenue Canada from
securlng ex-parte garnishee orders and ex-parte orders to pay v’rhicti
uti.l-ize the force of threats agaj-nst third parties (
j..e.
empJ.oyers,
secretarj-esr paymastersr cornpany accountants, etc. ) tr: force
conscien’bious objectors to war anci preparations for war to support
the Canacij.an governmeltrs participation in the nuclear arms râcêr
ï further aslc that tire court award. me costs in the amount of ïI1OO.rJOO.O
per yealî of my refusaÏ to partially recompense me for the efforts and
costs of communicating the moral imperative of our era to citi-aens,
Êovernmentse military and political Leaders, peace ac’bivists and
peace groups worl.dwide andi to partialJ-y reconpense me for the l-oss
of income caused me by the Canadian government as the dema,ncls of my
conscience made me limit my income so aË to limit the amount of
money the government coul.d then
tt
l-ega}ly
rr
eeize from me to
perpôtuate-its lnvolvement in the inàanily of the nucLear arms râcsr
,
I further ask {,ha’|, the court cieclare that the present Canaci:Lan
:
gôvernmentrs actions depicting Canada a$ a suzèrai-nty of tire tlnitecl
States of America and its actlons condemming Oanada to the insr:ni-ty
of the arms r:ace to be illegal if not treasonous and that it order ttre
Canadian 6overnment to cease and. desist
j-n
those actrons.
I am determlned to entrench my right
( and thereby everyonets ri6ht )
to refuse to participate in the lnsanlty of the arms race and etstrc
that the Canadian governnient be adequately represented at l,hj-s appeal.
I shall be calling on several arns experts, ambassadors, senlor
military leader^s and disarmament, negotiators of the Nato Alliance and
Warsaw Pact natj-ons and
‘others
to present their views on the
possibility and probability of a nuclear war in tlre foreseeable
future utilizj-n$ the greater number of all nuclear and other weapons
of mass murder then avail-abl-e. f shal-l a]so seek to have’bhtl Preàident
Of The Uniterl States Of America and the General Secre’h,ary of Tltre
Union Of Soviet Socla-List Repnbli-cs justlfy to the peaceful majority
of nankind their governments morai- and prudential arguments for
continuing the arms race
Tn the event that the Canadian government, apprizecl of my deterrn-i.nat-Lon
in this matter, should wish to have the matter hel.tl i.n abeyance liirj.le
a review r:f a possible peace tax fund:i-s undertahen, I sha]1. aflree to
such a w:lsh wltir the
pr’oviso that a iudge of the Supreme Court of
Canada agrîee and that my agreement will not
Frejudice
my plea a,t law
and that my plea sha]l be heard before the Supreme Court of Can;rda and
that f shall be offered the assisb;rrtce of the Canada Oourt 0ha.1l”enge
Prog::arm,rto present my pl-ea,
I apologize to Lhe Tax Cou.rt 0f Canada
j.f ‘m.y
plea shoulcl burden the
court in el manner beyond its normal functiorr” Tha.nk you,
My address for servj-ce is noted below,
Tl:ei d
j”
ç-[r”i
c t o f’f
j-
r: e :i-Ë Van c r:u ver .
(;
r*4
Mr . Danie l. J nl l”,er.vi”
64ne ,
Co*”ordinat or
n
II ouse I
Internati ona:L I{umanit.y
2253 P,e dard l?o€rd,
Prince Ge orge ,
f3
”
C .
v?’!d 1 l*,/+
cr The Right Honourable Mssrs. B. l”lulroney; J. Clarkl .I. ll’urner.
The distinguished Mssrs. M. Gorbachevl R. Reagan,
The Honourabl-e Mss;rs. B. Iiroadbent; E. Mckay.
The Righ.t I-ionourabl-e
Mr. pi.erre
E. Trurieau
Renowned peace activist Dr” blelen Caldj-cott
Sel-ected members
lof
the liouse .of
Commonsn
Frlii litrlug
tti ‘i “
lljhri A :i{.r'[.
‘.-..1”!-
?Â”‘} i-}f i:,:!Iïiijfiifr. fi
Æ’lf-T 1.*Ë {: 3T! S,tàT! :;fri
1L4
DAf-j1Ë.L L,”rV iGl”-J t
2?5:l i I.
-,,â.
Ë. D i D
-‘FlIf{C€
Grtli:: Gr:
;:’7
vit(
DÂ’ii
srP t*.? ,
,tijf,ùtjl’jl- NC. – 4i’ I)Ë t:a)ilii:1’F
l’i.+),r
i, ii-;i’i
42′:t 53f Zt+L I
SU’IËrY’
V:T 5E T
Tue{ lrri;crrre fl*venu !2tê,
?e:i
f
– Trr’ra! Dr:ductions
—T
2?-4- Ë=&iutlftcr:::?e
*,,**:’ ::,’ :’
-0 ”
o u
:’:: *
*-
frgvenu ii€1-#{ff_ taÈr
‘r — r
-rs.-.’ù!
,.. û ff
+ hetrait du nts;liêTit C’ételcment
itcûirînulé
:i;
-”:
dê 1
-…4ft4=–ïr r- r: ç .:J:
* Forwurd Averaging r$’;ithdrawal ltrnount
;z 35 –
Totai Fersonal Êxenrpiicns
* Tr:tal ties exemprrûts [têt’s{iitTite/ie.ç
t$q * 14,S
– Other Deducticns –
Autres déCu*tions
?bÛ
=
TeÉahle lncome
* Revenw irnposahle $l3r:ç5
J+?c fde”t Feciaral Tax impôt fédéral net :S-1r 1?7c{}$
427 + fvet Provinciai Tax + fmp6{ prcvincia! nei S I r 5 f -3 .4;3
+ CPP Payable + ,ffPC à payer
+ Ul lkepayrnent + flembau rsement ci’A.- C.
4″15
–
Total payable =
Tntal ù payer $4r 66û*4û
+ d+S Tatal Tax Deducteri 7r.xal rle i’impttt retenu S, 1r € 11r13ii
–
Frcvirtcial Tax Crudii,,’Fiefurriii:l
O. uebec Ai:ra tarnter rt
It +’ Crédit cl’ int;sôr prnvinrii.tt /f:t;t;treffisfii
cf t: Cu éLe c r e rn b,-tu r sa bl e
+ ChilrJ Tax Crecjit + tréCit ci’intp,5t pilu{ enfants
+ CPF Overç:ayment 1- Faietmsfit en îrop au {ïPC
{‘ Ul f)vcrpayment + Faiemer’)i ei, trt{t d’A.-C.
A compte s Strov
i s ion n al s et / ou
paiemerlr sirr productlon
+ lnstalmÉ)nts ancl/or Parynrent on filiriçr
+ Other Cradits ‘t- .4ufres créclirs
= îotat Creciits
*
Ttltatrles crÉrlrts Tlç61t.rJ3
Balance
{Totai Payable-Total Creditsi
Solde
{wa/
à paysy-Total des
crérf its)
S3r [i 4rt
“4û
‘*Penaltiels .r Fdna/itds $e I 3
‘
r+rî
) Fi
{- insti}iment Interr}s -r /rrdrÊls .sur scontptss provisiannels
+-Arr6ars
interest *, fn:té rët su r ar rié ré s SlS,û.tSDn
+ Credit int€rest + /nrérét créditeur
=’
Faiafice
{lnclucies lntelrest
and,/or Penalties)
3
So/de {camprenci lesintér$trs
et,/otr les ,lcina lites)
$3ç-:.:#?”ÇûDA
:t Previous Balance
{iltcluries
lnterest an<ir’or Pe:reities)
*,’i’oic{e
a nté rie it î i’corl7 A}
re ncJ I es
intérêts ei/ou lr:-ç périalitesi
Ji 3{ . Ê1.
q
:
Balance Due
:
Sofde rit; û3″3ç’7.71
ft,AY
:f- t-l
q
I i.!
IF Yû1, hAVE A,.lY ùU:i:rI=5 Fi-GA.rlOIl’\G YCUR ,A55ASSM:NT’ Y:i.,
C’,-:lhlTACT
“TF:
VÂirCfUV;F DISfËICT ÇF’FlC’i’ Ai {‘8ç-5+11 CF
LCTNG I-JI S’T’ANi:- CALI.5 IN ËI;?TîISH CÛLL’M:]IA I-:TË,.i-{,É.3_’.}:3 AhD
YLJK’:lN
qND
t’itl:Tl{Ë: {:T:Ë\l f1 4iTISH {i.lLUJvAIA t-âti }-ô63-i}451.
H.G. ROGËBS
DEPUTY MINISTEff. DEPANTIVIENT OF NATI0NAL BEVENUÊ. TAXÉJION
.
SOIJS-MINISTRE, MINTSTÈRE DU REVENIJ NAT’ONAL.IMPÔT
Rwenue Canada Rovenu Canada
Tlrxation lmpôt
Appeals Branch
i
Dantel J. Lavi-gne
2?53 Beriard Roacl
Pri-nce George, B.C.
V2K II,/+
I
Fle: Notice of Objectlon
TI.A7
Bev. 86
I
ll
I
I
District Oltlce
i
Taxation Centre
Date:
Vancouver
D. Devitt
Appea ls I 30 -22
.l
ti f]
\i
‘7
lflÊt”
t
I
1eB5
Taxation Year
The above Notice of Objection has been carefully considered and the Minister’s decision is included in the
following document: i:l
Notification of Confinnation for 19
-S.5
or being
Costs The Court may
Rerninder Advise the
‘l
I
I
lr
ili
t lotice of Ële-as$essment for 1 9
enclosed.
enclosed
forwarded under separate cover.
lf you clo not agree with this clecision, you have a right of appeal to oither the Tax Court of Canada or the
Federal Court of Canada.
Tirne Limit
Procedures
APPËAL TO THE TAX COURT OF CANADA
An appeal must be made within
g0
days from the date of malling of the Minister’s Notification.
No special form is required and there is no filing fee.
Simply set out a brief summary of the facts and the reasons for appealing the assessment or reassessment.
lnclude
*
an address for Servics
–
either your own or your representative.
Quote the district office or taxation centre identified above.
Send three copies by registered mail to:
Registrar of the Tax Court ol Canada
Centennial Towers
200 Kent Street
Ottawa, Canada
K1A OM1
award costs to a taxpayer on the disposition of the appeal.
Registrar of the Court and our Departrnent of any change of âddr€jss.
/\PPEAL TO TI{E FEDERAL GOURT OF CANAT}A
Tirne Lirnit
Procedures
Gosts The
A direct appealto this Court must also be filed within 90 days from the date of mailing of the
Minister’s Notification.
The Federal Court rules require that appeals be submitted in a prescribed manner. Full
particulars may be obtained from the local office of the Court’s Begistry in your area, or by
writing to:
Registrar of the Trial Division
Thé federal Court of Canada
‘
Ottawa, Canada
K1A OHg
Court may award costs to either party at its discretion’
(‘n) *{
,i:{{/”,-{/
Chief of Appeals )
Enclclsures
Registered
(Français au verso)
I’
\r
ti
I
I
ll
tI
I
I
i
B E T W E E N:
T-2020-BB
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVI SION
IN RE the Income Tax Act
DANIEL J. LAVIGNE,
– and -HER IVIAJESTY THE
QUEEN,
AFFIDAVIl
PATRICIA LEE, barris
the Municipality of
MAKE OATH AND SAY
Plaintlf f
,
I, SUSAN
Toronto, in City of
Provlnce
Defendant.
ter and soliciEor, of the
!Ietropolitan Toronto,
AS FOLLOWS: of Ontarlo,
t. I am eruployed in the Tax Ltttgation Section of the
Department of Justlce, have carriage of thls action and as such
have knowledge of the matters to whlch I herelnafter depose.
2. Attached as Exhibit “A”
to this rny Affldavit is a copy
of the Judgrnent of the Tax Court of Canada signed at Ottawa on
June 8, 1988 disrnissing an appeal by the PlainËiff Èo the Tax
Court r^rlth respect to his 1985 t,axatlon year. At Ëhe Tax Court
of Canada hearlng whereat I represented the Mlnlster of Natlonal
Revenue, 1t is my recollectlon that the Plalntiff conceded the
correctness of the assessment of tax.
3. On October 27, 1988, a Statement of Clairn f iled October
20,19BB with the Federal CourÉ purportedly belng an appeal from
the decision of the Tax Court of Canada dated June 8, f988 waa
Ft0EnÀ[ rounl 0r
00un rËnÉnnu 0u
ciltA0l
cnilA0[
D, L. MARTIN
RËGISTRY OFFICER . FONCTIONNATRE
DU
P
R
o
D
U
I
ï
FE
served upon the Deputy Attorney General of Canada. Attached as
Exhlbit
rrB’r
to Èhis my Affidavlt Ls a copy of the said Statemeïrt
of Claim.
4. By copy of a letter dated November 9r 1988, I advlsed
the Plaintiff that carriage of hls Federal Court acÈion had been
assigned to nêo I furËher indlcated that I hoped to be in a
positlon to file and serve the Defence 1n the near future and
that 1f he had any questions or comments ln the interim, to
contact me. Attached as Exhtblt “C’r to this rny Af f ldavlt 1s a
copy of the letter dated Novernber
g,
1988 to Mr. Lavlgne.
5.
7.
Subsequent to ExhibiÈ “C” herein, I drafted a letter
which was eventually forwarded to Mr. Lavigne on December 1,
1988. Thls letter set out that I lntended to brlng a Motion Èo
Strlke. AtÈae.hed as Exhibit ‘rI)”
hereln 1s a copy my letter dated
December I
,
I9B8 to Mr. Lavigne.
I
6, 0n December I, I988, I was’served wtth a Notice of
MoÈion and Affidavit by the Plaintiff wherein the Plaintiff seeks
Judgment.
The leEt,er dated December 1, 19BB to Mr. Lavigner
Exhibit “D”
herein, \iras not forwarded to Mr. Lavi-gne until after
the Notice of Motlon and supporting Affidavit had been served on
‘mêo Ilowever, Èhe said letter had been drafted and I had received
lnstructions from Revenue Canada to Move to Strike, prlor to
receipt of the sald Notlce of Motlon and Affldavlt.
B. A Notic.e of Motlon to strlke out the Plalntlffrs action
has been forwarded to the Plaintlff . AtËached as Exhibit
trE*
to
Ëhis my Affldavlt is a copy of the said lulotion.
E3r
9. This Affldavit is made to oppose a Motion for Judgrnent
filed by the PlainÈiff.
St^trORN BEF0RB me at the Ciry
of Toronto, ln the
Municipallty of Metropolltan
Toronto, Province of 0ntario
rhis
[W-
day or
W
19BB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
[
(-).
A COT”III{I S S IONER ETC .
SUSAN PATRICIA LEE
I
Oux Onurt nf
(ûnuuùu
B6-1901(rr)
DANIEL J. LAVIGNE,
,
Appe 11.tt t ,
V.
THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE,
Respondent.
\ppeal heard June i, 1988, at the
) i ty of Toronto, Ontar io
,
by
Christie A.C.J.T.C.
J.ounsel__at hear.i,lg
r’or the appe I I an t :
The appeIlant himseIf
Ior t,he respondent:
P. Lee
JUDGT'{ENT
I t i s ord ered and ad j udged
bhat the appeal. with respeet to the
t9B5 taxation year be and the same
is hereby d i smi ssed .
S igned at Ottawa ,
Canada,
t,his 8t,h day of JUD€r 1988.
D. H. CHRISTTE
C.
tE MINI STRE DU REVENU NATIONAL ,
intimé.
Appel entendu le 3 juin 1988 en la
ville de Toronto (Ontario) par
Christie J.e.A.C.I.
Proeureurs à I
t
audience
Pour Itappelant 3
L
I
appel ant 1u i-même
Pour If intimé 3
P. Lee
JUGEMENT
Par les présentes, i1 est
ordonné gue I’appel à t’égard de
ltannée d’imposition 1985 soit
rejeté.
S ig né à ot tawa
,
Canad a ,
ee
ge jour de juin
1988.
(ûnur
mnuùtenne
DAN I EL
llo
^.
t ulrpot
86-1901 (rT)
IAVTGNE,
appel aDt
r
ùe
it.nrr,f
ÏN THE FEDN}?AL
:
I
I
COURT OF CANADA
î-
TO,LÔ
E
TR IAL DTVÏS ION
IN RË THE
TlîCOIr{lI TAX ACT
DANIEL J. LAVIGNE
AND
HBR MAJESTY THE Q.UEEN
STATEMENT OF CIÂTM
i:l;,::
/
u
I
tç86
tvirrcB
TAXATIOI{ YEAR ÏS
OF CANADA DATED
P
R
o
D
U
I
T
I
;f
u
I
q
EDTNfiI
(OUAI
Or CANÂDA
COUR rÉNINNT DU (ANADA
:.
ocÏ e0 t38n
G. P. WATSûl.l
nEOGnY Oirtcil
–
foNcnoNNarrrt OU
ÎTORONTO, ONT.
(rrLED
THrs ed^DAy *oF
oQToBER. 19BB)
OF APPEAL TN RESPECT OF THE PT,AINTTFF’S 1gB5
HEREBY GT\IEN FROM TfiE DECÏSION OT THE TAX COURÎ
JUNE Bth, 19BB AND MAILED 0N JUNE 23rdr 1988.
STATEI’TENT OF FACTS
SïNOE 1980, THE PLAïNTIFï} PURSUANT TO HIS RECOGI,IITION OF
HIS EXISTEI{CE AS A MEI’IBER OF MANKIND HAS CHOSEN TO LT\TE IN A MANNER
RECONCILABIE WITH THE HTGHEST ASPIRATTONS OF MANKIND AS OPPOSED TO
LIVI}ÏG IN SILBNT ACO.UIESCENCE TO THE DATLY DEtsASEMENT OF LIFE AS
PRACTTCED AND CAUSED BY THOSE II/HO ACCEPT, CONDONE. T.ECALTZE AND
pRoMoTE
THE
ilRJGHTil
OF DIFFERING
||GO\TERNMENTSil ilNATIONSil, frpEopT,r:Sil,
”SOCTETIESII
. AND
IISO\IEREIGN
STATES’I TO PARTICIPATE TN AND FORCE THEIR
CITIZENS .FARTTCTPAT]ONS TN PLANS AND PREPARATTONS TH^A,T TNVOLVE.,EIIE WILL
AIID THE CAPACTTY TO I”IURDBR HUNDREDS OF MTLLTONS OF DEFENCELESS FELLOIÀI
HI]MA}I BETTTGS BY USE OF NUCLEAR AND OTHRR ITEAPONS OF MASS MURDER.
2, STNCE 1980, PURSUANT TO THA PLAINTIFFIS DECI,ARATION THAT HE
rS A FREE MAN ÏITTH .AN UNASSATIABÏ.D RTGHT AND CONCURRENT AND IINAVOIDABLE DUTY TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT THOSE FEARFUL AND COÏIIARDLY SOCTETTES
UIIO ALLOW THE GREED OF VII,E AND VTOLENT MEN TO
I’IÂWFULLYII
RISK
HIIMANTTY’ S \TERY EXISTENCE BY THE THREATENED USE OF NUCLEAR AND OTIIER
V/EAPONS OF MASS MURDER, THE PIA,INTIFF HAS REFUSED TO ETTHER FILE TAX
RETURNS OT PAY TA)GS TO THE DEFENDANT AS DEMANDED BY TTIE DEFENDANT
“AND
HAS CEASELESSLY CHALTENGED THE DEFENDANT TO DEVEIOP COURAGE
SUFFTCTENT TO CHARGE THE PIATNTTFF FOR WILLFULLY EVADING THE PAYI’MNT
OF TA)GS AND HA\[E THE MATTER PUT OVER FOR TRIAL BEFORE A JUDGE AND
JIIRY.
3, srNcc 1980, PTIRSUAtlll T0 THE
pLATNTTFF’S gnlmrs
AND MoRE s0
STI\TCE 1984 PURSUA}TT TO THE PIATNTIFF’ S DELI1MRY OF THE FOLLOUITNG
STATEMENT TO TI{E DEFENDANT:
cont t. …/’Z
A.
1o
{:
\\”.r’s’
at.
.: -‘
ûl
\}
‘
t
c”onftjo../Z
3.
,
STRS AND MADAMES,
ATTASHED FTIID A FHOTO-COPY OJ’A DEMAND TO PAy By YOUR AGENTS,
REVENIIE CAIVADA
Ï REJECT THAT DEMAND. T AM A FREE HUMAN BEII\ÏG ; Ï DO NOT BELONG TO
YOUR KIND.
Ï AM A FREE MAI’T AND HA\E BUT ONE I]FE TO LÏVE. T AM FORCED TO LÏVE ÏT
STDE BY STDE Ï/ITH FOOLS IIIIO HAVT NO CONCEPT OF FUfURE OR SENSE OF DTTTY
TO HUMANÏTY.
ANNTHTLATION OF ALL LIFE FORMS BY STUPTD, POriltER HUNGRY FOOLS SUCH AS
YOURSELVES TS AGONTZTNGLY POSSTBLE
T SEE NO PROSPECTS THAT YOU AND YOIJR KIND WTT,L E1TER ADDRESS YOTTRSELVES
TO THE PRESENT GRIM REALITY.
I ASK YOU: TO I[4{ERE SHOULD A (ONCERNED.
HUMAN BETNG TURN … II’TTTIOUT
BET}IG TIIRNED UPON? TO VIHICH COÛRT SHOULD HE ADDRESS HIS FEARS OF A
POLLUTED,/COUTRU]NATED FUTITRE? . …THAT TII’ILL LTSTEN? . .. AND DO
SOMETHT}IG? . .. .TO IIû{TCH ESTABLTSHMEI’TT JUDGE SI{OULD HE LOOK IIPON FOR
:
FATR DEALTI,TGS? … YOURS? .. HAH! !
suôUIO I coNTIIvUE? ……WOULD IT BE oF ANy UsE?
I AM FRBE. I DO IVOT BELOIYG TO YOIIR KTND.
YOU MAY Q.UBSTTOT\I IrY STAITCE. YOU SHOULD NOT DOIIBT MY DETERMIITATTON.
SIGI’IED … DANÏEL J. LAVIGNE
.. , O
‘
t THE PI,ATNTTFF HAS OPBNLY COU}TSET,ED OTHERS ON THEIR R]GHT AND
DUTY TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT ANY GOVERNI”IENT,/SOCIETY THAT IS SO IOST TO
COtrVARDICE, GREED AI’ID LUST FOR PO\IIER
^A,S
TO titIILLfULLY AND III,]LLINGLY
PARTTCTPATB TN A CO}TSPTRACY THAT RISKS HUMANTTY’ S \IERY EXTSTENCE. TTTE
DEFEllDAlrT, AII/ARE OF THB PIÂTNTTFFTS CONTXNUING ACTIONS IN THIS REGARD
HAS Â.LIOI/IED THE PLATNTIFF TO COIVTTNTTE THOSE ACTIONS ITIITHoUT HINDRANCE
OR I}ITERRUPTTON II’I ORDER TO AVOTD FURTHER PUBTTC CHALLENGES THAT THE
PLATITTIFF BE CHARGED BY THE DEFENDANT FOR WTITFUL EVASTON OF PAYMENT
OF TAXES AND THAT THE MATTER BE DECÏDED TN A PTIBLIC TRIAL BET’ORE A
JUDGE AND A JURY.
4. WITH THE EXCEPTION PI]RSUANT TO THE PLAINTIFF’S 1986 CHALLENGE
TO MR. ROBERI ROY, DIRECTOR, TA)(ATIoN, VANCOU\/ER AND MR. H.R. ROGERS,
DEPUTY MINISTER, NATTONAL REVENUE, BOTH HIRELINGS OF THE DET’ENDANT,
TTHERE]N THE PLATNTÏFF WAS TNT’ORMED BY THE TNDIVTDUAT, HIRELINGS THAT
THE
gË
PI,A,INTIFF V/OULD BE CHARGED l4rITH ïITILLFULLY EVADING PAYI’ENT OF
TNCOME TAXTS AI’ID THAT THE DEFENDAIVT IJYOULD
MOST CERTATNLY RTSK PT.ACING
rHE MATTER BEFORE A JURY AND SIIBSEQUENT THEREAFTER TO THE LOUD RHATORTC
OF BOTH HTREL]]YGS SPEAK]NG FOR THE DEFENDANT WI{EN THE DEFENDANT COÏIIED
FROM CHARGTT\TG THE PIAII\TTTFF; THE DEFENDANT HAS MADE IT ADES.UATELY CTIOAR
TO THE PIATNTIFF THAT THE DEFENDANT ïTILL REIY ON THE INDTVTDUAT
EXERCTSE OF POUJTR BY ‘TTS LEGAL ESTABLISHMENT TO SANCTION THE
”LEGAL
RIGHTil OF ITS AGENT IN THIS MATTER, REImNUE CANADA, TO USE WHATEVER
METHODS TNCLUDT}IG TI.IE USE OF LETHÀL FORCE TO COLIECT THE IIINCOI’IE TAXESIII
THE AMOUNT ASSESED, THAT THE DEFENDANT DEI’IAND^S Bn PAID TO IT BY TI{E
conlt…o /3
.l
c’ont
t.,.
o ./3
a
4N ..’PIÂTNTIFF AND THEREBY DETER OTfiERS FROM BELIEVTNG AND PUBIICLY
STATTNG AS THE PIAT}TTIFF BEITE\MS AND PUBLICLY STATES TTIAT THEY ALSO
HAVE AI{ UNASSAII,ABLE RIGHT AND UNAVOTDABI,E DUTY TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT
THE DEFENDAI\iT OR OTHERS OF }ITS I(TND STMIIÂRLY TNVOLI’:ED TN PREPARATTONS
TO ïI/AGE MASS MURDER.
5. THE PLATNTIFF RECOGNTZES THE POTENTIAL T’OR ANARCHY WITHTN
H]S DECTSIOIVS AND ACTIO}IS A}ID HOLDS THAT POTENTIAL RESULT A MORE
ACCEPTABLE RISK T}IAI\ THAT POSED BY THE ACTTONS OF THE DEFENDANT AND
HTS KTND IN PREPARI}IG TO WAGE ALL OUT NUCIEAR WAR OR THE GREATER
POTEI’TTIAL FOR THE UTTER DISSOLUTTON OF SOCTETY I’IIORLDWIDE POSED BY THE
DEVELOPMENT OF NEIIJ TECHI\IOIOGY ALLOI’UING THE MOST AVERAGE Otr’ ADULTS TO
BUTLD A WEAPON THE USE OF ï|JHICH IIIIOULD KILL HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS.
6.
\
-r;
ngn
pTaÏNTT}.F!
s REFUSALTO SUPPORT THE DEFENDANT
OR ANY OTHER VJ}IO LIKTI THE DEFEND^A,NÎ TS TNVOL1MD IN AN AGREEMENT WITH
OTHER NATIOIVS THAT TI{VOLVE THE UITLL AND CAPACITY OF flIE DEFENDANT AND
H IS KI}ID TO MURDER HUNDREDS OF MTLLTONS OF DEFENCEI,ESS HI]MAN BETNGS
rs îlor oNLy suppoRTABLE rN LAw, rr rs cENTRAL TO ALL LAtrtrs AND rr rs oF
THE UTMOST NECESSTTY FOR HUMANTTY’S COI{TTNUED SURVIVAL THAT ALL OTHER
HUI’,IAN BEI}TGS SI},TILARLY REFUSE TO SUPPORÎ THE DEFENDANT OR HIS KIND.
?. JUSTïCB .T.A. TWADDLE ïS CORRECT WHEN, -rN
EXPRESSTNG THE JUDGEMENT-5OR THE }.{AJORTTY OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA IN TITE CASE OF
RE McKAY ET AL A}TD THE GOVERNMENT OF MANITOBA 23 C.R.R. B AT PAGE
TI,IrELVE
rfTTlE
CITIZEIY PAYS A TAX: THE STATE USES TT NOT AS THE CITIZENS
I.{O}TEYTBUT AS PART OF A GENERAL PUBLIC FUNDil. FROM TIIIS Ir FOLLOWS
THAT HONOURABLE JUSTICB HADDY ERRED TN JERILYNN PRIOR \MRSUS HER MAJESTY
THE QuITTq.- counT FII,E T’To. T-1858-87 TRIAL DIVISToN
–
FEDERAL coTIRT TN
STATTNG THAT THERE TS NO I.IEXUS OF ANY KIND BETTTIEEN THE AMOUNT OF TAXES
PAYABI,E BY TTTE PI,AINTTFF AI{D THE EXPENDITURES MADE BY THE DETENDANT’ S
FEDERAL AUTHORTTY, rN THAT U/IIÏIOUT RECETVING THE FUNDS SOUGHT FROM THE
PIAINTTFF AND OTHERS POSSES,STNG STMII,AR BELTEFS, THE FEDERAL AUTHORITY
IS FORCED TO REDUGE SPE}TDTNG BY VIRTUE OF NOT HAVING THAT AMOUNT SOUGIT
AVAILABIE TO SPEND LNAVTNG lHE DEFENDANTTS FEDERAL AUTHORITY ïTTTH
SEVTRE CHOTCES iTge COIYTINIIE TO INFIÂME THE PASSTONS OF THOSE UPON
WHosE lAX DOLLARS THEY RELY IltlIEN SPENDING TAX DOIIÂRS TO TRAIN IMPRESSIO}IABIE YOTING I”IEN AIVD WOMEM TO MIIRDER OTHER HÏ]MAN BEÏNGS [‘HEN ORDERED
TO DO SO ÏI\T THE NAME OF THE DET’ENDANT OR SPEND THOSE AVATIJIBTE DOLLARS
FOR THE MORAL, I'{ORMAL AI,ID ORDERLY PROCESSES OF SOCIETY.
ETTHER THE
DEFE}IDA}TTI S CONSTTTUTION OR CHARTER OF RTGHTS . IN HIS–IPPEAL BEFORE îTIE
TAX CPURI’OF CAT{ADA (86-19OI IT) IN THAT HE ACKNOIIIT.^EDGED BEFORE HAND
THAT WHILE THOSE DOCUMEMS ARE SAID TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OI’ CITIZENS,
THEY CONTAT]f VERY LITTI,E IN THEIR RESPECTT\IE PAGES TTIAT TENDS TO
GUARANTEE THE R]GHT OF AN TNDTVIDUAL TO ACT AS A HI]MAN BEING THAT CAN
NOT BB SUBSEQTJEIYTLY DENTED BY TI{E DEFENDANT’ S RELTANCE ON CIÂUSES SUgH
AS
”A
DEMONSTRABLY LTMTTED FREEDOM TN A FRAE AND DEMOCRAÎIC SOCTETY’I.
conf t.o.o /t+
conf to.o o ./4
g. (a)punsutNT îo THE RIILES 0F THE INCOME TAx COITRT OF ÛANADA,
TI.IE REGTSTRAR OF THAT COIIRT SHALL, Ot’t DEMAItrD, SUPPLY THE PIAINTIFF
II/ITH
BTANK SUBPOBNAS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE APPEAL. (b)
THE PLATNTIFF
BY REGISTERED IETTER DATED JA.I{UARY 18, 198? REqTIESTED THAÎ THE REGISTRAR
TONWARD SUPOET{AS SUFFTCIENT 1O COMPEL THE ATTENDANCE AT COURT OF EACH
AND EVERY ME},{BER OF THE HOUSE OF COI’II{ONS. (c)
TUN REGISTRAR OF THE
COIIRT TN A SUBSEQIIBJ’TTCO}IVERSATION IIIITTH THE PLATNTTFF STATED THAT HE
$|OULD IIOT SUPPLY THE PIAII’ITIFF ll,ITH THE REQUïRED SUBPOENAS AS IN HTS
OPIllIOlv THE PLAIITTIFFT S qUESTIOLIIG
OF THE MEMBERS 0F THE HOUSI OF
COMI”îO}IS I/I/OULD EMBARASS THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA.
10. THE MATTER IS OF SUCH OVER-RÏD]NG PIIBLÏC ÏNTEREST THAT THE
COURT SI]OULD SUMMARTLY REJECT ANY APPLICATION BY THE DEFENDANT FOR AN
ORDER STRIKI}IG OUT THE PLATI’ITTFF’ S STATEMENT OF CI,ÀIM AS HAVING NO
REASONABTE CAUSE OE ACTTOTV AS
IUCH
AN ORDER WOULD ACT TO HAVE THE
DEFENDANT AI\TD TTS LEGAL ESTABLISHMENT AVOTD DEALTNG IJIIITI{
THE FACT OF
THE]R PERSONAL A}.tD COMI,IO}I T}ITEREST AND INVOL\MMENT TN THE PERPETUATTON
OF THE ARIqS RACE. THETR SEEKING SUCH AN ORDER WOULD BE THE DMECT
RE,SUT,TOF THEIR !’JANTING T\TO FURTHER PIIBLICTTY IN TT{E MATTER. THTS TS
VERTFIED BY TI{ETR ABSOLUTE DISREGARD OF THE PIAINTIFF’S STIALI,ENGE
PUBLTSHED PROI,ITNE}ITLY O}I THB ED]TORIAL PAGE OF THE TORONÎO STAR ON
JUNE 16, 198?.
‘HERETI\I
REPRODUCED
I
PERRII\I BEATTY’ S EXPOSIIRE TO AND DEALIwGS 1ITITT{ fHE SMILING
MANIPUI,ATORS OF I\TATO’ S VARTOUS MITTTARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPIETES CONFTRMS
THB CRIDO,
r’POUJIR
CORRUPTS …ABSOLUTE POUTER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELYTT.
V/ITH }IETTHER BEATTY AS RE TENUE M]NISTER, NOR HTS SUCSESSOR,
ELMER MacKAY HAVING THB COIIRAGE TO USE THEIR IÂlIlSr COIIRTS AND JUDGES TO
CHAT,LENGE
,MY
ABSOLUTE R]IFUSAL TO PAY
“TA)GS
OR TILE TAX RETI]RNS TO A
.
sOcIE$Y RACTTIG TO DTSA,STER, ]rOt’J CAIY BEATTY NOïy JUSTIFY ASKING FOR $2OO
BTLLTON TO FI]RTHT]R ACC]IIIIRATE THAT RACE? HOIII CAN MacKAY JUSTIFY
ATTEMPTS TO HA\[E CONSCTENTTOUS OBJÊCTORS TO MASS MURDER PA,Y FOR
BEATTY’S ENRICHMENT OF THE VJORLD’S ARMS MERCHANTS?
lltlHrtE THE MAJORTTYTAS LOST AND COWARDLY FOOLS MAY CHOOSE TO
EMBRACE THE MADNESS OF GREED, THAT DOES TERMINATE THE RTGIT AND DUTY
OF THE MTNORITY TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT POLTCIES OR SOCIETTES THAT
ENDANGER HUMANTTY’ S EXISTENCE.
IF BBATTY, MacKAY, MULRONEY ET At ARE AS COURAGEOUS AS THEY
IryOULD HAVE ALL BELIEVE, THEY SHOULD RTSK PI,ACING MY REFUSAL BEFORE A
JURY AND LET A COMPLETE AIVD FAIR JUDTCTAL PROCESS RT’I,E ON TTIE
IIRTGITT
A}TD DUTY” OF TI\TDTVTDUALS TO REFUSE TO FUND PREPARATTONS THAT TNVOL\TE
THB DENIAL OF OUR HUMANITY, RISI$ 0F OUR EXTINCTION AS A SPECIES AND
THE CONTI}IUII\G DESTRUCTTOI{ OF OIIR ENVTRONMENT.
OTHER ACTTVISTS SHOULD BAI,ANCE THEIR STRIVING FOR PUBLÏC
ACCEPTAI{CE AGAINST THE TI’IMEDIACY OT’ THE DANGER AND CONSIDER TT THEIR
SPECIAL DUTY TO PARTTCTPATE IN A STMITAR REFUSAL.
sIGNBD: DANIEL J. I,AVïGNE, FOUNDER,/CO-ORDINATOR,
TITTERNATTONAL HTIMANITY I{OUSE
conit…./5
11. BY
1985 TAX YEAR
12, BY
APPEAI,ED TIIE
NOTTCE OF ASSESSMET,TT DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 1986 FOR THE
THE DEFENDAT’IT ASSESSED THE PLATNTIFF THE SUM OF ltj,7g?.?l
NOTICE OF APPEAL DATED SEPTAMBER 8, 1986 THE PLATNTTFF
ASSESSME}IT.
a’
14.
I}I A
15.
20.
13. BY NOTICE oF OONFIRI’IATION DATED NOVEMBER 7, 1986 THE
DEFBNDAIIT COIIFIRI’CID THB ASSESSI’IEI,TT.
THE TAX COURT OF CAN^A,DA DISMTSSED THE PIAINTIFF’S APPEAT,
JUDGBMENT DATED JU}IE B, 1988.
THE PI,ATI\TTTFF ÏN TTTS APPEAL BEFORE THE TAX COURT OF CANADA
86-1901(rr) DTD, Ilr THAT COURT,STATE THAT THE COURT THROUGH rTS
RELATTONSHTP I]iITTH TI{E DEFE}TDANT- t|tlAs TN A VTSIBLE, COGNIZABIE,CRTTTCAL
,
AT’ID CRUCIAL COI{FLICT OF INTEREST U/TTH l}IE HIIMBLE SUGGESTION THAT THE
couRT cour,D Nor I{EAR TI{E MATTER WITHOUT GIVING RÏSE TO THE
QUESTION
OF BIAS.
16. NO 1/’N ]TTE]’T LAVI EXISTS BY I/ffi”I I CH THB
17. T}IE DEFEI{DAI’IT PUBLÏ CLY
THAT TT TS A PEOPLE l|,HO I,’/TLLFULLY
T}IE TR. “CHR IST IAI\T HER ITA GE AND THE
OF’ I'{ATI TOUND I]'{ ALL RELTGIOIVS.
PRCF’ESSI}IG SIMILAR BELIETS CAI.T SUPPORT THETR
EXTSTE}ICE, THEIIT BIRTI{ AS THA RESULT OF THB
JCII{II\TG CF TV/O I]UI,IAN BEI}{GS GRACES THBM TI{ITH
DUTY TC KTLI,
NO
OTI{ER I{UI,îAT’Ï BEI}.IG OR RISK THB
TT UI'{A]’T BE II’trG.
PI,ATI’TTIFF AND OTHERS
INSÏSTENCB THAT TT{EÏR
CONSTRUCTIVB AND LOVING
AN BTERI’IAL RIGHT AND
LÏFB OF ANY OTHER
STATES THAT TT RBLIBS ON THB BTBI,E;
CHOOSB AND EMBRACB THTI GUIDANCE OT
UNT\IERSAL BBLIEF IN THE BROTHERHOOD
cOnf t. o.. /6
18. TI{E TTFTH COI”IMANDMANT. OF TI{E DEFENDAIVTIS CHRISTIAN GOD SIATES;
IITHOU
SHALL NOT KÏLLII
B. STATUTORY PROVTSTONS AI.ID REASONS lfiITCH THE PLAT}IIITFF
Ï}TTENDS TO SUBMÏT.
19. THE PIATI{TTFF HUMBLY BRTNGS TO THE COURTTS NOTICE THAT TTIE
DEFETIDANT AND OTHBRS OF ]TS KÏ]VD HAVE FATTED STNCE THE DAVIN OF TIME
TO PT,ACE rlrro THE]R CONSTITUTïONS, STATUTES OR orHER LEGAL MECHANICISMS
AND TN THE CASE OF THE DEFENDANT, THE DEFENDANTTS CONSTTTUTIoN AND
CHARTBR OF RIGHTS; Al{Y RTGHTS’ LAWS OR OTHER PROVTSIONS By UIHICH THE
PLAINTITF AND OTIITNS POSSESSTI{G SIMIIAR BELTEFS WOULD HAYE A LEGAL
RIGHT TO REFUSE TO PAY TA)CES TO OR OTHERïIISE SUPPORT SUCH AS THE
DEFENDA}TT.
THE
prAn{TrFF
RELTES,
ÏNTAR ALIA, OI{.o.oo.o
. | //
COn’1.c../6
‘i+a_
.’
,,
,#.
”
i
20. (a)
THE COURTT S RECOGNITION AND ACCEPTANCE 0F Hls OBJECTI\rES
U’AND
THE HopE TI{AT TI’E couRT v/rLL REcocNrzE THE DïsERVrcE THAT ALL
0OTJRTS DO TO THEIRSETVES AI’TD ALL OTHERS tm{E}r THEY CONTINUE, ON BE}IALF
OF SUCH AS THE DEFE}TDA}IT AND HTS KIND THROUGTT TITETR DEPENDE}ICE OIV A
COPIPLEX AllD I,IIXTURE 0F IAWS AllD MIG{T,TO DENY THE RIGHT OF HrUMAtrrl BEINGS
TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT PREPARATTONS TO COMMIT MASS MTIRDER.
(b)
TH]T COURT’S RECOGNITION A}ID ACCEPTANCE OF HTS MOST
SOLEI’,îI{ BBLTEF THAT ASSOCIATE CHTEF JUSTTCE CHRTSTTE ERRED TTT THAT HE
FAII,ED TO FIRST DEAL PROPERIJ WITH THE
QUESTION OF HTS COIIRT BEING TN
A POSSTBI,E CONFLTCT OF TNTEREST BEFORE GIVTNG HIS DECISTON. THE RESULT
OF \’II{ICH TS NOII/ SEEIV BY SOME AS ACCEDTNG TO THE DEFENDANT’S DETERMTNATTON THAT NO CANADIAN CTTTZEI{ EVER BE GRANTED THE IÀUMUL NIGIIT TO
REFUSE TO SUPPORT THE DEFENDANT T1{ROUGH THE ïIIII]TOLDTNG OF.TA)(ES E\IEN
OUGI{ THE DEFENDAI\TI S ACTTONS },IAY VfST,L ITBMAND. .A,ND REQ.UTRE SUgH ABSOLUTE
gESSATION.
20,. (c)
THE colIRT’s REcocI{TTIoN o*orr*.9*t€PTANcE oF HIs Mos[
SOTjEMN BELIEF THAT ASSOCIATE CHïEF JUSTICEIERRED TN COI,ITïNUING TO HEAR
THB I”IATTER RATHER THAN DTRECTTNG THAT TT BE HEARD BEFORE A JUDGE AND
JIIRY OR SOI,IE SUCH OTHER ARRANGEMENT !’II{EN THE QIIESTION OF TITJHO PAYS HIS
SALARY AIVD THE ASSOCIATED COSTS OF THE COURT AROSE,AS A DECISTOI{ IN
FAVOR OF THE PLAT}.ITIFF WOULD SOO]V PUT THE DEFE}IDANTI S ABILITY TO PAY
JUSTICE C}IRISTIE AI{D ]NDEED ALL OF THE DEFENDAI’IT’ S T,EGAL ESTABLISHMENT
AT RISK; THAT ASSOCIATE CHIEF JUSTICE CIIRISTIE AND IITS COURT WERE IN A
CONFLICT OF ÏIYTBREST.
20. (d)
THE COURT’S RL”COGIfITIOII AND ACCEPTANCE OI. HIS MOST SOLEI,IN
BETTEF TITAT ASSOCTATE CHTEF JUST]CE CHRISTIE ERRED TN RELYTNG ON THE
FACT TT{AT THE PIAINTIFF I{AD I’loT RATSED ANY POINTS 0F IAW BY W}IICH HE
COULD CONSIDER VACATÏI\TG THE ASSESSMENT ÏN PASSING JUDGEX’,IENT. I U,HEN
JUSTTCE CHRTSTTE K]’IEÏrl TN FACT THAT THERE ARE NO PROVTSIONS OR LAIVS
IIIITHTN
TT{E DEFENDAIVT’S CO}ISTITUTIO}I OR CHARTER OF RISITS BY IIIIITCH THE
PLAI}TTIFF COULD HA\T8 RAISED AI’I ARCUMENT BASED DN TÂW IN FAVOIIR OF HIS
APPEAL; AND THAT JUSTTCB 0HRISTTE KNEÏll, OR SHOULD HAW KNOWNI THAT A
MATTER SI]CH AS THIS WOULD OBLIGATE HTM TO LOOK BEYOND THE ABSENCA OF
WRTTTEN LAII/ FAVORTNG THE PIATNTIFFI S APPEAT, AND CONSIDER THE COMMON I,A,UI
A}ID THE ESSENCE OF LAW lffiITCH THE PLAINTIFT BELIE\TES WOULD HOLD AS MOST
FOOLISH, UNLAVJFULL AI\TD REPREHENSIBI,E THE DEFENDANTIS DEIqAND THAT THE
PLATITTTFF PAY Hït'{ MONIES WHEN, ‘AFTER THE PAYMENT 0F SUCH MoNIES INTO A
COMMOI{ FU}’TD THE P],AÏ}ITÏFF HAS NO SAY IN HOI’ll IT ]S SPtsNT WrrUT’rAËCrr-iir.r
DEFBNDANT A}iD THE PI,A,TT’îTIFF KI{OI|I/ THAT THE DEFENDANT TI/ILL CONTIIYTIE TO
SPEND A PORTION OF THOSE PUBLIC !10}IIES.iTHROUGII HIS FEDERAT AUTHORITY
ON PREPARATIONS I]{VOLVTI\iG THE DEFEI\TDAIVT’ S lÂIILL AND CAPACITY TO ORDER
THE DEATITS OT }IU}TDREDS OF MTLLIO}IS OF THE PI,A,II{TTFFI S FELLOïII DEFENCELESS HUMAI’I BE]NGS AI\ID RTSK THEREBY THE PLAINTIFFI S IIFE BY RETALIATORY
DESTRUCTION FROIq rHE DEFEI”IDAMT SilENEMyn lffitO, IN A MANNER SIMILAR TO
THE DEFBNDA}IT, ALSO FORCES HTS CITTZENS TO SUPPORT PREPARATIONS TO
V’IAGE MASS l”lURDERo
)
20.
COnf tooo r/?
!
tl
”
COnf t.o.o/?
1-r
I
to. (e)
THE corrRTts R’cocNrrïoïv AND AccEprANcE oF Hrs rqosr soï.El4N
Veu],TEFTHATAssocIATEcHIEFJUsTIcEcHRIsTIEERREDINHIsAPPROAcH1o
HIS DECTSION BY DEPENDTT.IG UPON THE VARIOU.S PROVISTONS OF THE DEFENDA}IT’S
cHARTER oF RrcHTs tllsrcg onnùoh cTTTZEN rHE RreHT TO REFusE To
pARTrcrPATE rN HTS Al’rD OTHERS DE^STRUCTIoIÏ,AS lHE PLAINTIFF DID NOT BASE HIS
APPEAL 0II AlrY PROVïSIO}I OF THE CHARTER 0F RïGHTS. T0 CLARTFY TIIïS POINT,
JUSTTCE CHRTSTTE ASKED TfiE PIÂT}TTIFF TF HE WOULD SAY U}IDER OAÎH THAT HE
u/As RESPoNSTBLE FOl? THE COI’ITB}ITS OF A I,ETTER DATED NOVEMBER 21, 1986
T0 THE REGISTRAR OF TIII TAX COURT. HOIÀ/EVERTTHIS LETTER M{TCH DID COI’ITATI,I
A REFEREI\TCE TO THE CIIART:IIR OF RTGITS WAS SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF
FILÏT{G THE APPBAL AIVD i’/AS T.IOT TO BE PRESENTED [O THE COTIRT FOR REVÏEVI.
THE RUIES FOR THE FILTNG OF AN ÂPPEAL REQUIRED THE GIVTNG OF A REASON,
THAT I,BTTER FUI,FTLLED THAT FUNCTION FOR THE PIÂTNTIFF AND NO OTTIER. THE
PLAINTIFF, IN ACCEPTIT{G RESPONSTBTLITY FOR THAT LETTER DTD NOT DRAW
Trrar LETTER BEFoRE JUsrrcE cunlsrrË’FoR THE
pIIRposEs
oF Hrs ÀppEAL.
THE PLAT}TTIFf RBLTED SOLELY ON THE TRUTfi OF THE FACTS CONTATNED TN
THE NOTICE OF OBJECTTON DATED SEPTEMBER B, 1986 HERETN REPRODUCED:
II
I OBJECT TO THE ATTACHED ASSESSMENT FOR THE FOLI,OIÂIING AIÏD
OTHER REASO}IS OF WH]CH YOU SI{ALL BE MADE AVIARE.
youn
co\mRltl”lEl’iT, YouR SccInTY, rs GUTLTY OF A WITLFUL INVOI\IEMENT IN THE
GROSS TI'{MORALTTY/Ti’ISATTTTY OT THE NUCT,EAR AR},IS RACE; THE EI\ID OT’ W{TCH
SHALL, TN,ALL PROBABTLITY, BE HERALDED BY TEI{S OF THOUSANDS 0F LOUD
AND DEADLY EXPLOSIOIVS OF ATOMIC, BIOLOGICAL, CHEIVIICAL AND HYDROGEN BOMBS.
}IO GOVERNI”IBI,IT OI? SOCTETY CAT,.T CI,AÏM THA
IIRTGHTII
TO SO VTLBLY RÏSK THE
VERY EXTINCTIOI’I oF l'{A}ll(IND; TO SO IVANTONLY AIVD CONTEI’IPTUOUSLY DEGRADE
A}TD DESTROY THE VERY
”IJUI{A}TTTYII
OF OIIR PRESENT LTVES. NO SUCHIIR]GHTII
nY Tqrrr c
Dz\’LvLu.
MY I]UMAIYITY, THE FACT AND REASON OF MY EXTSTENCE AS A HIHAN BETNG
PNNT E,T’ITS I,iN AND ABSOLUTELY FORBTDS ME FROM A]DING OR ASSISTTNG THOSE
lrllHO SO ITILLFULLY, VTLELY AIVD CONTEMPTUOUSLY. R’ISK TIin ÏiERy ImINCTION
OF I’IANKTND.
Ï ASK AND DEMAND THAT THÏS ASSESSI”IENT BEVACATED;
PAY BACI( TO },18 ALL TÆ(ES E\MR COLLECTED BY THEM
WHATE\MR FORI’,IS THBY EMPLOYED. ,
THAT YOUR GOVMNMENT
FROM I\M TN ALL AND
I ASK AND HOPE THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT DE\JIEIOPS-;BACKBONE SUFFTCÏENT TO
SAY
IINOII’
TO TOSE III’HO IryOULD HAVE CANADA BE PARTY TO A MURDEROUS MAD}TESS.
T ASK A}ID HOPE THAT YOU RECOGNIZE YOIIR DUTY IN TTTTS MATTERE
.
IGNED DANIEL J. LAVIGIiTE, MEMBER, MANKTND
.:.,?.THE COI\ITENTS OF VIHICH NOTïCE OF OBdECTïON ASSOCIAÎE CHïEF JUSTI0E
CHRISTTE FAIT,ED T0 ADDRESS AND SPEAK ææl{ TO BECA,USE, ïN THE PIATNTIF!,| S
MOST SOLBMI\I BL-LIEF, OF THE \mRY POSSïBIE CONSEQTTENTIAL DAMAGE TO THE
D]TFENDAIYT AI{D THROUGH THE NEXUS BETV’EEN THE DEFENDANT AND THE DEFENDANTI S
LEGAL ESTABLTSIIMENT, THE VERY STRONG POSSIBILITY OF THE COURTS BETNS
}IELD IIY CO}ITEMPT A}ID DISREPUTE UPON THE TRUTHS CO}TTAINED THERE TN
BECOMTNG PUBLICLY KIVOINT TN VIEUII OT’ THE HISTORICAL AND TRADTTIONAI
RuLTIycs By cormis mn rryoRLD ovER DulrvrNc TNDTvTDUALs rREE cnorcn rN
THE T.{ATTER OF A PUBLIC V/TLL TO MIIRDER.
COn?f
t…r/B
‘.con
I
t. o o . /B
(f)
THB coURT’s RIooGI{TTTON AND AccEPTANcE oF THE nabt THAT
Tr{E REGTSTRAR OF THE TAX COITRT OF CAI{ADA HAD A DUTY, OUTLTNED II\T U{E :
cotrsoLIDATED REGULATTONS OF CAIIADA (1978)
CHAPTER 1513, TAX REVIEI]I/
BOARD ACT, TAX REVTBW BOARD RUI,BS, RUIE TI’TEL\E, TO SUPPLY THE PLATNTIFF
tll/rTH suBpoElrAs FoR THB PURPOSE 0F THE APPEAL; AND THïS COIIRTT;S FURTTIAR
RECocï’lITIOl’l AND ACCEPÎANCE THAT THE REGTSTRAR’ S REFUSAL TO SUPPLY
TI{OSE SUBPOE}IAS TI’ITERFERED ï-/ITII THE PI,AI}trTIFF’ S RTG}II TO HAVE EACH AND
EVERY I{EI’IBNR OF THE HCUSE OF COI.4},10I{S PRBSENT IN THE COURT TO ASK
THEI'{, ONB BY O}lE AND TO ANSï,IER ETTHER YES OR IVO TO THE QUESTTON,
iÎIVOULD
YOU PARTTCTPATE T}T I,A.UI.ïCHING THA ÏUORLD TNTO OBLIVION GTVEN THAT AN
IMPEI.IDTNG STATE OT V{AR-HAD CREATED IN SOME OF YOU AN ANXIETY TO BE T}IE
FIRST TO USE }TUCLAAR \I/EAPONS IN lHE HOPE OF ],TMTTTNG THE DBSTRUCTTOTT
TIIAT YOU FEARED WOULD SUBSEQIIENTLY FALL UPON YOU?; AND THIS COITRTIS
FIIRTHER RECOGNTTTON A}ID ACCEPTATICE THAT THE REGTSTRAR, BY HIS REFUSAL,
By Hrs TAKTNc A
posrrrory
ro
pÈecT,ûùu
rgn
possrBLn
EMBARAssMENT oF
HTs EuproynÉ, THE DEFENDAITIT; THE REcrsrRAR or rHE TAX counT oF cANADA
DETRACTED FROI.{ THtr PIAINTTFFI S ABIT,ITY TO PROPERLY PRESANT HÏS APPEAL
AND THAT THE PEGISTRAR OF THE TAX COURT OF CANADA HAS CAU.qED THE PROPER
ADI}4TI;T^STRATTON OF JUSTICE TO BE HELD IN CO}ITEMPT AND DISREPUTE.
20. (
e) THE COURT’ S RECOGI\TITION AtlD ACCEPTANCE OF THE PIAïMIï’F’|S
I.{OST SOLEI.IT{ RELTA}TCE OII THTS COURTIS.AIIIARENESS THAT HUMANTTYIS CONTII\ruED
EXISTENCT IS AT GREAT RTSK; THAT THE EXTSTENCE OF AND THE VTILL TO USE
IIUCIEAR A}TD OTHER iIIJ’IIAPOI{S OF MASS MIIRDER HAS NOT COI’IE ABOUT BECAUSE OF
Ti”ÏE GEIfERAL \'[ILL OF HUI\’IAIETTY THAT IIIE SHOULD LI\M UNDER SUSH A THREAT
BUT RATHTTR BECAUSE OF THE FEAR, CO\]VARDICET GREED At\iD LUST FOR POWER
trXERCISED BY T]IE DEFEI{DAIIT AITD IIIS KIND THROUGI{OUT THE lllORLD; THAT IT
rs Tr-ilîY, Trrn DEFEI,TDATIT AND HIS I(IlrD WORLDU/IDE IVHO HA\m CAUSED TO BE
PROTEÇTED BY
‘IiItrRTTTEiÏ
LAVJ” THE DESTRE OF THE VII,EST AND MO.qT VTOLENT
I”IEJ’I TO HAVE T}IOSE V/BAPOIVS IVTTH !fi{ICH TO CONDUCT THEIR POLICTES OF
A}.{ASSING MASST\TE V’IBALTH AND POVtrER REGARDLESS OF THE COST AIfD CONSES.TIENC
TO OTHERS; TFIAT HUI”IAI.I BEII,IGS SHOULD HA\IE THE PROTECTIO}II OF LAW WHEN
ASSERTIIVG THEIR ABSOLI]TE AND U}IASSAIIÂBLE RÏGIIT TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT
THOSB ÏllHO CONDEM}’I ALt OF HI]MANITY TO A \TERY PROBABTE TOTAT DESÎRUCTION
AND A DEFI}TTTE, CONTINUTNG AI\TD DEB]LITATING DESPATR; THAT A VERY
POSSIBLE CAUSE OF OIIR EIVVTRONMENTAT DRIFT TO DÏSASTER TS CAUSED BY
PBOPIE I]I/ORLDIIIIIDE HAVING GTVEN UP ALL ITOPE AND DEALTNG RECKLESSLY TI/ITTI
IVEI.I/ TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS.
20. (h)
THE COIIRT’S RECOG}ÏIT]ON THAT TIIE DUTY OF AT{ INDIVIDUAL
TO REFUSE TO COl,iI4rr MURDER, ESPECIAITY THE DUTY TO REFUSE TO COMMIT
I”fASS MTTRDER OT’I BEHALF OF A THIRD PARTY IS CENTRAL TO THE RULE OF TÂW;
THAT PRBPARAT]ONS TO IiIAGE NUCLEAR IJIIA&T\MN
THE DT]FENCELESS STATE OI’ MOST
cITIEs lvovl TARGETIID FoR DESTRUCTIOiq By ATOMIC A1,TD HyDROeElt BOMBS IN TI{E
EVENT 6p’
ALL OUT V’tARr ARE N0 LESS THAN PREPARATIONS TO COMI{IT MA,”SS MURDER
conr to o o o /9
l
\.
I
)^
c.-\-/ t
20.
THAT THE
DI]TY ITY
A CT AIVD
CTI{ER CF
210
a
l
conft.o.o /9
a
(h)
BKIIBITïNG THE l’,j’ILL AllD THE CAPACITY TO COMMIT MASS MURDER;
PI,ATIYTIFF HAS BOTH AN. U}IASSAILABLE RTGHT AND A}I UNAVOTDABLE
LAVJ TO REFUSE TO PARTICTPATE TN PREPARATTONS TO COI,IMTT SUCH AN
TH]Î RIGHT AND A DUTY TO REFUSE TO ASSTST THE DEFENDAI{T OR ANY
HIS KIl’lD ll,i COI{I\TITTII\ïG OR PREPARING TO COMMIT SUCH A}tr ACT,
JUSTICE J.A. TIIADDLE TS CORRECT WHEI\T ,
T}tr EXPRESSING THE
JUDGEI’IEIYT FOR THE IqAJORITY OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANTTOBA TN THE
CASE OF RE I’1cI(AY ET Al, AND THE GOVERI\.IMENT OF MANITOBA,23C.R.R. B AT
PAGE 12 IIE STATES
TITHE
CTTIZE}IS PAYS A TAX: THE STATE USES I1 NOT AS
THB CITIZEIVS I’IOI\TEY, BUT AS PART OF A GENERAL PI]BTTC FUNDrr. UIHILE THE
PIAT}TTIFF BELIE\ÆS THAT JUSTTCE HADDY ERRED IN THE MATTER OF !’NO NEXUS”
ïll JERTLYIIN PRrOR \mRSUS HER MAJESTY THE QIIEEN –
COITRT rIlE NO. T-1838-87 FEDERAL COITRT-TRIAÏ, DTVTSION, HIS DECISTON IN THAT MATTEn HAS BEEN
SUPPORTED BY A SUPERIOR COllRTr THE-DEFENDANTf S AGENI FOR COLLECTION oE
INCOME TAXE,9, REVlli\iUE CANADA, COwCUnS ÏI/ITH. THE RUttrNG AND ENJOYS THE
DECISION RET{DERED BY JUSTICE HADDY.
TF TI{DEBD THERE IS NO TTEXUS BETWEEN THA IùIONIES SECIIRED BY THE
DEFENDANTT S AcEllT FOR THE COLLECTIOI,I OF TNCOME TAxEs i,lVD THE DETENDANT’ S
ncÉnT FoR THE DTsBIIRsBME},IT OF THOsE I’Io}ITEs FROM A cE}ITRAL FUND, THERE
SHOULD BE }iO RELUCTAITCE VIIIATSON\MR OI.i THE PART OF THE DEFENDANTI S AGENT
FOR TI{B COLLIICTTON OF TNCOI/E TAXES, REVENITE CANADA, TO TULFTLL rTS
OBLIGATIO}IS AND CHARGE A}IY AND ALL WHO VilTLLFULLY EVADE PAYMENT OF TAXES
UNLESS TTilIRE IS INDEED AIIOTHER ltrEXUS, A DISCERNIBLE CO-JOïNII\IG OF
OTTIER INTERESTS BETÏ’TE]ïN TI-ICSE l’fi’Io COLLECT PUBLIC MO}IIES AND THOSE WTIO
SPE}TD TT. TIIE FACT TIIAT THE DEFFNDA}ITI S AGI]}TT FOR THE COLI.ECTION OF
:
IlTCOl,4n TAXES, RBVIùIIUII CAI'{ADA, STAI{DS AGHAST AT SUGçESTIOI\T OR CHALLEI{GE
THAT TT CAU,SE TIIE PLAï]’ITIFF| s V/ïLLFULL EVASION OI. TAXE.S TO BE HEARD
BEFORE A JURY COI’IFÏRI,XS, AT TEAST rO THE PLAINIIFF, THAT SUCH A NEXUS,
A NTSÔNNWIBI,E CO-JOTI’III.IG OF OTIIER TNTERESTS DOES TNDEED EXIST BETUMEN
THOSE RESPONSTBI,E TOR T}TE COLLACTTI\TG OF TNCOME TÆGS AND ALL THE VARIOU^S
OTHER TA)(ES FOR THE CEI\ITRAL FU}ID AI’]D THOSA ïiJHO RELY ON THAT FU}trD. THIS
IS CO}FIRMED BY THE FACT THAT THE DEFENDANTIS PRTME MINISTER AND ALL
OTHER MTNISTERS RESPONS]BLE FOR THE SPENDTNG OF THOSE FUNDS ON $IEIR
RESPECTIVE PRIORTTIES ARB DEPENDEIVT UPON THE MONTES WTTIITN THAT CENTRAL
FUIID Ar{D IT IS ïr[ THEIR CONSTANT, MUTUAL AND INDIVïDUAL INTERESTS TO
EIVSI]RE THAT NOTHING HAPPENS TO SEIMRELY DISRUPT THE RES.UIRED FLO1III OF
MONIES T}ITO THAT FUI’ID. TC AFFTRM THTS ONE NEED ONLY ASK: SHOUT,D ANYTHTIrIG
SUCH AS THÉPI,ATNTIFFIS OBJECTT\TE.iOR SOMETHING STMII,AR SEVERELY TNTERT]PT
THE I\ÏORI’TAL FLOW OF TAX }.{OI’IÏES FROM THEÏR VARÏED SCOT]RCES INTO THE
CBNTRAL FUND, V,/OUI,D TilE DEFEMAilïT Bfi ABLE, TIIROUGH THE IONG TERM, TO
BOLSTER HIS CEIVTRAI, FU}ID TIIROUGH NATTONAL AND FOREIGN BORROWTNGS? THE
ANSUIER FOR ANYONB FAI'{ILIAR !”ITTH II{fiIRIVATIONAL MOilltTARY RISK AVOIDANCE
IS A RESOUIVDTI’trG
t’}trO!’I
conf t… ./tO
,LF
c’onf t.. o ,/lO
2’1 ,
conf t…. THE PIAINTIFF STROI\TGLY SUGGESTS THAT THBRB CAN BE NO
DOTIBT OF A IVEXUS AS BETI/IIEEI\I THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COLLECTION OF
PUBLTC MO}IIES AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE E)(PENDITTIRE OF fiIOSE SAMN
MOIVIES AND RIAFFIRMS JUSTTCB J.A. TWADDLE TN SAYING THAT ONCE COLLECTEI)
AND TN A PUBLIC FUI’ID A TAXPAYERI S TAX MONIES CAN NO LONGER BE THOUGITT
OF AS BELONGII\TG TO HIi’4 –
THEY ARE NOW IN THE HANDS OF THOSE UMO UNLL
SPEND THE}'{ TIV IVITATE\ru]R FASHION THE DEFENDANT’ S PARLTAMENT IflTLL ALLOW.
SHOULD SOME OF TIIOSE }’IONIES GO TO SOME PROJECT OF SOCIETAL STG}IIF]CAIVCE
VII{TCH THE TAXPAYER WOULD }IOT OTI{TRI]1TSE SUPPORT –
THAT SHOULD BE AND IS
ïN FACT ACCEPTABIE T0 SOCIETY; HOU|EVER, I,IIIEN THE PROPOSED SPENDING OF
PUBLTC MONTES ]NVOL\TES THE FUNDTNG OF PREPARATIONS TO },IIIRDER MA,SSÏ/O
TVUI.îBERS OF HUIqAlt BEil\GS, AND THE ONLY RECOIIRSE OF A CONSCIENTIOUS
ÎA)CPAYER I’IHO IS ALSO A CONSCIB}ITIOUS OBJECTOR TO WAR AND PREPARATIONS
FOR WAR ïS THE WITHOLDING OF THOSE TAX MONIES, TO WITHoLD THEREBY HIS
SUPPORT OF THOSE I’IOST HBINOUS\PREPARATIONS .iEVOLIIES AS AIV UNAVOIDABIE
DUTY OF SI]T’FJCTE]IT MORAL STAI’TDTI’TG AS TO WARRANT BETNG ACCEPTED AS A1.I
UNASSATI,ABIA RIGHT.
THE PLATIVTIFF MOST SOLEMNLY BELIE\TES AND STATES THAT A NEXI]S,
sucH As DESCRTBED ABOVE, A DISCERIVIBLE CO-JOINII\TG Or POLITICAL,
FT}1A}ICIAL AND IDEOTOGTCAL TNTEREsTs EXISTs BETIImE}I ALL PARf,TEs HERETo
OTHER THAN TIIE PI,A,II\TIFF. SHOULD THE PI,A,TNTIFF SUCCEED IN ENCOURAGTNG
vAsT l{ut”lBERS OF CONSCTET’TTIOUS TAXPAYERS T0 EMUIÂTE HIS ACTIoNS, THAT
IIEXUST THAT CO-JOïI\ïïIIG OF TIIEïR MUTUAL ïNTERESTS tiirOULD BE SEEN T0
EXTE}ID TO AND EN\ELOP ]{OT ONLY THE DEFENDA}IT AND HIS MANY MÏNISTERS
sucH As THE MII{TSTERS OF FrNAI’ICE, RE\IENI’E, DnFENCE, JUSTICE AND OrHElS,
TT VIOULD BE SBEN . TO EXTEND TO AND EI\IVELOP THE DBFE}IDANTI S LEGAT
ESTABLTSHMEI’IT ÏNCLUDIT{G THE COIIRTS.
C.
22.
RELIEF S’ôUGHT
I
TI{IT PIA TNTIFIT TI{EREFOR CIÂTIT{S :
(a)
TII/|T TllE APPEAL SI{OULD BE ALLOIIIED
OR
(b)
THAT ASSOCIATB CHIEF JUSTICE CHRÏSTIE’S DECI^SION
BE RESCINDED AND THE APPEAL BE BROUGI{T BEFORE A
JUDGE AIYD JIIRY
OR
(
c )
THAT AN Al4EllDED APPEALT STRUCTURED THROUGH CONSTRUCTWE
COI’1PROI.{ISES COI\TTAINI}IG THERETN THE SNVERAL CONCERNS OF
ALI, PARTTBS HERETO AND REFI,ECTTNG THEÏR COMMON AND
}ITGI]EST ASPIRATIONS FOR HIIMAN SOCIETY BE ALLOWED.
-;tf$i
‘\”r
”
r
:ted thisA.l).’doy of ….
I I{ TH]I FE]DBRAT,
TRIAL
I
COURT OF CA”}{ADA
/È
DrvÏs roH “n/ù
‘\
DAIVTEL J. LAVTGTIE
rflndTHE I'{ TNTSTBR OF NATTOTVAL RNINDNTE
STATEMB}TT OF CIÂII”I
NOTICE TO THtr DBFENDA}TT
You are required to file in the
\
Registry of the Federal Court of
Canada at the City of Ottawa or at
a local office, your defence to the
within statement of claim or
de claration wi-thin 10 days (
or such
other time as may be fixed by an
order for servlce ex juris or other
special order) from the service herêo:
in accordance with the. Rule of Court.
If you fail to file your defence
wlthin the t
j-me
above limit€ d
r
you
will be subject to have such
judgemen
given against you as the Court may
think
j ust upon the Plaintif f
t
s
own showing.
Note (
t
) copies of the Rules of court
information concerning local offices
of the Court and other necessary
information may be obtained upon
application to the Registry of this
Court at Ottawa r-
telophone
992*4238
,
or at any local office thereof.
(2)
This statement of claim or declaration is filed by:
Mr. Daniel J. Iavigne
P.O. Box 21 59
Square One Post Office
Mississauga, Ontaric
L5B 3c7
Plaj.nti ff
SERVICE
OF. R*T
ËËrirFlcAT’loîrl
Di:
NUË
c0P
ACl,riiled
tiris
Ac.,:el:i;c
lc
ol
de
zÊ
\
COPY
HET
IE CONFO
t;J”,
i::’::l ,l;1ï;,1 ?
Deptrty
Attr:
îfitt’!
C’:’enàrat
rrt Canada
sotrs-Procureur
#;;;d
du Çanada
1,.
l
t
I
-1
\
I
t
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
,T
I
‘t
I
I
1
a
I
i
l{ovêmber 9, IqBB
Ftr. DarrIeI. J. I,avlgne
[‘.û. Box 2159
$quare 0ne Post Offlce
Fl ISSï5SAUGA, 0ntarlo
L5B 3t7
Ilear titr:
973-31
i l;i:: i:: f::riirl,it C trrç ttitt;nti1!{îndt
rt:leri,::{.,1 /ri in tite rtlfiilrrvli til
?
D” ‘|-!^
|
-5oson
tat|Ci
O Læ.
M,bt, ti. i,uâ8 .
/t
l. -\’./
WL,)-æ
,”r i.- r:;ilrtnlS5lOn{tf, r:ft-\
*\
Re: [JanieI J.
*1,âvlgne
vr The
Queen
Trtnl Numher: T-2020-BB
()ur
Flle: TO.l6043l-1
Please be advlsed t.hat cârrlage of thla act, lon has hcen
asslgned to me.
r hope to be in I ponlttorr to file anrl Berve the Defcncc in
the neêr future. However, 1f you have any qucttlont
or
connents 1n the 1nÈerim, pleaee do flot heattâÈê to contaeË
nc.
Yours vÊry truly,
Patrlel,a Lee
Coun*eI, Tax Ilttgatlon
fci”fouto Regtonal Off lce
PL r ol
I
t
I
I
,
i
I
!
I
l
,t
I
t
l
I
l
:
i
I
\.
‘I
T*T
Department of Justice
Canada
1 Front Street West,
Suite 500,
Toronto, Ontario,
MSJ 1A5
!
Ministère de la Justice
Canada
1, rue Front ouest,
Pièce 500,
Toronto (Ontario)
MsJ 145
.December I,
I'{r. Danlel
P.O. Box 2L
Square 0ne
MISSISSAUGA
.L5Tl 3C7
De a r S i r :
I9BB
J. Lavigne
59
PosE Office
,
0nEarlo
Re: Danlel J.
Appeal No:
Our File:
Tel
97 3- 3 1 2 5
J” l; i,; i :, {: I /r i/., il
J-J r j
r$! tt’i irj rl rj r/ rt r, rt
r i’,/i:r r’,iirll f r”r in f lit: ft!
iiri
r:tt,i,
-Susânfut,’qio
lj,xgrrrr /,r:/ore rne llrr:;
UL ,1r,, .t
Mbel ,
{t.[),,
rv88.
lr*–‘
TAVIGNE v MNR
86-r901(rr)
TO. r60431-l
Further to rny letter of Novernber 9, tgBB and upon closer
revlew of your StatemenÈ of Clalm, I arn of t,he vLew t,haÈ tt
is not an appeal from an income tax assessment because you
are not dlsputlng the as\ess’m’ent.
‘
The assessmenC 1s Che
calculption of tax, l-nÈerest and penalty, 1f âny, payable
1n respecÈ of a taxâtion year, based on taxable l-ncome 1n
Ehat year. You do not seem Co be obJectlng Èo the
assessment 1tse1f. It is not clear Io me what the basts
of your acÈ1on 1s, otherwLse.
Accordingly, I 1nÈend to bring a Itot,lon to strlke the Ctaim
as not being an appeal from an lncorne tax assessmenC (or
from the judgment of Ehe Tax Court coneernlng the
assessment).
If you are purporÈ1ng to challenge the assessment,, then I
ask thât you amend Èhe staÈernenL of clalm to state clearly
the naEure of your obJectlons Èo the caLculatlon of tax or
t.axable Lncome.
If you do not amend the C1a1m, then I will lnclude as an
alEernatlve 1n my Mocion a request that you provide
particulars of the nat.ure of yôur challenge to the
assessmenE, thaÈ is, the calculation of tax, tnterest or
,-j*en41cy.
Yours very Ëruly,
PaÈricia Lee
Counsel, Tax LtClgaÈ1on
Toronco Regional Off ice
PL/bf
cc: i”ts. .J. Yu
Appeals, OEtawa
Canada
-l
{}il{J
T-2020-88
rt’Jur”crl
ta irA: afli’tlrlit t>f
,
-A-soo’fatr;c!
a LrÊrnognA,L count or ca,HA,ua,
– ! | ,t:.. l-ll
-r_,,
.l
)\rn
it:f,:tri’: tl’v: f iirl Ll/,-
d,:rr Çl
Mbq,
it.D,,;v& TRIAL DIVISION
IN RE the Income Tax Act
B E T W E E N:
DANIEL J. LAVIGNE,
PlalnË1f f
,
– and -‘
HBR I”IAJq.STY .,’THB QUEEN,
Def endant.
NOTICE OF HOTTON
TAKE NOTICE that an appllcarlon wlLl be made to thls
Ilonourable court on behalf of the Defendant at 330 unlverelty
Avenue, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontarlo on Monday, the t2th day of
December, l988 at lO orclock in thê forenoon or so soon
thereafter a6 the appllcatlon can be heard, for an Order:
I
1
i
;
(a) sErtklng out the SËatement of
and dismlsslng the actLon on
pursuanr ro Rule 4I9(1)(a) of
Court Rules, the Statement of
no reasonable cause of actlon
Claim hereln
Èhe basls that,
the Federal
Claim dlscloBes
;
(b) 1n the alternatlvêr that pursuant to Rule 415
of the Federal Court Rules, the
plalntrff
provlde partlculars as to the basls for Ëhe
appeal from hls assessment of taxi
1n the further al ternat lvê
r for an 0rder
grantlng the DefendanÈ aïr extenslon of time
wi thln whlch to f11e a Defenc€.’
(c)
AND TAKB NOTICE
be read the Statement of
oËher mat,erlal as counsel
permiË.
E2r
that 1n support of
Clalm, together wLth
may advLse and thls
the appltcatlon w111
such further and
Honourable Court
1988.
AND TO: I’1r. Danlel
P.O. Box 2I
Square One
T”lISSISSAUGA
L5B 3C7
J. Lavigne
59
Post Office
,
0ntarlo
,
The Admlnl s trator
Federal Court of Canada
Trlal DtvlsLon
300 Unlverslty Avenue
Bth Floor
TORONTO, Ontario
I,1 5 G 1R7
,\
DArED ar. roRoNro, onrarr.o, rht
“2!!:),
.,
fl*or*Lrg
-*v”tN
John C
,rDeputy
Sollcl
. Tait,
Attorney General of Canada
tor for the Defendant
t/\
l
‘..r
–T-2020-BB .
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
‘U
TR.ï AIf- D I.V,Ijl I !N
IN RE the Income Tax Act
i
B E T T^I E E N:
DANIBL J. LAVIGNE,
,
– and
r’
PlalnClf f
,
Def endant.
HER T’IAJE STY THE
QUEEN ,
NOTICE OF I,{OÏION
J. Paul Malette
Department of Justlce
Toronto Reglclnal Office
Sulte 500
I Front Street West
T0RONTO, Ont,arlo
I”15 J I A5
Tele: 973-3105
F1le: TO. 160431-l
‘i.,L’
T-2020-BB
rEpgRAL COURT O.F CANApé
TRIAL DIVISION
IN RE the Income Tax Act
B E T I^I E E N:
I-IER MAJESTY THE
DANIEL J. LAVIGNE,
and -Plaintlf f
,
QUEEN,
Defendant,
AFFIDAVIT
i
I
:,
,
it,
I
@’
,(‘
NO. T-2020-BB
TORONTO, ONTARTO, MONDAV, THE 12th DAy OF DECEMBER, lg88;
BEFORE: PE’IER A.K. GILES’,
ASSOCTATE SENIOR
BSQUÏRE,
PROTFiONOTARY.
BETWEET,I:
DANIEL J. LAVIGNE,
Plaint Lf f
,
_
and -./
HER },IAJESTY THE QUEEN.
De fen dafl t
r
Upon Motion dated the 2nd day of December, 19BB on
behalf of the Defendant, for an Order
(a) striking out the Statement of Claim herein and
dismissing the’action on the basis that, pursuant- to
Rule 419(1)(a) of the Fede::al Court Rules, the
Statement of Claim discloses no reasonable cause of
act-ion i
in the alternative, that pursuant to Rule 415 of the
Federal Court Rul-es, the Plaintiff provide
particulars as to the basis for the appeal from his
assessment of tax;
(Tr)
. /2
‘,
v
(c)
oRDER.
The s’tatement of claim is struck
reasonable cause of action. The action is
2
in the further alternative, for an Order granting
the Defendant an extension of time within which to
file a Defenee.
out as reveal ing nc)
dismissed.
“Peter A.K. Giles”
I HËRËBY CERTIFY
frua copy of the original
of lhe Federel Oourt of
\uc n
nqled tlrtsâ)fday ot
A. S.P.
thert tho above document is Êl
filed of record in the RegisttY
Canarla ttio
-*l
?.TfC** rJny
Mtct”-lnL
Hegistry
LfltF{Iti;
Of iice r
h
, r, .-!ts_.,__.,- j! t4i.ÊÛ
Courb NO. T-2020-BB
TORONTO, ONTARTO,
gffl-h{:ï:$l ffiryurt sf ffi’,nnethw
ftl,rtul ,,lHttrixrnn
\_
MONDAY, THE 12th DAy OF DECEIT{BER, 1988.
BEFORE:
PETER A. K. GÏLES,
ASSOCIATE SENIOR
ESQUTRE
PROTHONOTARY.
BETWEET\T:
DANIEL J. LAVIGNE.
P ]aint iff ,
and
HER IU]\JESTY THE QUEEN.
De fendant
Ilnnn Motion dated the 2nd day of December, lgBB on v}Jvr q arrs uqJ
behalf of the Defendant, for an Order:
(a) striking out the Statement of Claim herein and
dismissing the action on the basis that, pursuant to
Rule 4L9 (
I )
( a ) of the Federal CourL Rules, the
S’tatement of Clai-m discl-oses no reasonable cause of
, action;
in the alternative, that pursuant to RuIe 4l-5 of the
Federal Court Rules, the Plaintiff provide
particulars as to the basis for the appeal from his
assessment of taxi
Ff;T,ËHAL (:OURT
i}F ÛÂ}ÛÀDÀ
00un rÉnÉnnin
fiiJ cAf,lAItA
F
F
l’,,F
Ë r:*,,.
DIC îe l.qu3
$
Oh.
Mtfi{ËL LOH-rE
+
FIEÊISTRY
OFFICEfr *
FOfIÇTIOIiNAIRE
OU GRËFFË
TORONTÛ,-ffi
(b)
. /2
(c)
_@jR:
2
j-n
the f urther al ternat ive
,
the Defendant an extension of
file a Defence.
for an O:r:der
t ime wi th in
gran t ing
which to
-y’
#t.-‘
tui,r’
tLÉ'[t*::”n
t.l
“”/*â*-;
u”
V”Éa#o-r’ a, *-**4
/#a-/Arè*’Êa-to-é*&
44r**e
,; M,o*otnuf’u/
Court No. T-2020-88
ËÉl*hûr:ffI
ffi.awrt Ltt
(ktnuhn
‘ffirixI
Ftrtrtsn
ToRoNTo, oNTARro, MoNDAy, *”” iran DAy oF DE.EMBER, 1988.
BEFORE:
BETWE
PETER A. K. GILES,
ASSOCIATE SE}{IOR
EN:
ESQUIRE f
PROTHONOTARY.
DANIEL J. LAVTGNE,
Plaintiff,
– and
HER IT{AJESTY THE QUEEN.
;x
S{.Dsf endant.
‘j ;.. ,.3*
,r.
“.,4 “.
r*
or’, J
t!’
*”
”'”=’
**j”
.r'”‘
*
Upon Irlotion dated the 1st day..oË”*,ne&nr-f:eir,t443e-A
]ô”
behalf of Lhe Plaintif f
,
for such Judrgmerr’t”- gèn,’:hê'”çoult'”imâ!
rhink iust not withstanding that it
”’t.s”””‘t”””Tgbd”‘\$X
tf,”
‘rr.,-
J*L”..r, ‘ï,,-. ,’th*
Plaintif f of being in a visible, cognizabÏe*7-;-,’*eriitTcag”=ând
crucial conf ]ict of interest in the matter.
*-.t..1ô&.,”.
.rii..r1
T.!r ;.
\,.
1′
“
ORDER:
FEDEHAL COUHT OF CANADA
çOUH rÉNËNALE DU CANADA P
FR
1
‘*’
–
tç’ b
t
”t,,
Dtc’J2 lgfl$
fl
DI
Mrct{Ët_ l” cinTf E r
REGISTRY OFFICEI{ FOt'{C-rlONt\iAlRE f)U GIIEFFE
TCRCNTO, ONT.
É
l-
…R
rrt
reLYtlit Ir\\ Êâm
sa_ la\t l -rËJ
^
.w
E|..L
-æ–*
ffi
t’1
a( Qrr
lln @be freùernl
ENTERED
ENTRE
t aurt of @snsùs
TRTAL
WôInd [s @sur fréùérsle ùu @snnùs
nibrdion
ABSTRACT OF HEARING
RESUME DE L’AUDITION
/
Page 1 SL
MINUTES OF HEARING
PROCÈS _
VERBAUX PFIOCES _
VEFIE
DArE )alPlW
vol …ù2S
oNTARro,
Lfiaoo4/r-,
. TORONTO,.
. PRESENT:.
. COURT .NO,. :.
.B.E.T.W.E E
.4*
-,/â*-o
y: ,s,
/
,/t
./:
.{.
I
é/r-.”- ,.n—&-*) /)
/
{trn
T-202A-BB
N:
/9,t,/
DANIEL J. LAVTGNE
Plaintiff
and -rIER MAdESTY’ TrrE’QUEEN
‘
.Def endant
COUNSEL:.
r)
rr/’/ ‘/ “7
/
–
‘/
‘ ‘ ‘CôuRr’RÉGïSrRAR:’
y””h’u,
7{t”{ ‘
n'{qt’%;f
,/
‘ ‘
^^–_-
t
__:–
t_ r
‘/
t t
‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘
‘ ‘ ‘ ‘
.f or the Def endanL
/’,,
lt
//
{*
côu*r
‘RÉGï’rRAR:’ ‘/’n”h’u’ {
â*-{ /’
‘
COURT USHER: / .,
/tftr/
DURATION:
/e
tY
-r.–#
/û;d
BEFORE THE COURT
1. .Motion on .behalf .of Plainti.ff. for.an order. for.
j udgment.
2. Defendant’s motion under RuIe 419(1) (a).
FC-3ri (3/77)
@ .LÀ
lr.#l IFI trflil
tY4!’L
^t!’t
E!i6
rdd1/d’il[t\;7ilcr
&Wr’Woùi
rffiffiffif
W
${‘eler&l
(tuurt
d ffxnu}x
Wriul pttrtsiun
TORONTO, ONTARTO, II{ONDAY, THE l-2th DAY
Court No. T-2A20-BB
OF DECEIT{BER, 19 B B .
BEFORE: PBTER A. K.
ASSOC IATE
BETWEEI’T z
HSQUÏRE
PROTHONOTARY.
G TLES ,
SENIOR
DANTEL J. LAVIGNE,
Pla.int if f ,
and -HER TIIAJESTY THE QUEET,I .
De fendant
Upon Motion dated the Ist day of Deeember, 1988 ot”I
behalf of the Plaintiff, for such Judgment as the Court may
think just not withstanding that it. is accused by the
Ptaintiff, of being in a visible, cognizable, critical and
crucial conffict of interest in the rnatter.
ORDER:
Motion dismissed.
I HËfqf;BY CËRïÏrY that tho âboo, clocument is a
tn:o Cofll/ ti’I tho original filed oT recorcl ln the Fiegistry
of thê Fjr.:cl*ini
,$nult of Cansrja tflt,-…,1*?-lf1çL,-.– day
l\
nr
\}kc.,,
Çrrn S
V I
t-.æHùt$d-t +rafuæe,À!.t( 9**
-‘.1
i
Dtltnd thls4i”!j,r-f rjay of
“Peter A.K. Gilestt
A. S. P.
C;iiircr
1s3[
Ë dtu TFooltl CoilFÊefùrr*r/a N
IT’T THE F:IID]TRAL COURT CF CAT,{ADA
Inthe matter of the ïncome Tax Act and in the matter of a notice of appeal
dateo. and filed the zOth day of October, noïu identifi3d Uy the Federal Court of
Canada Trial.Divisj-on as #2O2O-BB1 and in the matter of that appeal from the
decision of the Tax Court Of Canada dated June Bth, 19881 and in the matter of
the severe confllcts of interests attached to al-L parties thereto including the
defenclant, the defendantrs various Ministers.: including the Mlnisters of Defence,
Flnance, Justlce and Revenue among others and including the defendantts leEal
establlshment includinE its courts and judAes.
BTTT\,’,IIIE]iT :
DAITTEL J. LAVrGltE, Pl,ArNTrFr
AI’TD
:
IIER MAJIISTY THlt Q.UElrtV, DEF’EI’IDANT
NOTÏCB OF T4OTION
Talce notice that an application will- be made on behalf of the plaintiff
T re the presidlne
judse
at the Federal Court Of Canada, 33O University Avenue
RJ-rr f’lnnn
^h
Monday, the 12th day of December, 19BB at 1O:OO ocloclç in the vvrt arvvt
t
vrf
forenoon or so soon thereafter as may be heard for such.iudgement as the court
may think
.just
not withstandinE that it is accused by the plaintiff of beinE in
a visible, coÊnizable, critica1 and crucial conflict of interest’i-n the matter.
And further talçe noti-ce that in support of such application will be read
the affidavit of the plaintiff and other material- as the plaintiff may choosé
and this honourable court permi-t.
:’
And further take notice that the grounds for the application are
!h”
endantrs fail-ure to file a reply as required within the time alloted by the
Rul-es Of The Court and the defendantrs friehtful determlnatlon to use its courts
judges
and laws in a manner not in keeping with the principles of fundamental
justice
to enforce its
j-ncessant
and lmperative demand, that all humans resident
withj-n its clairned Jand.s pay taxes towards or otherwise support, that society
which it claims unto itself even though that society publicly acknowl-edges its
determination to continue its participatj-on in.those plans and preparations that
willfulty risk the murd.er of hundreds of mil-lions of defenceless human beings
and quite possibly and most probably risk the very extinction of all life on the
nlane t .
.L
Toronto this I st day of Decernber 1 9BB.
DAIVIEL J. LAVIG}TE. FIATNTIFF’
BOX 21 5g ,
IvtrSS ISSAUGA . OhtTAR IO
s ouAT?E ot\tE POST cFF r cE
,
L5B 1C7
Date d at
TO: T}IE F]IDERAL COURT Otr CAIVADA
AIID TO: TI{E D}IPUTY ATTORI’.IBY GENIIIRAL OF CAI’IADA
fËpfiRA,t
Ëguaï Ë[ .ç{ItÂanl
Ëf
i:’:-ri
i
fff
DErïrr irl*”
lg
COTJR FEDËRAIE
,DU
CANADô
:{
TtrftONr0,
ozuiaruu
BIITIiUII ltltr :
;
Ï}I TTTE FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
,i.
DAIIITIL J. IAVTGIIE,
PIA I}TT IF’F
-AI{DHER MAJ]ISTY THE QUEBN, .i
DEFE}IDANT
AFFÏDAVTT
r, DAIIIEL J. LAVrGltB,
o f l4e tropolitan Toronto ,
make oath and
1 / I am the plaintiff
knorrfledge of the matters herein.
of the City of
say as f oll-ovrrs:
of the matter herein and. as such have
,’
aa
llownsvi-ew in the rûunicipalit
”
‘?r’:
‘r
‘
Z/ T drafted thgnotice of motlon
pertai-ning to the matters therein mentloned..
3/ T have re fuse d to
since 1 9BO and have since continuously
ïuith will f ull evasion of taxe s or such
o f the matter be f ore a iudge and jury.
dated December 1st, 19BB
f ile tax re turïls or willingly pay taxe s
challenged the de f endant to charge me
charge that r,vi]l facilitate the delivery
t+/
T fear that the defendant, in continuins to rely on ils
courts and.judges to resolve the matterrrtln favour of 1ts
fTRJGHTil
to taxes or
other support of its involvement 1nHârms race that has accelerated the madness
of greed
and the accompanylng d.ecay of what, lj-ttle moral fibre remains, DESECRATI
the sanctity of the courts on whlch we must all rely as the fj-nal- arbiter of
what is .’iust and proper.
A DUTY

In the aftermath of tr{lorld ll/ar Three, there shall be two classes of survlvors. The first in the bunkers that v,ril-l- shelter the worl-drs political, military
and industrial- leaders. The second formed of vrounded and despairing souls who may
lvell then wonder why they ever alfowed their taxes, efforts and children to be so
misused. In the fol-]ov,rlng days what tortures will- the second group wish to exact
ullon the first? Even now the flrst
group prepares for that eventuâli-ty.
The I.ll,F. Treaty, the
ttHallmark
Of Defence Agreements”, has fail-ed; with
Nato and the $/arsaw Pact uslng the monies saved from the discontinuance
of that
missil-e group to further otherrtFirst Strike/Counter Strike” preparations. Both
acknowledge their development of new weapons and delivery systems; both reaffirm
their policy of
rtlmmediate
and Devastating Retallatory Responserr.
All
trPeace
Talksrr have failed and will continue to dail as the worldr s arm€
merchants deftly seek and use public monles to curtall meaningful negoti-ations,
assuring thereby the contlnuance of their prolific profits.
The peace movement has faj-led. Its newest and most vocal- adherents enjoyinp
the social camaradie yet fearing and failing to participate in a confrontation
designed to deny the nucl-ear powers the funds with vrhich they fueL the arms race.
V,Ihy? Do they have other agendaÉ? That type of involvement, that lack of resolve,
identifies and is similar to the abject apathy that abandons humanity to those who
most risk its exi-stence. True activists, comnltted activistsn shoul-d forget empty
hope and consider actions best equated with determination; and work thereby to
force the issue. Tirere is no other way. Parades, protests and parrotting are futil
, Societal indifference, humanity’s pathetic and stumbling stance, has
al-l-owed the vil-e and vi-o1ent to risk the destruction of civilization. Their dark
.and nnina”l c
urlu yr!’,q+ .;avageness, the spreading rnadness of greed and the accelerating decay ol
vrhat little moral fibre remains will cause the total- use of all- nuclLear and other
v’reapons of nrass murder. Their massive proliferation assures that usel-ess event.
” Such a negatj-ve, self-imposed, end to human endeavour must be averted. Itlo
force of v’riIlr ho demand of conscience, even at risk of anarchy, can be considered
b.-“rnd the limits of clvil disobedience or dissent when the result souEht, that
r,
..
–
be attained, is no l-ess than societyts salvatlon. That result, without questjcr
.’iustifies the use of the ineans herein described.
‘ The first: Refusing to support the insanity is of utmost importance. The
?’.\F2’l nanrrirsslsllf,
of a shared exlstence demands such actlon. l.To socj-ety particlpating ln preparations to vrage all-out nuclear war deserves nor shoul-d it receive
taxes or support of any kind from those recognizine their hurnanity.
The second: A compromise wherein those recoenizing the necessi-ty of the
first wish to avold the risk of anarchy and firmly withhofd only the military
‘rrn.i-i nn nr
their taxes. This acti-on of lers Areat possibltities of raisinE
-LJvr
wlvrr vr L
humanityrs consciousness and conscience Leading to the severe rebuke of all who
counsel and profit from vrarlike and murderous preparatlons.
o
The third: The developrrent of new technoloey allowing the most average of
adul-ts to bul1d a weapon the use of which will murder hund.réds of thousands could
IVE]I bE USEd TO FORCE THE TOTAL USE OF OR DISYIANTLING OF ALL OTHER IIIEAPOJ{S. ThE
attentlve and ideofoeical- response of some to Dylan ThomasrsrrDo not go meekly..tl
and their personal sense of worth and human val-ue will l-ead them to access that
+. ‘hnn’lncrr n”nç|
so utilize it by threatening the worldwide publication of the rrrv+vh./
l. .
r;re and construction of that weapon. Insanity? Perhaps. But also a possible,
holever paradoxlcal, scource of human salvation employlng the sane greed and
cowardice that curses our exi-stence.
The scenario of the third optiop ls one for fool-s, for all to think of; but
i.s it not only fools that have al]owed the accelerating development of ever more
nurnerous and deadly rveapons of mass murder and the public wJ-ll to use them?
iirle have littl-e time or choice left. Cur salvatlon, the continued existence
of humanity, may well require that we rj-sk forcing the total use of all nuclearand
other weapons of mass murder. Many have so decided and are now participatins in the
first option described reallzlne that the end result is the sane as option three
v”‘ithout the added risk of perÊonally contributing to the proliferation of another
class of weapons.
A pending action in the Federal Court Of Canada –
Trial Division /{2O2O-BB,
places a duty on governnents and their courts and’judges to review and redress
their culpable invol-vement in the prosecution of wars and the present arms râcêr
All- governments, most of the worl-drs larger neïyspapers and alL menbers of
Parl-iament plus differinA peace groups have received a copy of this statement. Ask
hard questions, vrait for constructive answers.
The matter is one of courage and morality, the question;
ItDoes
my birth as a
human being truly condemn me to paying taxes to and otherwise supporting a society
participating in:.plans and prepaiations to wage nuclear war and risk thereby the
murder of hundreds of mj-llions of defenceless fellow human beings?’t and the answer
to it defines the problem.
Seri-ous reaâers may wish to review

fs pleased to announce that the Federal Court of Canada
Trial Divlsion in action #2020-BB
(A
I’tew Vision Of Duty)
(- Danlel J. Lavigne vs. Her }tajesty The
Queen -)
due to its beinE unabl-e or unrvillinE. to deal l,’rith thesevere conf licts of
j-nterest
it faced in tha-t action,
accepted as fact, in stri-king out his statenent of claliii,
that parasraph 6 and al-l- other all-egations of fact including those barinE the courtrs confl-icts of interests,
would be conclusively established at trial. Surmountine
thereby those conflicts of interests posed all courts
i-n this matter bv pushinE it into the public arella. .Paragraph 6 staied:
I’The
plaintj-ff
rs
refusal- to support
the defendant or any ot,her who like the defendant is
involvecl in an aEreement viith other nations thdt invol–ves the will- and the capacity of the defendant and his
kind to murder hundreds.of millions of defenceless
human beinEs is not onl-y supportable at larv, it is
central to all l-avrs and it is of the’utmost necessity
for humanityts continued. survival- that all other hun,rn
beings similarly refuse to support the defendant or his
kind.
rr
The legal path is now clear for others who, due to their
consciences and perspectives of human exi-stence can no
loneer pay taxes to. or otherwise
‘support
a society par.-ticipatinn in preparations the use of vrhj-ch is predicated on an inhuman capacity to murder m1llions vlhil-e
.
:
aclcnowledsine that such action may also well rlsk the
very extinction of humanity.
Inquiries resardinE individual participation in this
legal and grovring tax refusal should be directed to:
I}TTBRNATIO}ïAL T{U},IAiVITY HOUSE
BCX 21 59, S-QUARB CT\TE P.O.,
MTSS TSSA UGA, CNTAI? I O
CAT’IADA t’B 3C?
[}A'[ [;r
: w
ilË
^Ëffi;*
Gouvernement
du Canada MEMORANDUM NOTE DE SERVICE

TORONTO,
ONTARTO, TUESDAY, THE
gth
DAy OF AUGUST, tggg.
BEFORE: TI{E ASSOCIATE CHIEF JUSTICE.
IN RE THE ÏNCOII{E TAX ACT
BETWEEN:
DANÏEL J. LAVIGNE,
Plaintiff,
– and
HER IT’IAJESTY THE QUEEN.
De fendant .
Upon Motion dated the 3rd day of August, 1989 on
behalf of the Plaintiff, for an ex parte injunction granting
rel-ief from the decision of the Defendant to construe or
otherwise J-nterpret the decisj”on of the Federal Court irr Court
Action Number T-2020-88 in a manner granting itself the right
to use the force of its laws to secure funds from the
Plaintif f
,
‘
which Plaintif f most solemnJ.y believes he lvas
granted the right by the considered decision of the Court to
vùithold f rom the Def enclanc:
.. o ../2
ALTERNAT TVELY
‘t
-2
‘
The Praint-iff
seeks
an order
Plaintiff
and the Defendant
time sufficient
I{onourable
court to seek elarification
of
Federal-
court – Trial Division
court Number
granting
both the
as al lowed by this
the rul ing of the
T- 2020-BB.*_
ALTERNAT
T VELY
The plaintiff
seeks
an
Pl-aintiff
‘s time Lo appear
the ruling
Trial Division,
Court Number T*2020_BB
ORDBR:
Orcler extending
the
of the trecleral
Court _
Ilor
appl icat.ion
is
re ason s g iven ora I
dismisse,C.
No order
ly from the
as to costs.
Bench
, thi s
“J. Jeromet,
A.C. J.
\
-t
Court No. T-2020-BB
Jllnhsrfrf
ffuurt ûf ffi.anslTs
Wrtal Æitrixîsn
ToRoNTo, oNTARro, TUESDAv, rnln atn DAy oF AUGUsr, 1989.
BEFORE: THE ASSOCIATE CFITBF JUSTICE.
TN RE THE INCOME TAX ACT
BETWEEN:
DANIEL J. LAVTGNE,
Plaint iff ,
– and
HER }IAJESTY THE QUEEN.
De fen dant .
Upon Motion dated the 3rd day of August, 1989 on
behalf of the Plaintiff, for an ex parte injunction granting
rel-ief from the decision of’ the Defendant to construe or
otherwise interpret the decision of the Federal Court in Court
Action Number T-2020-BB in a manner granting itself the right
to use the force of its laws to secure funds from the
Pl-aintif f , which Plaintif f most solemnly believes he \^ras
granted the right by the considered decision of the Court to
wi’Lho I d f .rom the De f endant :
trilrffi
ssïrsfô,&
jHui^{f,
ALTERNAT IVELY
.
/2
2
The . Plaintiff seeks an Order granting both the
Plaintiff and the Defendant time sufficient as allowed by this
Honourable Court to seek clarification of the ruling of the
Federal- Court – Trial Division Court Number T-2020-88
ALTERNATIVELY
The Plaintiff seeks an Order extending the
Plaintiff’s time to appeal the ruling of the Federal Court
TriaI Division, Court Number T-2020-BB.
/ /-{/A,bt
{
t/’-‘
ENTERED
ENTRE
g{‘PùÊrrl 6.sur! uf 6,anuùs
6.sur fêùôrult ùu 6.anuùu
TRTAL
IBibidion
AtsSTRACT OF HEARING
RÉSUMÊ DE L’AUDITIoN
LANGUAGE OF HEARIN G/ LANG UE DE L’AUDITION:
Page 1 :L &
MINUTES OF HEARIN
PRocÈS – VERBAUX
DA’E
4{rÇ7
TORONTO
L ONTARTO
PR ES ENT:
EN PRESENCE DE:
iee
Monsieur le juge
The Honourabfe Mr. Justice
Monsieur le ,juge
The Honourable Mr. Justice
Monsieur le
iuge
. , T-.20.2Q-gB. COURT NUMBER:
,NO, DE LA COUR:
BETWEEN:
ENTRE:
COUNSEL:
PROCUREURS,.
-AND.
ET
TELEPHON E NUMBERS:
NUMEROS DE TELEPHONE:
COURTROOM:
SAL LE D’AUDIENCE;
COURT REGISTRAR:
GREFFIER DE LA COUR:
R EPORTER:
STENOG RAPHE:
FCT-37 (11/87′,)
DAN.TEL . J, I,AyIGNE .
attaaaaaa.aa
– and-,.: ,et
HER. r\,lAdE$Ty
THE .QUBEN.
P”.f
endant
l’
h*.Itan-g,e-.-+)
8″t8 –
o;1
36 3
ta
n^..-0-u,ny\-W
f”f lh” .n1.1,rti.ff0
ryv\4.
(.tru)
f] ,. m cLX ef r .*.-rr)
la
,;3i#Xi’Jff”*.
.1tî14*
C . t^s C-Lus
PRINCIPAL:
,y
ABSTRACT OF HEARING
RESUME DE L’AUDITION
\)
COURT NO:
NO DE LA COUR:
T-2020-BB
Page
à
o, J.-TIME AND DURATION:
TEMPS ET DI,]REE:
BEFORE THE COURT:
DEVANT LA COUR:
‘ ‘RuIe
469 ex
….I
aaaa
aT) :
t:zo
. PIAinti.ff.’s. mgtion foq
parte inj unction granting
a.n or.def puçsrla4t
relief .
to
mo
)-rl
A
O.*À.R.41n..-.-\1&1 ,
t\
1A–t
V.
a
FCT.36 (11/871
I I I
-)el
I J:Jt-lu\Jt.| l-l I l/l\tJ LOl |-AL F1i-K 4J CI L g>: 3L+
i
/
/(
,.—Decision fr202o4s1of The Federal Court of
Canada recognizeé, and The Judgement Of
Nuremberg demands that all ast oo, the
right end duty to refuse to support a society
participating in plans and preparations
that are based on a will and capacity to use
nuclear and other weapons of mass murder.
l*llNTERI{^TloNÂL HUMANIW HOUSE I’I
//{i8,,3$01 Don Mllls Road, Toronto, Canads MzH 2S7
t
/l
r
4/ /
‘
t
/-ctls
1>’>
‘
,âr.^ ta–
|
fnHrc /
( r
ltf
ReqistreËon
#
rzoioeS-18023 |
By
INTER
HU
Tho
SE
VVloka
grn
Pt
I uxes
?/7
t(ry
//lilD
fô(‘
Jur
lc -*
@rder Of
)_’
,e ô
f
(‘
/c
c ‘/’)
*,/
57âû-À7À/ ‘(77Q
57tb-J73/
ÊFR-25-2AAI 1L:15 9tz ? ,2!
*x)**x***x)k$Fxxx -Cof,lll. JOURNÊL- **x*{<x)t***x***’i(**** DFITE JFIN-218-2O41 *xxxx TIl”lE 15:46 xxx P.O1
NODE
=
NEir0RY TRÊN5|’11551DN STÊRT=JÊN-EB L5: 45
FiLE N0.= A2?
STN NO. COI4 ÊBBR NO. STÊT I ON NÊI’4E/TEL. NO. PÊGES DURÊT I ON
agL EK ô t3FJ6g?55413 AA3/AFJ3 AIl:AA’,AF,”
-TRIÊL DILIISION
>k{(>i(>t()t(>k*>k*>k>k)t(>t<)i(>+(l(>kf(>k*X>t()t(X>t(X{(>t(>k)t(>k>k>t({(l(X )t()i()t()t(>k
$ener*^t Ço*rf
ffil
Çoomùm
Ço*
fÉùÉmrle ùnr @**ùm
Facsimile Trausm ittal Form/Form u la ire d’achem in ement per rélteo pieu r
(lncluding this cover page/incluanr te présenr formutairc)
N.B.: If you do not receive all pages beins transmitred, please call us ar the above number
S’il manque des pages, piièie de comrnuniquer avèc expédi.teur au numelo susmentionné.
END=JÊN-AB 15:46
!
TO/A
N^^rNo^r_^
Z ,,
fu
LocationÆndroit: FacsinrilrYo-naé”opir”r,
Jô û ? ft–fo /s
T\aued\ om:
LocationÆndroit:
Facsimile No./Téléc o pieur:
‘.
Cou.aNo: -/-Jo2o -f
(
F’ROIVI/DE
Narne/f.{otn:
Marie Lalonde
Registry Officer
Trial Division
n
Telephooe
To.,
(6lr) ggz_423g
Téléphone:
Facsimile No./
Télécopieur; (613)
952-3653
lD”,r,
,
I
f /ot
TimefiIeure:
TOTAL IVT,?IBER OF PAGES/NoMBRE DE PAGES:
Co mmeuts/Co ru m entaires
3,Jn,o/ C” *,t,1 e”;o.Jo
e’oLt,
/alaro/n
J* eonolo
MEMORANDUM / I\TOTE DE SERVI CEJ
é
/
Céline Dupont (Ottawa Office)
Acting Senior Registry Officer
(W-+,effi
Daniel J. Lavigne v. The
Queen
Court File No.: T-2020-88
Comments / Remarques
DATE:
RE:
I hereby transmit the following ORIGINAL COURT FILE:
Main and Annex B
REASON(S) FOR REQUEST
Request made by Garnet Morgan for viewing.
Please acknowledge receipt of the material on the attached copy of this
memo and return the material as soon as possible.
Court File Reviewed by:
ful
Approved by:
terial is hereby acknowledged.
#t–/f,rt{
Date
fi..J’t
t’æ
-{,
tr, .t)
-t
.- f/
{t
/ I {t_.
v.
I
tf
Mànager
*ù 6@
!:
1
-,-
ttt
.7
|
tt 12
Jeaera,{ Cowrt
MEMORANDUM / NOTE DE SERVICE
Afra MacDougall (Toronto Local Office)
March 28, 2000
Daniel J. Lavigne v. The
Queen
Court File No.: T-2020-88
“/
eonoJo
e”no
fala,o/n
J* eonoJo
Comments / Remarques
-FROM: —
Céline Dupona(Otttùa OffiCé)-Acting Senior Registry Officer
TO:
DATE:
RE:
‘i.
l
t
I hereby transmit the following ORIGINAL COURT FILE:
Main and Annex B
REASON(S) FOR REOUEST
Request made by Garnet Morgan for viewing.
Please acknowledge receipt o{ the material on the attached copy of this
memo and return the material as soon as possible
Court File Reviewed by:
Approved by:
Manager
Rece
/i
,6f’tr
(ry/
ipt is hereby acknowledged.
i
Si[nature Date
‘:i:jj
ç;
#.r::.r-:t. .
i-i
ra
i\
.. T’;
,’ l
-JI
V’ \,r/.
. .T. .
,a
. .
;ld’.
Postal
Date
REGULAR MAIL N
REGISTERED ,W
DOUBLE REGISTERED N
BY HAND D
.\.

STYLE OF CAUSE
As indicated beldw, the
proceeding is forwarded
“-A-
Certified copy
n Certificate
tr Certified copy
tl Certificate
tr Reasons for judgment
relating to the above were not given by the Court:
t judgment of . . .
tr Reasons for
t] order ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . … . . . .,, . datgd
-û itr*r’.o^—L-*–attached material relating to
herewith:
T
u
I judgment
and copy of
Certified copy of
f, order reasons of
Returned herewith:
(1)
Status
l Ackno reen copy

Pursuant to section 5 of the Official Languages Act all final
decisions, orders and judgments, including any reasons
given therefor, issued by the Court are issued in both official
languages. fn the event that such documents are issued in
the first instance in only one of the official languages, a copy
of the version in the other official language will be forwarded
on reguest when it is available.
Conformément à l’article 5 de la Loi sur les langues of{icielles, les décisions, ordonnances et
jugements finals, avec
les motifs y afférents, sont émis dans les deux langues officielles. Au cas où ces documents ne seraient émis, en premier lieu, que dans l’une des deux langues officielles, une
copie de la version dans I’autre langue officielle sera transmise, sur demande, dès qu’elle sera disponible.
COURT FILE COPY c-76 (REV. 8t87’i

REGULAR MAIL I
REGISTERED I
DOUBLE REGISTERED X
BY HAND df-! \,. r1 ‘r i

As indicated below, the attached material relating to the above-mentioned
proceeding is forwarded herewith:
W Certified copy ) of the order of ,3–r'{}.*4}—$*.-r.- r*xt tuI Certificate
tr Certified copy ) of the judgment
of
. Certificate )
. . … . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! . . . dated
tr Reasons for judgment relating to the above were not given by the Court.
û judgment
of . . .
û Reasons for
T
x
I judgment
and copy of
Certified copy of
f order reasons of
dated
Returned herewith:
(1)
tr
Status of Procggdings .. ………r………. ..;.
Acknowledge receipt by sending back green copy
N.B
*
Pursuant to section 5 of the Official Languages Act all final
decisions, orders and judgments, including any reasons
given therefor, issued by the Court are issued in both official
languages. ln the event that such documents are issued in
the first instance in only one of the official languages, a copy
of the version in the other official language will be forwarded
on request when it is available.

*
Conformément à l’article 5 de la Loi sur les langues officielles, les décisions, ordonnances et jugements finals, avec
les motifs y afférents, sont émis dans les deux langues officielles. Au cas où ces documents ne seraient émis, en premier lieu, que dans l’une des deux langues officielles, une
copie de la version dans I’autre langue officielle sera transrnise, sur demande, dès qu’elle sera disponible.
FC-76 (REV. 8/87) COURT FILE COPY

PDF – T2020-88 – Daniel J Lavigne vs Minister of National Revenue (International Humanity House)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Les conséquences à long terme de l’abus à l’enfance

Fraudulent news sites that are not news sites


	Diffusion email du BotCast:
	Archives Email